Governing Parental Drug Use in the UK: What’s Hidden in “Hidden Harm?”

IF 2.3 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Contemporary Drug Problems Pub Date : 2020-07-13 DOI:10.1177/0091450920941267
A. Whittaker, F. Martin, Anna Olsen, E. Wincup
{"title":"Governing Parental Drug Use in the UK: What’s Hidden in “Hidden Harm?”","authors":"A. Whittaker, F. Martin, Anna Olsen, E. Wincup","doi":"10.1177/0091450920941267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2003, the UK Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs published Hidden Harm, the product of an inquiry that exposed the “problems” of parental drug use and its neglect by professionals. It outlined an extensive program of reforms designed to protect children from harm. Despite its far-reaching influence, it has rarely been subject to scrutiny, with analyses focusing on its impact instead. Drawing on Bacchi’s post-structuralist “What’s the Problem Represented to be” approach, we examine problematizations within Hidden Harm and their implications for the governance of family life. We illustrate how Hidden Harm produced a simplified version of parenting and child welfare within the context of drug use by largely equating drug use with “bad” parenting and child maltreatment and by ignoring the social determinants of health and the wider social ecology of family life. Using a tried-and-tested driver of policy change, Hidden Harm created a “scandal” about the lack of intervention by professionals that was used to justify and legitimize increased state intervention into the lives of parents who use drugs. Hidden Harm proposed simplistic “solutions” that centered on drug treatment, child protection and the responsibilization of professionals to govern “risky” parents. We argue these rationalities, subjectivities and strategies serve to marginalize and stigmatize families further and hide alternative approaches to understanding, representing and responding to the complex needs of children and families who are disproportionately affected by health and social inequalities. By uncovering what is hidden in Hidden Harm, we aim to stimulate further research and theoretically informed debate about policy and practice related to child welfare, parenting and family life within the context of drug use. We conclude with some ideas about how to reframe public discourse on parents who use drugs and their children, in tandem with collaborative responses to alleviate child poverty and inequalities.","PeriodicalId":35813,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Drug Problems","volume":"47 1","pages":"170 - 187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0091450920941267","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Drug Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0091450920941267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In 2003, the UK Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs published Hidden Harm, the product of an inquiry that exposed the “problems” of parental drug use and its neglect by professionals. It outlined an extensive program of reforms designed to protect children from harm. Despite its far-reaching influence, it has rarely been subject to scrutiny, with analyses focusing on its impact instead. Drawing on Bacchi’s post-structuralist “What’s the Problem Represented to be” approach, we examine problematizations within Hidden Harm and their implications for the governance of family life. We illustrate how Hidden Harm produced a simplified version of parenting and child welfare within the context of drug use by largely equating drug use with “bad” parenting and child maltreatment and by ignoring the social determinants of health and the wider social ecology of family life. Using a tried-and-tested driver of policy change, Hidden Harm created a “scandal” about the lack of intervention by professionals that was used to justify and legitimize increased state intervention into the lives of parents who use drugs. Hidden Harm proposed simplistic “solutions” that centered on drug treatment, child protection and the responsibilization of professionals to govern “risky” parents. We argue these rationalities, subjectivities and strategies serve to marginalize and stigmatize families further and hide alternative approaches to understanding, representing and responding to the complex needs of children and families who are disproportionately affected by health and social inequalities. By uncovering what is hidden in Hidden Harm, we aim to stimulate further research and theoretically informed debate about policy and practice related to child welfare, parenting and family life within the context of drug use. We conclude with some ideas about how to reframe public discourse on parents who use drugs and their children, in tandem with collaborative responses to alleviate child poverty and inequalities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国父母吸毒管理:“隐性危害”中隐藏着什么
2003年,英国滥用药物咨询委员会出版了《隐藏的危害》,这是一项调查的结果,该调查揭露了父母吸毒的“问题”及其被专业人士忽视的情况。它概述了一项旨在保护儿童免受伤害的广泛改革计划。尽管其影响深远,但它很少受到审查,而是将分析重点放在其影响上。借鉴巴奇的后结构主义“代表的问题是什么”方法,我们研究了“隐性伤害”中的问题化及其对家庭生活治理的影响。我们展示了“隐性伤害”是如何在吸毒的背景下产生简化版的育儿和儿童福利的,它在很大程度上将吸毒等同于“糟糕”的育儿和虐待儿童,并忽视了健康的社会决定因素和家庭生活的更广泛社会生态。Hidden Harm利用一个久经考验的政策变革驱动力,制造了一个关于专业人员缺乏干预的“丑闻”,该丑闻被用来证明国家对吸毒父母生活的更多干预是正当的和合法的。Hidden Harm提出了简单化的“解决方案”,重点是药物治疗、儿童保护和专业人员管理“危险”父母的责任。我们认为,这些理性、主观和策略有助于进一步边缘化和污名化家庭,并隐藏理解、代表和回应儿童和家庭复杂需求的替代方法,这些儿童和家庭受到健康和社会不平等的不成比例的影响。通过揭示隐藏在“隐性危害”中的内容,我们旨在激发对药物使用背景下与儿童福利、育儿和家庭生活相关的政策和实践的进一步研究和理论上的辩论。最后,我们提出了一些想法,即如何重新构建关于吸毒父母及其子女的公共话语,同时采取合作应对措施,缓解儿童贫困和不平等现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Drug Problems
Contemporary Drug Problems Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Contemporary Drug Problems is a scholarly journal that publishes peer-reviewed social science research on alcohol and other psychoactive drugs, licit and illicit. The journal’s orientation is multidisciplinary and international; it is open to any research paper that contributes to social, cultural, historical or epidemiological knowledge and theory concerning drug use and related problems. While Contemporary Drug Problems publishes all types of social science research on alcohol and other drugs, it recognizes that innovative or challenging research can sometimes struggle to find a suitable outlet. The journal therefore particularly welcomes original studies for which publication options are limited, including historical research, qualitative studies, and policy and legal analyses. In terms of readership, Contemporary Drug Problems serves a burgeoning constituency of social researchers as well as policy makers and practitioners working in health, welfare, social services, public policy, criminal justice and law enforcement.
期刊最新文献
Civil Society Organizations and Harm Reduction Policy: The Mexican Case A Scoping Review of Australian Literature on People Who Use MDMA and Their Harm Reduction Practices Workers with Lived and Living Experience: Characteristics and Wellbeing in the Australian AOD Sector Parental Substance Use as a Child Protection Problem: A Poststructural Interview Analysis The Twin Dangers of Order and Disorder: Rethinking the Relationship Between Movement and Change in Drug Treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1