How Do Religious People Become Atheists? Applying a Grounded Theory Approach to Propose a Model of Deconversion

IF 1.7 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Secularism & Nonreligion Pub Date : 2019-04-24 DOI:10.5334/snr.108
Sergio Pérez, F. Vallières
{"title":"How Do Religious People Become Atheists? Applying a Grounded Theory Approach to Propose a Model of Deconversion","authors":"Sergio Pérez, F. Vallières","doi":"10.5334/snr.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The influence of organized religion is decreasing in the West, and trends show a growing number of people abandoning their religious beliefs, or deconverting. However, this phenomenon has received relatively little attention in the psychology of religion. The current study asks “How do religious people become atheists?” and aims to further the understanding of the process of religious deconversion by offering a proposed model of deconversion. The main findings within the literature are examined, and consideration is given to the concept of deconversion itself and to biases within the psychology of religion. Employing an inductive grounded theory approach based on Strauss and Corbin’s guidelines, we investigated the process of deconversion among a sample of atheist individuals who previously identified as religious. The data consists of 30 testimonies obtained from former clergypersons and six semi-structured interviews with atheist participants recruited through an advocacy group. The resulting model of deconversion is comprised of three core categories: reason and enquiry, criticism and discontent, and personal development. Despite being closely interlinked, these categories were clearly distinct and represent an intellectual impetus, moral and ethical judgments of religion, and overcoming personal issues, respectively. For all participants deconversion developed gradually within the close context of family and local community and the wider cultural context of society at large. Findings are discussed in relation to previous research and psychological theory.","PeriodicalId":42349,"journal":{"name":"Secularism & Nonreligion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Secularism & Nonreligion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/snr.108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The influence of organized religion is decreasing in the West, and trends show a growing number of people abandoning their religious beliefs, or deconverting. However, this phenomenon has received relatively little attention in the psychology of religion. The current study asks “How do religious people become atheists?” and aims to further the understanding of the process of religious deconversion by offering a proposed model of deconversion. The main findings within the literature are examined, and consideration is given to the concept of deconversion itself and to biases within the psychology of religion. Employing an inductive grounded theory approach based on Strauss and Corbin’s guidelines, we investigated the process of deconversion among a sample of atheist individuals who previously identified as religious. The data consists of 30 testimonies obtained from former clergypersons and six semi-structured interviews with atheist participants recruited through an advocacy group. The resulting model of deconversion is comprised of three core categories: reason and enquiry, criticism and discontent, and personal development. Despite being closely interlinked, these categories were clearly distinct and represent an intellectual impetus, moral and ethical judgments of religion, and overcoming personal issues, respectively. For all participants deconversion developed gradually within the close context of family and local community and the wider cultural context of society at large. Findings are discussed in relation to previous research and psychological theory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教人士如何成为无神论者?应用扎根理论方法提出解构模型
在西方,有组织的宗教的影响正在减弱,有趋势表明,越来越多的人放弃了他们的宗教信仰,或者改信其他宗教。然而,这一现象在宗教心理学中受到的关注相对较少。目前的研究问道:“宗教人士是如何变成无神论者的?”,旨在通过提供一个拟议的反宗教化模型来进一步理解宗教反宗教化的过程。对文献中的主要发现进行了检查,并考虑了反version本身的概念和宗教心理学中的偏见。采用基于施特劳斯和科尔宾的指导方针的归纳扎根理论方法,我们调查了以前被认定为宗教的无神论者个体样本的反信仰过程。这些数据包括从前神职人员那里获得的30份证词,以及通过一个倡导团体招募的对无神论者的6次半结构化采访。由此产生的反解构模型由三个核心类别组成:理性与探究,批评与不满,以及个人发展。尽管密切相关,但这些类别明显不同,分别代表了智力动力,宗教的道德和伦理判断以及克服个人问题。对于所有参与者来说,在家庭和当地社区的密切背景下以及整个社会的更广泛的文化背景下,解构逐渐发展起来。研究结果与先前的研究和心理学理论有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
3
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Dreaming On: Dying Behaviour and the Romantic-Individualist Ethos The Social Imaginary of Science and Nonreligion: Narrating the Connection in the Anglophone West Seeing is Believing: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of the Experiences of the ‘Spiritual But Not Religious’ in Britain Advancing the Study of Nonreligion through Feminist Methods Is Secularism Too Western? Disputes Around Offending Pictures of Muhammad and the Virgin Mary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1