Human Health Threat and Economic Vulnerability: A Case Study on the COVID-19 Pandemic

Mirah Satria Alamsyah, M. Alfian, Miftah Farid Darussalam
{"title":"Human Health Threat and Economic Vulnerability: A Case Study on the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Mirah Satria Alamsyah, M. Alfian, Miftah Farid Darussalam","doi":"10.7454/GLOBAL.V23I1.515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper frames the approach to determining policies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which either prioritise human health security protection or economic vulnerability. In this paper, the human security concept will be used to explain COVID-19 as a health security problem due to the existence of an existential threat. However, the same approach is not applicable in looking at COVID-19 as an economic security problem. Because the existential threat is less visible in human economic security aspects, it tends to be more appropriate to look at COVID-19 as the stressor that strengthens human vulnerabilities. This paper uses a qualitative descriptive approach by using the conceptual framework to analyse news, reports, books, and academic journals as the sources of data. The writers analyse and group the data by types of security, as well as based upon the root causes that contribute to human vulnerability, then compare both sectors. This paper argues that in the pandemic situation, human health is threatened, whereas the economy is at a vulnerable position due to COVID-19. This paper also argues that COVID-19 has not yet threatened human economic security in the early stage, but soon, it will. As a result, stakeholders need to prioritise policies based on the human health security approach.","PeriodicalId":32472,"journal":{"name":"Global Jurnal Politik Internasional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Jurnal Politik Internasional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7454/GLOBAL.V23I1.515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper frames the approach to determining policies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which either prioritise human health security protection or economic vulnerability. In this paper, the human security concept will be used to explain COVID-19 as a health security problem due to the existence of an existential threat. However, the same approach is not applicable in looking at COVID-19 as an economic security problem. Because the existential threat is less visible in human economic security aspects, it tends to be more appropriate to look at COVID-19 as the stressor that strengthens human vulnerabilities. This paper uses a qualitative descriptive approach by using the conceptual framework to analyse news, reports, books, and academic journals as the sources of data. The writers analyse and group the data by types of security, as well as based upon the root causes that contribute to human vulnerability, then compare both sectors. This paper argues that in the pandemic situation, human health is threatened, whereas the economy is at a vulnerable position due to COVID-19. This paper also argues that COVID-19 has not yet threatened human economic security in the early stage, but soon, it will. As a result, stakeholders need to prioritise policies based on the human health security approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类健康威胁与经济脆弱性——以新冠肺炎疫情为例
本文提出了确定应对COVID-19大流行政策的方法,这些政策要么优先考虑人类健康安全保护,要么优先考虑经济脆弱性。在本文中,将使用人类安全的概念来解释COVID-19作为一个健康安全问题,因为存在存在的威胁。然而,同样的方法不适用于将新冠肺炎视为经济安全问题。由于生存威胁在人类经济安全方面不太明显,因此将COVID-19视为加剧人类脆弱性的压力源往往更为合适。本文采用定性描述的方法,使用概念框架来分析新闻、报告、书籍和学术期刊作为数据来源。作者根据安全类型以及导致人类脆弱性的根本原因对数据进行分析和分组,然后比较这两个部门。本文认为,在大流行形势下,人类健康受到威胁,而经济因COVID-19而处于弱势地位。本文还认为,COVID-19在早期尚未威胁到人类的经济安全,但很快就会威胁到。因此,利益攸关方需要根据人类健康安全方针制定优先政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
TURNING UBUD INTO UNWTO'S PROTOTYPE FOR A WORLD GASTRONOMIC DESTINATION THROUGH GASTRODIPLOMACY ASEAN’S ROLE IN THE REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (RCEP) FORMATION TO ENHANCE REGIONAL ECONOMIC INTEGRATION A CONSTRUCTIVIST ANALYSIS OF CHINA’S GEOPOLITICAL ECONOMIC STRATEGY TOWARD AFRICA: A CASE OF SINO-TANZANIAN SOUTH-SOUTH COOPERATION MIDDLE POWER AND SYMBOLIC POWER IN CLIMATE CHANGE NEGOTIATIONS: THE CASE OF INDONESIA’S STRATEGY IN THE KATOWICE CLIMATE CHANGE CONFERENCE FROM RIVALS TO PARTNERS: THE EVOLUTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION AMONG CHINA, JAPAN, AND KOREA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1