{"title":"Food and nutrition labelling as a nutrition education tool: understanding, perspectives and practices of South African dietitians.","authors":"C. Chin, M. Wicks, M. Feyasa, N. Koen","doi":"10.1080/16070658.2022.2135186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Food and nutrition labelling is an effective tool to address diet-related non-communicable diseases (NCDs), in which nutrition education plays an integral role. Objectives: To investigate South African dietitians’ understanding, perspectives and practices of food and nutrition labelling as a nutrition education tool. Design: A quantitative descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted. Setting: A nationwide survey was undertaken of dietitians from all sectors of practice. Subjects: Dietitians registered with the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) (n = 137). Outcome measures: A self-administered electronic survey was used for data collection. Results: Awareness of labelling regulations was high (86.9%); however, confidence in knowledge of regulations was lacking (53.3%), as well as knowledge regarding food-labelling regulations (R146) (52.6%). More than half (57.7%) regarded labels as relevant to their daily work and 51.8% used labels frequently, varying use depending on client needs. For education purposes, the nutrition information table (75.2%), client-specific nutrients (70.0%) and health endorsement logos (HELs) (59.2%) were most frequently used. Product healthiness was mainly evaluated using the cooking method (86.1%), level of processing (67.9%) and product category (63.5%). Least used aspects were origin/certification claims (39.4%) and animal husbandry (34.3%). Highly rated aspects included belief in label efficacy (88.3%), accuracy (81.8%), a positive attitude (87.6%) and relevance (80.2%). Conclusion: To promote optimal use of labelling as a nutrition education tool, standardisation, trustworthiness and continuing education should be addressed. Furthermore, the urgent promulgation of the draft food labelling regulations will address existing barriers to label use.","PeriodicalId":45938,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":"36 1","pages":"108 - 117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16070658.2022.2135186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Introduction: Food and nutrition labelling is an effective tool to address diet-related non-communicable diseases (NCDs), in which nutrition education plays an integral role. Objectives: To investigate South African dietitians’ understanding, perspectives and practices of food and nutrition labelling as a nutrition education tool. Design: A quantitative descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted. Setting: A nationwide survey was undertaken of dietitians from all sectors of practice. Subjects: Dietitians registered with the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) (n = 137). Outcome measures: A self-administered electronic survey was used for data collection. Results: Awareness of labelling regulations was high (86.9%); however, confidence in knowledge of regulations was lacking (53.3%), as well as knowledge regarding food-labelling regulations (R146) (52.6%). More than half (57.7%) regarded labels as relevant to their daily work and 51.8% used labels frequently, varying use depending on client needs. For education purposes, the nutrition information table (75.2%), client-specific nutrients (70.0%) and health endorsement logos (HELs) (59.2%) were most frequently used. Product healthiness was mainly evaluated using the cooking method (86.1%), level of processing (67.9%) and product category (63.5%). Least used aspects were origin/certification claims (39.4%) and animal husbandry (34.3%). Highly rated aspects included belief in label efficacy (88.3%), accuracy (81.8%), a positive attitude (87.6%) and relevance (80.2%). Conclusion: To promote optimal use of labelling as a nutrition education tool, standardisation, trustworthiness and continuing education should be addressed. Furthermore, the urgent promulgation of the draft food labelling regulations will address existing barriers to label use.
期刊介绍:
1.The Journal accepts articles from all basic and applied areas of dietetics and human nutrition, including clinical nutrition, community nutrition, food science, food policy, food service management, nutrition policy and public health nutrition. 2.The Journal has a broad interpretation of the field of nutrition and recognizes that there are many factors that determine nutritional status and that need to be the subject of scientific investigation and reported in the Journal. 3.The Journal seeks to serve a broad readership and to provide information that will be useful to the scientific community, the academic community, government and non-government stakeholders in the nutrition field, policy makers and industry.