Extreme-user conditions to enhance design creativity and empathy- application using visual impairment

IF 2.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation Pub Date : 2022-01-11 DOI:10.1080/21650349.2021.2024093
Sujithra Raviselvam, Dongwook Hwang, Bradley Camburn, K. Sng, Katja Hölttä-Otto, Kris Wood
{"title":"Extreme-user conditions to enhance design creativity and empathy- application using visual impairment","authors":"Sujithra Raviselvam, Dongwook Hwang, Bradley Camburn, K. Sng, Katja Hölttä-Otto, Kris Wood","doi":"10.1080/21650349.2021.2024093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Extreme-users who experience physical, sensory or cognitive challenges can help identify latent needs across a majority of the general population users. Identifying these latent needs may open doors to novel products, services, and systems. Empathic design techniques of simulation tools and scenarios allow designers to experience a range of extreme-user perspectives. However, research still lacks a thorough understanding of the potential impact of such techniques, especially their potential to uncover and address latent needs. This paper strengthens the understanding of simulation tools and scenarios by analyzing two user-centered workshops that applied simulated scenarios to empathize with users with visual impairments (VIs), and uses an empathic similarity metric to evaluate the empathic outcomes in conjunction with self-evaluated empathy. In addition to empathy, creativity is measured for the concepts shared by 36 (x2) workshop participants and 13 participants with VIs. Empirical analysis of the results, across two sequences of controlled studies, supports the potential of simulated scenarios in evoking participant creativity and empathy. KEY TERMINOLOGIES Empathy: Ability to understand and share feelings of others without judgment. Simulation: Imitation of a process, situation, or circumstance. Scenario: Context-specific (how, where, and who) circumstances experienced by users. Latent Needs: Needs that are important yet not obvious to the average user (Otto & Wood, 1998). Extreme-Users: Users who experience challenges with physical or cognitive abilities. General Population: The remainder of the population who do not qualify as extreme-users.","PeriodicalId":43485,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation","volume":"10 1","pages":"75 - 100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2021.2024093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT Extreme-users who experience physical, sensory or cognitive challenges can help identify latent needs across a majority of the general population users. Identifying these latent needs may open doors to novel products, services, and systems. Empathic design techniques of simulation tools and scenarios allow designers to experience a range of extreme-user perspectives. However, research still lacks a thorough understanding of the potential impact of such techniques, especially their potential to uncover and address latent needs. This paper strengthens the understanding of simulation tools and scenarios by analyzing two user-centered workshops that applied simulated scenarios to empathize with users with visual impairments (VIs), and uses an empathic similarity metric to evaluate the empathic outcomes in conjunction with self-evaluated empathy. In addition to empathy, creativity is measured for the concepts shared by 36 (x2) workshop participants and 13 participants with VIs. Empirical analysis of the results, across two sequences of controlled studies, supports the potential of simulated scenarios in evoking participant creativity and empathy. KEY TERMINOLOGIES Empathy: Ability to understand and share feelings of others without judgment. Simulation: Imitation of a process, situation, or circumstance. Scenario: Context-specific (how, where, and who) circumstances experienced by users. Latent Needs: Needs that are important yet not obvious to the average user (Otto & Wood, 1998). Extreme-Users: Users who experience challenges with physical or cognitive abilities. General Population: The remainder of the population who do not qualify as extreme-users.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
极端的用户条件,以提高设计的创造力和同理心-应用使用视觉障碍
摘要经历身体、感官或认知挑战的极端用户可以帮助识别大多数普通用户的潜在需求。识别这些潜在需求可能会为新产品、服务和系统打开大门。模拟工具和场景的移情设计技术使设计师能够体验到一系列极端的用户视角。然而,研究仍然缺乏对此类技术的潜在影响的彻底理解,尤其是它们揭示和解决潜在需求的潜力。本文通过分析两个以用户为中心的研讨会来加强对模拟工具和场景的理解,这两个研讨会应用模拟场景与视觉障碍用户进行移情,并使用移情相似性度量来评估移情结果和自我评估的移情。除了同理心之外,还对36名(x2)研讨会参与者和13名VI参与者共享的概念进行了创造力测量。对两组对照研究结果的实证分析支持了模拟场景在激发参与者创造力和同理心方面的潜力。同理心:能够不加评判地理解和分享他人的感受。模拟:对过程、情况或环境的模仿。场景:用户经历的特定于上下文的(如何、在哪里和谁)情况。潜在需求:对普通用户来说很重要但并不明显的需求(Otto&Wood,1998)。极限用户:体验身体或认知能力挑战的用户。普通人群:不符合极端使用者资格的剩余人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
27.80%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation is an international publication that provides a forum for discussing the nature and potential of creativity and innovation in design from both theoretical and practical perspectives. Design creativity and innovation is truly an interdisciplinary academic research field that will interest and stimulate researchers of engineering design, industrial design, architecture, art, and similar areas. The journal aims to not only promote existing research disciplines but also pioneer a new one that lies in the intermediate area between the domains of systems engineering, information technology, computer science, social science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, psychology, philosophy, linguistics, and related fields. The journal covers, but is not restricted to, the following topics: ·Theories on Design Creativity and Innovation ·Cognition of Design Creativity ·Innovative Process ·Inventive Process ·Analogical Reasoning for Design Creativity and Innovation ·Design Synthesis ·Method and Tools for Design Creativity and Innovation ·Representation of Design Creativity and Innovation ·Education for Design Creativity and Innovation ·Concept Generation and Inspiration.
期刊最新文献
Leading to overcome heterogeneous fixations: designing to limit the impact of the rejection of creative ideas From science to art forms: exploring design, creativity and innovation through chaos physicalization Appreciation to Reviewers Extracting design knowledge from online product reviews to support design creativity The dialect of user-centered care: creating an understanding of how current design methods are used within health through an allied-health lens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1