Doing critical and creative research in adult education

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Studies in the Education of Adults-NIACE Pub Date : 2021-09-20 DOI:10.1080/02660830.2022.2055731
J. Derrick
{"title":"Doing critical and creative research in adult education","authors":"J. Derrick","doi":"10.1080/02660830.2022.2055731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This very welcome collection presents 17 different methodological approaches to adult education research, each illustrated by a relevant case study, together with a useful introduction and overview. The papers are organised uneasily into 8 sections based on different broad methodological approaches: uneasily because, as the editors point out in their introduction, adult education itself, and the field of adult education research, are not well-defined. Furthermore, different methodological approaches often overlap, so that the result, almost inevitably, is an uneven spread of papers between the different sections of the book. Individual chapters focus on biographical research, oral history and storytelling (4 papers); ethnographic and auto-ethnographic studies (2 papers); arts-based and pedagogical research (3 papers); digital research methods (1 paper); sound and visual research (2 papers); embodied and movement research (2 papers); mixed methods and quantitative research (2 papers), and a final chapter on creative dissemination. The majority of these highlight the methodological issues raised by the inclusion of the voices of adult learners, both as research informants and as researchers in their own right, and of the centrality of dialogic modes of interaction with research subjects. These chapters are framed by the editorial introduction, which clearly establishes the book ’ s theoretical starting points: that (a) the field of adult education research does not have clearly-agreed boundaries; (b) that this fuzziness aligns well with the broadly-domin-ant epistemology of the field of adult education, which the editors see as ‘ a democratic and collaborative ethic which seeks to identify and foster progressive transformative possibilities for individuals, communities and society through research, teaching and learning ’ ; (c) that some research methodologies are nevertheless characteristic and more appropriate to the field than others; (d) that these broad methodological approaches typically feature, at least to some extent, both the involvement of their research subjects as co-researchers, and an explicit pedagogical purpose among the research objectives: that is, to benefit its research subjects","PeriodicalId":42210,"journal":{"name":"Studies in the Education of Adults-NIACE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in the Education of Adults-NIACE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2022.2055731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This very welcome collection presents 17 different methodological approaches to adult education research, each illustrated by a relevant case study, together with a useful introduction and overview. The papers are organised uneasily into 8 sections based on different broad methodological approaches: uneasily because, as the editors point out in their introduction, adult education itself, and the field of adult education research, are not well-defined. Furthermore, different methodological approaches often overlap, so that the result, almost inevitably, is an uneven spread of papers between the different sections of the book. Individual chapters focus on biographical research, oral history and storytelling (4 papers); ethnographic and auto-ethnographic studies (2 papers); arts-based and pedagogical research (3 papers); digital research methods (1 paper); sound and visual research (2 papers); embodied and movement research (2 papers); mixed methods and quantitative research (2 papers), and a final chapter on creative dissemination. The majority of these highlight the methodological issues raised by the inclusion of the voices of adult learners, both as research informants and as researchers in their own right, and of the centrality of dialogic modes of interaction with research subjects. These chapters are framed by the editorial introduction, which clearly establishes the book ’ s theoretical starting points: that (a) the field of adult education research does not have clearly-agreed boundaries; (b) that this fuzziness aligns well with the broadly-domin-ant epistemology of the field of adult education, which the editors see as ‘ a democratic and collaborative ethic which seeks to identify and foster progressive transformative possibilities for individuals, communities and society through research, teaching and learning ’ ; (c) that some research methodologies are nevertheless characteristic and more appropriate to the field than others; (d) that these broad methodological approaches typically feature, at least to some extent, both the involvement of their research subjects as co-researchers, and an explicit pedagogical purpose among the research objectives: that is, to benefit its research subjects
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在成人教育中进行批判性和创造性的研究
这本非常受欢迎的合集介绍了17种不同的成人教育研究方法,每种方法都有一个相关的案例研究,以及有用的介绍和概述。这些论文根据不同的广泛的方法方法被组织成8个部分,这让人感到不安:正如编辑们在引言中指出的那样,之所以这样做,是因为成人教育本身以及成人教育研究领域并没有得到明确的定义。此外,不同的方法方法经常重叠,因此,几乎不可避免的是,在书的不同部分之间的论文分布不均匀。个别章节侧重于传记研究,口述历史和讲故事(4篇论文);民族志和自动民族志研究(2篇论文);艺术基础与教学研究(3篇论文);数字化研究方法(1篇);声音和视觉研究(2篇论文);具身与运动研究(2篇);混合方法和定量研究(2篇论文),最后一章是关于创意传播。其中大多数强调了纳入成人学习者的声音所引起的方法问题,无论是作为研究信息提供者还是作为自己的研究人员,以及与研究对象互动的对话模式的中心地位。这些章节是由编辑导言构成的,它清楚地确立了本书的理论起点:(a)成人教育研究领域没有明确商定的边界;(b)这种模糊性与成人教育领域广泛占主导地位的认识论很好地一致,编辑们将其视为“一种民主和协作的伦理,旨在通过研究、教学和学习来识别和促进个人、社区和社会的进步变革可能性”;(c)尽管如此,某些研究方法仍具有特色,比其他方法更适合该领域;(d)这些广泛的方法论方法通常至少在某种程度上具有研究对象作为共同研究人员参与的特点,并且在研究目标中有明确的教学目的:即使研究对象受益
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in the Education of Adults-NIACE
Studies in the Education of Adults-NIACE EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
17.60%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Maternal health literacy and postpartum complication readiness among nursing mothers: Implications for adult literacy educators in Southern Cross River State, Nigeria Multilingual language assistants, investment and social justice in second language learning for adult newcomers Lifelong learning: The red-headed stepchild of Lebanon’s National Strategy for Older People Adult migrants’ voices about learning and using Swedish at work placements in basic language education Learning and gender in everyday life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1