Patriotic History in Postcolonial Germany, Thirty Years After “Reunification”

IF 2.6 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Genocide Research Pub Date : 2021-09-03 DOI:10.1080/14623528.2021.1968151
Sabine Volk
{"title":"Patriotic History in Postcolonial Germany, Thirty Years After “Reunification”","authors":"Sabine Volk","doi":"10.1080/14623528.2021.1968151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Germany has long been championed for its exemplary Vergangenheitsaufarbeitung: its selfcritical “working through the past.” Centred around the commemoration of the Holocaust as a “breach of civilization” (Zivilisationsbruch), the emphatic rejection of antisemitism, and loyalty to the state of Israel, the country’s official politics of memory and public culture of remembrance allegedly renounce nationalistic interpretations of the past. So intense is the imperative to avoid apologetic gestures and implications of German self-pity that the documentation centre “Flight, Expulsion, Reconciliation,” which opened in June 2021 in Berlin, commemorates the experiences of the millions of Germans expelled from East Central Europe after the Second World War by relating them closely to Nazi terror. Even “happy” memories of recent episodes, notably the so-called reunification of former East and West Germany in 1990, tend to be superseded by the commemoration of the Shoah. At the same time, however, uncritical “patriotic history” is gaining ground. For many observers, patriotic history is mainly associated with the rise of the far right, notably the party Alternative for Germany (AfD), the social movement organization “Patriotic Europeans against the Islamization of the Occident” (PEGIDA), and the anti-lockdown mobilization of the so-called lateral thinkers (Querdenker) in the course of the Covid-19 pandemic. Propagating nationalist and revisionist readings of the past, such","PeriodicalId":46849,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genocide Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"276 - 287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genocide Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2021.1968151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Germany has long been championed for its exemplary Vergangenheitsaufarbeitung: its selfcritical “working through the past.” Centred around the commemoration of the Holocaust as a “breach of civilization” (Zivilisationsbruch), the emphatic rejection of antisemitism, and loyalty to the state of Israel, the country’s official politics of memory and public culture of remembrance allegedly renounce nationalistic interpretations of the past. So intense is the imperative to avoid apologetic gestures and implications of German self-pity that the documentation centre “Flight, Expulsion, Reconciliation,” which opened in June 2021 in Berlin, commemorates the experiences of the millions of Germans expelled from East Central Europe after the Second World War by relating them closely to Nazi terror. Even “happy” memories of recent episodes, notably the so-called reunification of former East and West Germany in 1990, tend to be superseded by the commemoration of the Shoah. At the same time, however, uncritical “patriotic history” is gaining ground. For many observers, patriotic history is mainly associated with the rise of the far right, notably the party Alternative for Germany (AfD), the social movement organization “Patriotic Europeans against the Islamization of the Occident” (PEGIDA), and the anti-lockdown mobilization of the so-called lateral thinkers (Querdenker) in the course of the Covid-19 pandemic. Propagating nationalist and revisionist readings of the past, such
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“统一”三十年后的后殖民德国爱国史
长期以来,德国一直以其典型的Vergangenheitsaufarbeitung而受到推崇:它的自我批评“跨越过去”。以纪念大屠杀为“破坏文明”(zcivilisationsbruch)、坚决反对反犹太主义和忠于以色列国为中心,该国的官方记忆政治和公共纪念文化据称放弃了对过去的民族主义解释。避免道歉的姿态和德国自怜的含义是如此迫切,以至于于2021年6月在柏林开放的“逃亡、驱逐、和解”文献中心,通过将二战后被驱逐出东欧的数百万德国人与纳粹的恐怖联系起来,纪念他们的经历。即使是对近期事件的“愉快”回忆,尤其是1990年所谓的前东德和西德统一,也往往被对大屠杀的纪念所取代。然而,与此同时,不加批判的“爱国史”正在流行起来。在许多观察人士看来,爱国主义的历史主要与极右翼的崛起有关,尤其是德国新选择党(AfD)、社会运动组织“反对西方伊斯兰化的爱国欧洲人”(PEGIDA),以及在新冠疫情期间所谓的横向思想家(Querdenker)的反封锁动员。宣扬民族主义和修正主义对过去的解读,比如
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Genocide Research
Journal of Genocide Research POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
“An Asiatic Deed”: The Cambodian Genocide and the West German Right, Or a Study of an Illiberal Variant of Multidirectional Memory Inescapably Genocidal The International Administration of Territory as an Interim Peace Introduction: The Russian Invasion of Ukraine When the Head of State Makes Rape Jokes, His Troops Rape on the Ground: Conflict-Related Sexual Violence in Russia’s Aggression against Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1