Rethinking the political in the pluriverse: The ethico-political significance of care

IF 1.1 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of International Political Theory Pub Date : 2023-06-05 DOI:10.1177/17550882231178884
M. FitzGerald
{"title":"Rethinking the political in the pluriverse: The ethico-political significance of care","authors":"M. FitzGerald","doi":"10.1177/17550882231178884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Postfoundational political thought is characterized by a distinction between “politics” (a socio-symbolic order that delineates what is knowable and thinkable) and “the political” (the instantiation of a socio-symbolic order). This article critically engages with the postfoundational thought of Jacques Rancière to rethink “the political” in the context of the pluriverse, a matrix of multiple distinct yet interconnected worlds. In so doing, this article challenges the idea that “care” is not properly political. Specifically, I argue that in the context of the pluriverse, socio-symbolic orders, or worlds, are not instantiated as such; rather, they must be established and, importantly, reestablished in the face of one another. From this vantage point, caring for and maintaining worlds—especially worlds marginalized by relations of power in the global political economy—is of political and ethical significance. This article thus offers a decolonial and feminist approach to thinking about the political as it (a) destabilizes the Westerncentric assumption that there is one-world, and takes different worlds as worlds seriously; and (b) centers issues of care and reproduction, demonstrates how they are politically and ethically salient, and thereby contributes to the project of foregrounding the political import of care.","PeriodicalId":44237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Political Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Political Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17550882231178884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Postfoundational political thought is characterized by a distinction between “politics” (a socio-symbolic order that delineates what is knowable and thinkable) and “the political” (the instantiation of a socio-symbolic order). This article critically engages with the postfoundational thought of Jacques Rancière to rethink “the political” in the context of the pluriverse, a matrix of multiple distinct yet interconnected worlds. In so doing, this article challenges the idea that “care” is not properly political. Specifically, I argue that in the context of the pluriverse, socio-symbolic orders, or worlds, are not instantiated as such; rather, they must be established and, importantly, reestablished in the face of one another. From this vantage point, caring for and maintaining worlds—especially worlds marginalized by relations of power in the global political economy—is of political and ethical significance. This article thus offers a decolonial and feminist approach to thinking about the political as it (a) destabilizes the Westerncentric assumption that there is one-world, and takes different worlds as worlds seriously; and (b) centers issues of care and reproduction, demonstrates how they are politically and ethically salient, and thereby contributes to the project of foregrounding the political import of care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多元宇宙中的政治反思:关怀的伦理-政治意义
后基础政治思想的特点是“政治”(描述可知和可思考的社会符号秩序)和“政治”(社会符号秩序的实例化)之间的区别。本文批判性地运用雅克·朗西的后基础主义思想,在多元世界的背景下重新思考“政治”,这是一个由多个不同但相互联系的世界组成的矩阵。在这样做的过程中,本文挑战了“关心”与政治无关的观点。具体来说,我认为在多元宇宙的背景下,社会符号秩序或世界并没有这样的实例化;相反,它们必须建立起来,更重要的是,必须在彼此面前重新建立起来。从这个角度来看,关心和维护世界——尤其是在全球政治经济中被权力关系边缘化的世界——具有政治和伦理意义。因此,本文提供了一种非殖民化和女权主义的方法来思考政治,因为它(a)动摇了西方中心的假设,即存在一个世界,并将不同的世界视为世界;(b)关注护理和生育问题,证明它们在政治上和伦理上是如何突出的,从而有助于突出护理的政治重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
The global dimension of domestic regulatory agencies: Why do we need a networked perspective of political legitimacy? Arguing and bargaining in international forums: The need for a novel approach The peace/violence nexus: Fundamental, multiple, contingent Dialectical Insights for Global IR: Forum on Snapshots from Home Buddhism, quantum theory and international relations: On the strength of the subject, the discontinuous relationality, and the world of contingency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1