Problems of Practical Implementation of the Procedure of Special Pre-Trial Investigation (in Absentia) in Ukraine

Anton Tymofeiev
{"title":"Problems of Practical Implementation of the Procedure of Special Pre-Trial Investigation (in Absentia) in Ukraine","authors":"Anton Tymofeiev","doi":"10.18523/2617-2607.2021.8.60-68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reveals the development and functioning of the institute of special pre-trial investigation in Ukraine. The genesis of the origin and implementation of a special pre-trial investigation in the current Criminal Procedure Code is determined. The changes from April 21, 2021 to the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine are analyzed in order to improve the functioning of this institution in terms of grounds for execution, delivery of subpoenas, obtaining a permit for detention in absentia, etc. The aspect of delivery of subpoenas is considered, which is related to the difficulty of proving the fact of receiving subpoenas by person and the practice of the ECHR and international conventions, which partially contradict the existing procedure. The decisions of the European Court of Human Rights are described, which indicate a violation of the person’s right to defense in connection with the implementation of a special pre-trial investigation. Negative aspects of the experience regarding the interaction of investigative units with the Interpol NCB have been identified, as well as the reasons for the latter’s refusal to include persons in the Interpol NCB databases and to declare persons internationally wanted. The unresolved issues with the subject and the moment of appointment of a defense counsel during the special pre-trial investigation procedure are described, which causes difficulties and contradictory decisions of national courts in this regard. The existing issues concerning the inconsistency of legal acts, which indicate the grounds for a special pre-trial investigation and the need to determine these grounds only in the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. The need to enshrine the legal obligation of the investigator or prosecutor to reopen criminal proceedings at the time of consideration of a request for a special pre-trial investigation in order to avoid the return of these requests by the investigating judge has been revealed. The positive changes in the aspect of obtaining an indefinite detention order in respect of persons subject to a special pre-trial investigation have been analyzed, which will simplify international legal assistance regarding their extradition.","PeriodicalId":34101,"journal":{"name":"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Iuridichni nauki","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Iuridichni nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-2607.2021.8.60-68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article reveals the development and functioning of the institute of special pre-trial investigation in Ukraine. The genesis of the origin and implementation of a special pre-trial investigation in the current Criminal Procedure Code is determined. The changes from April 21, 2021 to the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine are analyzed in order to improve the functioning of this institution in terms of grounds for execution, delivery of subpoenas, obtaining a permit for detention in absentia, etc. The aspect of delivery of subpoenas is considered, which is related to the difficulty of proving the fact of receiving subpoenas by person and the practice of the ECHR and international conventions, which partially contradict the existing procedure. The decisions of the European Court of Human Rights are described, which indicate a violation of the person’s right to defense in connection with the implementation of a special pre-trial investigation. Negative aspects of the experience regarding the interaction of investigative units with the Interpol NCB have been identified, as well as the reasons for the latter’s refusal to include persons in the Interpol NCB databases and to declare persons internationally wanted. The unresolved issues with the subject and the moment of appointment of a defense counsel during the special pre-trial investigation procedure are described, which causes difficulties and contradictory decisions of national courts in this regard. The existing issues concerning the inconsistency of legal acts, which indicate the grounds for a special pre-trial investigation and the need to determine these grounds only in the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. The need to enshrine the legal obligation of the investigator or prosecutor to reopen criminal proceedings at the time of consideration of a request for a special pre-trial investigation in order to avoid the return of these requests by the investigating judge has been revealed. The positive changes in the aspect of obtaining an indefinite detention order in respect of persons subject to a special pre-trial investigation have been analyzed, which will simplify international legal assistance regarding their extradition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌克兰特别审前调查(缺席)程序的实际实施问题
文章揭示了乌克兰审前特别调查研究所的发展和运作情况。确定了现行《刑事诉讼法》中审前特别调查的起源和实施。分析了2021年4月21日对《乌克兰刑事诉讼法》的修改,以改善该机构在执行理由、传票送达、获得缺席拘留许可等方面的运作,这与难以证明亲自收到传票的事实以及《欧洲人权公约》和国际公约的做法有关,这些做法与现有程序部分矛盾。对欧洲人权法院的裁决进行了说明,这些裁决表明,在实施审前特别调查方面侵犯了当事人的辩护权。已经查明了调查单位与国际刑警组织国家编目局互动的负面经验,以及后者拒绝将人员列入国际刑警组织的国家编目局数据库和宣布国际通缉人员的原因。描述了在审前特别调查程序中与该主题和指定辩护律师的时机有关的未解决问题,这些问题造成了国家法院在这方面的困难和相互矛盾的裁决。法律行为不一致的现有问题表明了进行特别审前调查的理由,以及只有在乌克兰《刑事诉讼法》中才能确定这些理由的必要性。有必要规定调查员或检察官在审议审前特别调查请求时重新提起刑事诉讼的法律义务,以避免调查法官再次提出这些请求。分析了对接受特别审前调查的人在获得无限期拘留令方面的积极变化,这将简化关于引渡他们的国际法律援助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perspectives for the Application of Remote Justice after COVID-19 Pandemic The Rule of Law and the Welfare State: The Ways to Overcome Contradictions Concept of Guidelines of Release from Punishment EU Law in Non-EU Countries: Reflections on Ukrainian Supreme Court’s Jurisprudence on Energy Matters Situation Model of the Next Stage of Court Proceedings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1