Results after minimally invasive Toupet fundoplication technique: a narrative review

E. Ugliono, Elisabetta Seno, M. Allaix, F. Rebecchi, M. Morino
{"title":"Results after minimally invasive Toupet fundoplication technique: a narrative review","authors":"E. Ugliono, Elisabetta Seno, M. Allaix, F. Rebecchi, M. Morino","doi":"10.21037/LS-20-101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Posterior partial fundoplication (PPF) was developed as an alternative surgical strategy to Nissen fundoplication, in attempt to reduce the rate of side-effects, mainly dysphagia and gas bloat syndrome. Allowing patients to maintain belching ability, this operation could lead to minor gas-related symptoms than total fundoplication. The procedure was first described by Andrè Toupet in 1963 and consisted of a posterior 180° wrap of the gastric fundus through a midline incision. After the first report of anti-reflux surgery performed with the laparoscopic approach, several authors have translated PPF into a minimally invasive approach. A review of literature has been performed to evaluate the results of minimally invasive PPF, focusing on the rate of dysphagia and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) recurrence. The evidence suggests that laparoscopic PPF is a safe and feasible procedure, and provides similar reflux control compared to laparoscopic total fundoplication, with lower risk of postoperative dysphagia. However, the duration of laparoscopic PPF effect on reflux control over time is questioned, as data on long-term results after laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication are lacking. Further studies are needed to provide long-term functional and clinical results of laparoscopic PPF in order to draw definitive conclusions. Therefore, the controversy regarding the optimal surgical strategy for the management of gastroesophageal reflux continues.","PeriodicalId":92818,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laparoscopic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/LS-20-101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Posterior partial fundoplication (PPF) was developed as an alternative surgical strategy to Nissen fundoplication, in attempt to reduce the rate of side-effects, mainly dysphagia and gas bloat syndrome. Allowing patients to maintain belching ability, this operation could lead to minor gas-related symptoms than total fundoplication. The procedure was first described by Andrè Toupet in 1963 and consisted of a posterior 180° wrap of the gastric fundus through a midline incision. After the first report of anti-reflux surgery performed with the laparoscopic approach, several authors have translated PPF into a minimally invasive approach. A review of literature has been performed to evaluate the results of minimally invasive PPF, focusing on the rate of dysphagia and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) recurrence. The evidence suggests that laparoscopic PPF is a safe and feasible procedure, and provides similar reflux control compared to laparoscopic total fundoplication, with lower risk of postoperative dysphagia. However, the duration of laparoscopic PPF effect on reflux control over time is questioned, as data on long-term results after laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication are lacking. Further studies are needed to provide long-term functional and clinical results of laparoscopic PPF in order to draw definitive conclusions. Therefore, the controversy regarding the optimal surgical strategy for the management of gastroesophageal reflux continues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微创Toupet扩底术后的疗效回顾
后部分胃底折叠术(PPF)是Nissen胃底折叠的一种替代手术策略,旨在降低副作用的发生率,主要是吞咽困难和气胀综合征。与全胃底折叠术相比,这种手术可以使患者保持打嗝能力,从而导致轻微的气体相关症状。该手术由AndrèToupet于1963年首次描述,包括通过中线切口对胃底进行180°后包裹。在首次报道腹腔镜入路抗反流手术后,几位作者将PPF转化为微创入路。对文献进行了综述,以评估微创PPF的结果,重点是吞咽困难和胃食管反流病(GERD)复发率。有证据表明,腹腔镜PPF是一种安全可行的手术,与腹腔镜全胃底折叠术相比,它提供了类似的反流控制,术后吞咽困难的风险较低。然而,随着时间的推移,腹腔镜PPF对反流控制的作用持续时间受到质疑,因为缺乏腹腔镜Toupet胃底折叠术后长期结果的数据。需要进一步的研究来提供腹腔镜PPF的长期功能和临床结果,以便得出明确的结论。因此,关于胃食管反流最佳手术策略的争论仍在继续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Minimally-invasive multidisciplinary treatment of deep endometriosis: 103 cases Case report: neuroendocrine tumour causing torsion of the appendix in an adolescent—a rare and unexpected twist Is elective cholecystectomy effective in geriatric patients to prevent new biliopancreatic events following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for benign biliopancreatic pathology? Managing complex pancreatic anastomoses after minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy Laparoscopic management of giant adrenal cyst: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1