Ready or Not, Here I Come: A Scoping Review of Methods Used to Assess Player Readiness Via Indicators of Neuromuscular Function in Football Code Athletes

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Strength and Conditioning Journal Pub Date : 2022-08-19 DOI:10.1519/SSC.0000000000000735
Brian Guthrie, A. Jagim, Margaret T. Jones
{"title":"Ready or Not, Here I Come: A Scoping Review of Methods Used to Assess Player Readiness Via Indicators of Neuromuscular Function in Football Code Athletes","authors":"Brian Guthrie, A. Jagim, Margaret T. Jones","doi":"10.1519/SSC.0000000000000735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A scoping review methodology was used to assess player readiness via indicators of neuromuscular function in response to training load. Literature search included PubMed, Web of Science, SportDiscus, and CINAHL. Search strategy was based on Population-Concept-Context framework evaluating football code athletes with the focus on player readiness in the context of longitudinal monitoring across quantified training loads with an emphasis on neuromuscular function. Demographics, frequency of data collection, methods of monitoring readiness, neuromuscular function, duration of monitoring period, and quantification of training loads were reported. Authors independently reviewed articles and, in the case of disagreement, a vote determined inclusion. The sports of rugby (n = 13) and soccer (n = 11) were most frequently examined, followed by Australian Rules Football (n = 6) and American Football (n = 1). The most common methods assessed systemic readiness with the primary focus on jump and sprint testing. Findings identified limited evidence supporting structural and tissue-specific monitoring tools. Player readiness assessment strategies have evolved with advances in technology and analytics. It is recommended that future research focus on a variety of populations, including youth and women athletes. This review is the first to summarize methods of assessing player readiness using indicators of neuromuscular function in football code athletes.","PeriodicalId":21993,"journal":{"name":"Strength and Conditioning Journal","volume":"45 1","pages":"93 - 110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strength and Conditioning Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0000000000000735","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT A scoping review methodology was used to assess player readiness via indicators of neuromuscular function in response to training load. Literature search included PubMed, Web of Science, SportDiscus, and CINAHL. Search strategy was based on Population-Concept-Context framework evaluating football code athletes with the focus on player readiness in the context of longitudinal monitoring across quantified training loads with an emphasis on neuromuscular function. Demographics, frequency of data collection, methods of monitoring readiness, neuromuscular function, duration of monitoring period, and quantification of training loads were reported. Authors independently reviewed articles and, in the case of disagreement, a vote determined inclusion. The sports of rugby (n = 13) and soccer (n = 11) were most frequently examined, followed by Australian Rules Football (n = 6) and American Football (n = 1). The most common methods assessed systemic readiness with the primary focus on jump and sprint testing. Findings identified limited evidence supporting structural and tissue-specific monitoring tools. Player readiness assessment strategies have evolved with advances in technology and analytics. It is recommended that future research focus on a variety of populations, including youth and women athletes. This review is the first to summarize methods of assessing player readiness using indicators of neuromuscular function in football code athletes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
准备好与否,我来了:通过足球规范运动员的神经肌肉功能指标评估球员准备情况的方法综述
摘要:采用范围审查方法,通过神经肌肉功能指标对训练负荷的反应来评估球员的准备情况。文献检索包括PubMed、Web of Science、SportDiscus和CINAHL。搜索策略基于人口概念上下文框架,评估足球代码运动员,重点是在量化训练负荷的纵向监测背景下的球员准备情况,重点是神经肌肉功能。报告了人口统计学、数据收集频率、监测准备状态的方法、神经肌肉功能、监测期的持续时间和训练负荷的量化。作者独立审查文章,如果意见不一致,则通过投票决定入选。橄榄球(n=13)和足球(n=11)是最常见的检查项目,其次是澳大利亚规则足球(n=6)和美式足球(n=1)。最常见的方法评估系统准备情况,主要关注跳跃和冲刺测试。研究结果表明,支持结构和组织特异性监测工具的证据有限。球员准备状态评估策略随着技术和分析的进步而发展。建议未来的研究重点关注各种人群,包括青年和女运动员。这篇综述首次总结了在足球规范运动员中使用神经肌肉功能指标评估球员准备状态的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Strength and Conditioning Journal
Strength and Conditioning Journal 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Strength and Conditioning Journal is the professional journal for strength coaches, personal trainers, physical therapists, athletic trainers, and other health professionals working in the strength and conditioning field. The journal’s mission is to publish articles that report both the practical applications of research findings and the knowledge gained by experienced professionals.
期刊最新文献
Types and Contributors to Occupational Fatigue The Use of Global Positioning Systems Devices to Measure Maximum Velocity in Field-Based Team Sport Athletes: A Narrative Review Effect of Using Different Intensities in Resistance Training for Muscle Hypertrophy Gains—A Narrative Review Preparing Basketball Players for Competition During COVID-19 Lockdown: An International Strength and Conditioning Perspective Selection of Key Performance Indicators for Your Sport and Program: Proposing a Complementary Process-Driven Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1