Expert-Informed Topic Models for Document Set Discovery

IF 6.3 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Communication Methods and Measures Pub Date : 2021-06-30 DOI:10.1080/19312458.2021.1920008
E. M. Rinke, Timo Dobbrick, Charlotte Löb, Cäcilia Zirn, Hartmut Wessler
{"title":"Expert-Informed Topic Models for Document Set Discovery","authors":"E. M. Rinke, Timo Dobbrick, Charlotte Löb, Cäcilia Zirn, Hartmut Wessler","doi":"10.1080/19312458.2021.1920008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The first step in many text-as-data studies is to find documents that address a specific topic within a larger document set. Researchers often rely on simple keyword searches to do this, even though this may introduce considerable selection bias. Such bias may be even greater when researchers lack the domain knowledge required to make informed search decisions, for example, in cross-national research or research on unfamiliar social contexts. We propose expert-informed topic modeling (EITM) as a hybrid approach to tackle this problem. EITM combines the validity of external domain knowledge captured through expert surveys with probabilistic topic models to help researchers identify subsets of documents that cover initially unknown domain-specific topics, such as specific events and debates, that belong to a researcher-defined master topic. EITM is a flexible and efficient approach to the thematic selection of documents from large text corpora for further study. We benchmark and validate the method by discovering blog posts that address the public role of religion within large corpora of Australian, Swiss, and Turkish blog posts and provide researchers with a complete workflow to guide the application of EITM in their own work.","PeriodicalId":47552,"journal":{"name":"Communication Methods and Measures","volume":"16 1","pages":"39 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19312458.2021.1920008","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Methods and Measures","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2021.1920008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

ABSTRACT The first step in many text-as-data studies is to find documents that address a specific topic within a larger document set. Researchers often rely on simple keyword searches to do this, even though this may introduce considerable selection bias. Such bias may be even greater when researchers lack the domain knowledge required to make informed search decisions, for example, in cross-national research or research on unfamiliar social contexts. We propose expert-informed topic modeling (EITM) as a hybrid approach to tackle this problem. EITM combines the validity of external domain knowledge captured through expert surveys with probabilistic topic models to help researchers identify subsets of documents that cover initially unknown domain-specific topics, such as specific events and debates, that belong to a researcher-defined master topic. EITM is a flexible and efficient approach to the thematic selection of documents from large text corpora for further study. We benchmark and validate the method by discovering blog posts that address the public role of religion within large corpora of Australian, Swiss, and Turkish blog posts and provide researchers with a complete workflow to guide the application of EITM in their own work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于文档集发现的专家知情主题模型
摘要许多文本即数据研究的第一步是在更大的文档集中找到涉及特定主题的文档。研究人员通常依靠简单的关键词搜索来做到这一点,尽管这可能会带来相当大的选择偏差。当研究人员缺乏做出知情搜索决策所需的领域知识时,这种偏见可能会更大,例如,在跨国研究或对陌生社会背景的研究中。我们提出了专家知情主题建模(EITM)作为一种混合方法来解决这个问题。EITM将通过专家调查获得的外部领域知识的有效性与概率主题模型相结合,以帮助研究人员识别涵盖最初未知领域特定主题的文档子集,如属于研究人员定义的主主题的特定事件和辩论。EITM是一种灵活有效的方法,可以从大型文本语料库中选择文档进行进一步研究。我们通过在澳大利亚、瑞士和土耳其的大型博客文章语料库中发现涉及宗教公共角色的博客文章,对该方法进行了基准测试和验证,并为研究人员提供了一个完整的工作流程,以指导EITM在他们自己的工作中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.10
自引率
1.80%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Communication Methods and Measures aims to achieve several goals in the field of communication research. Firstly, it aims to bring attention to and showcase developments in both qualitative and quantitative research methodologies to communication scholars. This journal serves as a platform for researchers across the field to discuss and disseminate methodological tools and approaches. Additionally, Communication Methods and Measures seeks to improve research design and analysis practices by offering suggestions for improvement. It aims to introduce new methods of measurement that are valuable to communication scientists or enhance existing methods. The journal encourages submissions that focus on methods for enhancing research design and theory testing, employing both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Furthermore, the journal is open to articles devoted to exploring the epistemological aspects relevant to communication research methodologies. It welcomes well-written manuscripts that demonstrate the use of methods and articles that highlight the advantages of lesser-known or newer methods over those traditionally used in communication. In summary, Communication Methods and Measures strives to advance the field of communication research by showcasing and discussing innovative methodologies, improving research practices, and introducing new measurement methods.
期刊最新文献
JST and rJST: joint estimation of sentiment and topics in textual data using a semi-supervised approach Using State Space Grids to Quantify and Examine Dynamics of Dyadic Conversation Bootstrapping public entities. Domain-specific NER for public speakers On Measurement Validity and Language Models: Increasing Validity and Decreasing Bias with Instructions Googling Politics? Comparing Five Computational Methods to Identify Political and News-related Searches from Web Browser Histories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1