A Parsimonious Equity?: Discussion of Equity: Conscience Goes to Market

Q3 Social Sciences Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3289735
Samuel L. Bray
{"title":"A Parsimonious Equity?: Discussion of Equity: Conscience Goes to Market","authors":"Samuel L. Bray","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3289735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay, forthcoming in the Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies, analyzes Irit Samet's book \"Equity: Conscience Goes to Market\" (2018). It offers praise for Samet's illumination of conscience in equity, while also raising several critical questions. In particular, this essay argues that Samet offers a too minimal equity, which in her account is distinguished from law only by the centrality of conscience and the profusion of standards. The essay concludes with three questions: what of equity's dangers? do the social and institutional conditions exist for a thick morality in equity? and is Samet offering an internal or external perspective on equity?","PeriodicalId":36820,"journal":{"name":"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3289735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay, forthcoming in the Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies, analyzes Irit Samet's book "Equity: Conscience Goes to Market" (2018). It offers praise for Samet's illumination of conscience in equity, while also raising several critical questions. In particular, this essay argues that Samet offers a too minimal equity, which in her account is distinguished from law only by the centrality of conscience and the profusion of standards. The essay concludes with three questions: what of equity's dangers? do the social and institutional conditions exist for a thick morality in equity? and is Samet offering an internal or external perspective on equity?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吝啬的股权?:讨论公平:良心走向市场
这篇即将发表在《耶路撒冷法律研究评论》上的文章分析了伊里特·萨梅特(Irit Samet)的著作《公平:良心走向市场》(2018)。它赞扬了萨梅特对公平良知的阐释,同时也提出了几个关键问题。特别是,这篇文章认为,Samet提供的公平太少了,在她的叙述中,它与法律的区别仅仅在于良心的中心地位和标准的丰富。这篇文章最后提出了三个问题:公平的危险是什么?厚厚的公平道德是否具备社会和制度条件?Samet提供的是内部还是外部的公平观点?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies
Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Personalized Law: Different Rules for Different People Unstable Personalized Law Personalizing Personalized Law: Discussion of “Personalized Law” Personalized Law and the Depersonalization of the Person Personalized Behavioral Regulation Is Here: What Lessons for “Personalized Law”?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1