Survival rate of dental implants installed by postgraduate students attending an implantology program in Brazil: A 52-month retrospective analysis

IF 1.5 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Frontiers in dental medicine Pub Date : 2023-04-18 DOI:10.3389/fdmed.2023.1170253
Myung-Hun Kang, Henrique Smanio Neto, A. Pelegrine, C. Turssi, J. Clemente-Napimoga, M. Napimoga
{"title":"Survival rate of dental implants installed by postgraduate students attending an implantology program in Brazil: A 52-month retrospective analysis","authors":"Myung-Hun Kang, Henrique Smanio Neto, A. Pelegrine, C. Turssi, J. Clemente-Napimoga, M. Napimoga","doi":"10.3389/fdmed.2023.1170253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the survival rate and identify possible risk factors for failure of dental implants placed by postgraduate students in Implantology at a Brazilian Dental School. Materials & methods A retrospective observational study was conducted to evaluate 1,164 dental implants placed by postgraduate students in Implantology at São Leopoldo Mandic Dental School (Brazil) during a 3-year time period (2018–2020). Data collected from the patients' medical charts included the following: implant loss, gender, diabetes, smoking, continuous use of medication, type of implant connection system, implant position (maxilla or mandible), previous bone grafting and type of prosthetic provisioning (temporary prosthesis, immediate prosthesis or permanent prosthesis). The association between all the independent variables and implant loss was run using χ2 and G tests (α = 5%). The implant survival rate was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curve. Results Gender, diabetes, smoking, continuous use of medication, type of implant connection system, implant position, previous bone grafting and type of prosthetic provisioning showed no statistically significant association with implant loss. Of the 1,164 implants installed, 29 (2.5%) failed. The overall survival rate of dental implants placed by postgraduate students up to 52 months was 90.5% (IC95%: 74.5%–96.7%). Conclusions Implants placed by postgraduate students in Implantology at São Leopoldo Mandic Dental School showed a high survival rate, with gender, diabetes, smoking, continuous use of medication, type of implant connection system, implant position, previous bone grafting and type of prosthetic provisioning not accounting for the risk of implant failure.","PeriodicalId":73077,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in dental medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in dental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdmed.2023.1170253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the survival rate and identify possible risk factors for failure of dental implants placed by postgraduate students in Implantology at a Brazilian Dental School. Materials & methods A retrospective observational study was conducted to evaluate 1,164 dental implants placed by postgraduate students in Implantology at São Leopoldo Mandic Dental School (Brazil) during a 3-year time period (2018–2020). Data collected from the patients' medical charts included the following: implant loss, gender, diabetes, smoking, continuous use of medication, type of implant connection system, implant position (maxilla or mandible), previous bone grafting and type of prosthetic provisioning (temporary prosthesis, immediate prosthesis or permanent prosthesis). The association between all the independent variables and implant loss was run using χ2 and G tests (α = 5%). The implant survival rate was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curve. Results Gender, diabetes, smoking, continuous use of medication, type of implant connection system, implant position, previous bone grafting and type of prosthetic provisioning showed no statistically significant association with implant loss. Of the 1,164 implants installed, 29 (2.5%) failed. The overall survival rate of dental implants placed by postgraduate students up to 52 months was 90.5% (IC95%: 74.5%–96.7%). Conclusions Implants placed by postgraduate students in Implantology at São Leopoldo Mandic Dental School showed a high survival rate, with gender, diabetes, smoking, continuous use of medication, type of implant connection system, implant position, previous bone grafting and type of prosthetic provisioning not accounting for the risk of implant failure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西种植学项目研究生种植牙的存活率:52个月的回顾性分析
目的本研究的目的是评估巴西牙科学校种植学研究生种植牙失败的存活率并确定可能的风险因素。材料与方法进行了一项回顾性观察性研究,以评估São Leopoldo Mandic牙科学校(巴西)种植学研究生在3年期间(2018-2020年)放置的1164个牙科植入物。从患者病历中收集的数据包括:植入物丢失、性别、糖尿病、吸烟、持续用药、植入物连接系统类型、植入物位置(上颌骨或下颌骨)、既往骨移植和假体供应类型(临时假体、即时假体或永久假体)。使用χ2和G检验(α = 5%)。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线估计植入物的存活率。结果性别、糖尿病、吸烟、持续用药、种植体连接系统类型、种植体位置、既往骨移植和假体供应类型与种植体损失无统计学意义。在安装的1164个植入物中,29个(2.5%)失败。研究生种植牙52个月的总生存率为90.5%(IC95%:74.5%-96.7%),以前的骨移植和假体供应类型没有考虑植入失败的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
3D-printed resin composite posterior fixed dental prosthesis: a prospective clinical trial up to 1 year Unique root anatomy of mandibular second premolars: clinical strategies for effective disinfection and preservation of dentine structure in root canal treatment—a case report Editorial: Debates in regenerative dentistry Variability of salivary analytes under daily conditions and their implications for periodontitis biomarkers The importance of visual acuity screening in dental education amongst undergraduate dental students: a straightforward method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1