Participatory action research in the design, construction and evaluation of improved cook stoves in a rural Yucatec Maya community

IF 1.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Action Research Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1177/1476750317704047
Octavio López-Martínez, H. E. Cuanalo de la Cerda
{"title":"Participatory action research in the design, construction and evaluation of improved cook stoves in a rural Yucatec Maya community","authors":"Octavio López-Martínez, H. E. Cuanalo de la Cerda","doi":"10.1177/1476750317704047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different initiatives have promoted the use of improved cook stoves around the world. Their goal has been to eradicate cooking over open flame inside dwellings because it is associated with health problems, inefficient resource use and greenhouse gas emissions. Most of these improved cook stoves initiatives depend heavily on expert-generated solutions, treating users as mere recipients. However, they have had little success in terms of adoption rates. Their failures are due to myriad factors, highlighting the complexity of this problem. In the rural community of Yaxcabá, Mexico, most households use wood as a cooking fuel in small fire pits. As an alternative approach to this problem, we proposed a project to create an improved cook stoves based on dialogue with community members. We used a systems approach to analyze the large number of variables involved in the problem. Following participatory action research approach, we worked with 17 participants forming two groups in a process of self-diagnosis, design, construction and evaluation of two improved cook stoves models. The participants stated that the resulting improved cook stoves offered multiple advantages over previous devices, particularly in sociocultural, environmental and comfort aspects.","PeriodicalId":46969,"journal":{"name":"Action Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1476750317704047","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750317704047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Different initiatives have promoted the use of improved cook stoves around the world. Their goal has been to eradicate cooking over open flame inside dwellings because it is associated with health problems, inefficient resource use and greenhouse gas emissions. Most of these improved cook stoves initiatives depend heavily on expert-generated solutions, treating users as mere recipients. However, they have had little success in terms of adoption rates. Their failures are due to myriad factors, highlighting the complexity of this problem. In the rural community of Yaxcabá, Mexico, most households use wood as a cooking fuel in small fire pits. As an alternative approach to this problem, we proposed a project to create an improved cook stoves based on dialogue with community members. We used a systems approach to analyze the large number of variables involved in the problem. Following participatory action research approach, we worked with 17 participants forming two groups in a process of self-diagnosis, design, construction and evaluation of two improved cook stoves models. The participants stated that the resulting improved cook stoves offered multiple advantages over previous devices, particularly in sociocultural, environmental and comfort aspects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尤卡特玛雅农村社区改良炉灶设计、建造和评估的参与性行动研究
不同的倡议促进了世界各地对改良炉灶的使用。他们的目标是根除住宅内明火烹饪,因为这与健康问题、资源利用效率低下和温室气体排放有关。大多数这些改进炉灶的举措严重依赖于专家提出的解决方案,将用户仅仅视为接受者。然而,就采用率而言,他们几乎没有取得成功。他们的失败是由无数因素造成的,这凸显了这个问题的复杂性。在墨西哥雅克斯卡布的农村社区,大多数家庭在小火坑里用木头作为做饭的燃料。作为解决这个问题的另一种方法,我们提出了一个项目,在与社区成员对话的基础上创造一种改进的炉灶。我们用系统的方法来分析这个问题中涉及的大量变量。我们采用参与式行动研究方法,与17名参与者组成两个小组,对两种改进的炉灶模型进行自我诊断、设计、建造和评估。参与者表示,由此改进的炉灶比以前的设备具有多种优势,特别是在社会文化、环境和舒适方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Action Research
Action Research Multiple-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Action Research is a new international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal which is a forum for the development of the theory and practice of action research. Our purpose with this international, peer reviewed journal is to offer a forum for participative, action oriented inquiry into questions that matter--questions relevant to people in the conduct of their lives, that enable them to flourish in their organizations and communities, and that evince a deep concern for the wider ecology. The aim of the journal is to offer a viable alternative to dominant "disinterested" models of social science, one that is relevant to people in the conduct of their lives, their organizations and their communities.
期刊最新文献
How long-term emancipatory programming facilitates participatory evaluation: Building a methodology of participation through research with youth in Honduras. Photovoice for promoting empowerment with migrant and refugee communities: A scoping review Participatory action research: A tool to develop occupational health and safety education for new immigrant workers Benefits of reflection-based monitoring in action research projects Action research with sociodrama in a healthcare institution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1