Islamophobia and Antisemitism are Different in Their Potential for Globalization

Q1 Arts and Humanities Journal of Religion and Violence Pub Date : 2021-04-26 DOI:10.5840/JRV202142689
T. Brekke
{"title":"Islamophobia and Antisemitism are Different in Their Potential for Globalization","authors":"T. Brekke","doi":"10.5840/JRV202142689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A widespread assumption in research on prejudice and hate crime is that Islamophobia and antisemitism are analogous phenomena: both travel easily across national and cultural boundaries and adapt to new contexts. This article argues that this assumption is incorrect. Islamophobia works well in very different cultural contexts and shows highly diverse localized expressions. Antisemitism is linked to Christian theology even when expressed in Muslim societies and is not global to nearly the same extent as Islamophobia. The key question is this: how can we understand the cultural conditions for the globalization of antisemitism and Islamophobia? To answer this the article looks briefly at Islamophobia and antisemitism in Chinese and Hindu civilizations and then moves on to introduce the theory of cultural models. Islamophobia is a family of more or less similar cultural models belonging to a range of different cultures across time and space. This is the general answer to the question of why Islamophobia is an intensely globalizing prejudice. Islamophobia should be conceptualized as a number of overlapping cultural models found in various societies. Today, local varieties of Islamophobia seem to come into closer contact, to converge and sometimes to exchange elements as a result of intensifying transnational and global communication.","PeriodicalId":36668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religion and Violence","volume":"9 1","pages":"80-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religion and Violence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/JRV202142689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A widespread assumption in research on prejudice and hate crime is that Islamophobia and antisemitism are analogous phenomena: both travel easily across national and cultural boundaries and adapt to new contexts. This article argues that this assumption is incorrect. Islamophobia works well in very different cultural contexts and shows highly diverse localized expressions. Antisemitism is linked to Christian theology even when expressed in Muslim societies and is not global to nearly the same extent as Islamophobia. The key question is this: how can we understand the cultural conditions for the globalization of antisemitism and Islamophobia? To answer this the article looks briefly at Islamophobia and antisemitism in Chinese and Hindu civilizations and then moves on to introduce the theory of cultural models. Islamophobia is a family of more or less similar cultural models belonging to a range of different cultures across time and space. This is the general answer to the question of why Islamophobia is an intensely globalizing prejudice. Islamophobia should be conceptualized as a number of overlapping cultural models found in various societies. Today, local varieties of Islamophobia seem to come into closer contact, to converge and sometimes to exchange elements as a result of intensifying transnational and global communication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊斯兰恐惧症和反犹太主义对全球化的影响不同
在关于偏见和仇恨犯罪的研究中,一个普遍的假设是,伊斯兰恐惧症和反犹太主义是类似的现象:两者都很容易跨越国家和文化界限,并适应新的环境。本文认为这种假设是不正确的。伊斯兰恐惧症在非常不同的文化背景下表现良好,并表现出高度多样化的本地化表达。即使是在穆斯林社会中,反犹主义也与基督教神学有关,而且不像伊斯兰恐惧症那样具有全球性。关键问题是:我们如何理解反犹太主义和伊斯兰恐惧症全球化的文化条件?为了回答这个问题,本文简要介绍了中国和印度文明中的伊斯兰恐惧症和反犹主义,然后介绍了文化模型理论。伊斯兰恐惧症是一个或多或少相似的文化模式的家庭,属于跨越时间和空间的不同文化范围。这就是为什么伊斯兰恐惧症是一种强烈的全球化偏见这个问题的一般答案。伊斯兰恐惧症应该被定义为在不同社会中发现的一些重叠的文化模式。今天,由于跨国和全球交流的加强,各地的伊斯兰恐惧症似乎接触得更密切,趋同,有时甚至交换因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Religion and Violence
Journal of Religion and Violence Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Not by Valor or Victory Alone: Religious Agency in the Apotheosis of the Chinese Warrior Hero in advance Evangelical Identity and QAnon in advance QAnon as Religious Terrorism in advance QAnon as an Online-Facilitated Cult in advance America’s Holy Trinity: How Conspiracism, Apocalypticism, and Persecution Narratives Set Us up for Crisis in advance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1