Performance Evaluation Optimization Model with a Hybrid Approach of NDEA-BSC and Stackelberg Game Theory in the Presence of Bad Data

Banihashemi Sayyid Ali, Khalilzadeh Mohammad
{"title":"Performance Evaluation Optimization Model with a Hybrid Approach of NDEA-BSC and Stackelberg Game Theory in the Presence of Bad Data","authors":"Banihashemi Sayyid Ali, Khalilzadeh Mohammad","doi":"10.24818/18423264/57.2.23.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The evaluation of organisational performance and internal power is of the most significance for any organisation. The purpose of this paper is to present a hybrid approach using Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA), BSC, and Game Theory to evaluate the performance of decision-making units. To evaluate the efficiency of each decision-making unit, the relationship between different departments within an organisation is modeled based on the BSC indicators (growth and learning perspective, internal processes perspective, customer perspective, and financial perspective). Also, the influence of each of the BSC indicators on the efficiency of the decision-making units is examined using Game Theory and Stackelberg Theory. Moreover, the indicators related to each aspect of the BSC are expressed as input/output to determine performance. The proposed model has been implemented in 15 different cement factories based on the information obtained in 2021. The results reveal that the customer perspective has the greatest impact on the performance of the entire organisation and plays a crucial leading role in the organisation. Among the followers, the perspective of internal processes that is influenced by the leader strategy (customer perspective) is ranked first, and the perspectives of growth, learning, and finance are ranked second, third, and fourth, respectively. This research facilitates managerial decision-making for the optimal allocation of resources to increase the performance and profitability of the organisation.","PeriodicalId":51029,"journal":{"name":"Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/18423264/57.2.23.18","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. The evaluation of organisational performance and internal power is of the most significance for any organisation. The purpose of this paper is to present a hybrid approach using Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA), BSC, and Game Theory to evaluate the performance of decision-making units. To evaluate the efficiency of each decision-making unit, the relationship between different departments within an organisation is modeled based on the BSC indicators (growth and learning perspective, internal processes perspective, customer perspective, and financial perspective). Also, the influence of each of the BSC indicators on the efficiency of the decision-making units is examined using Game Theory and Stackelberg Theory. Moreover, the indicators related to each aspect of the BSC are expressed as input/output to determine performance. The proposed model has been implemented in 15 different cement factories based on the information obtained in 2021. The results reveal that the customer perspective has the greatest impact on the performance of the entire organisation and plays a crucial leading role in the organisation. Among the followers, the perspective of internal processes that is influenced by the leader strategy (customer perspective) is ranked first, and the perspectives of growth, learning, and finance are ranked second, third, and fourth, respectively. This research facilitates managerial decision-making for the optimal allocation of resources to increase the performance and profitability of the organisation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不良数据下基于NDEA-BSC和Stackelberg博弈论混合方法的性能评价优化模型
.对组织绩效和内部权力的评估对任何组织来说都是最重要的。本文的目的是提出一种使用网络数据包络分析(NDEA)、平衡计分卡和博弈论的混合方法来评估决策单元的性能。为了评估每个决策单元的效率,基于BSC指标(增长和学习视角、内部流程视角、客户视角和财务视角)对组织内不同部门之间的关系进行建模。同时,运用博弈论和Stackelberg理论考察了BSC指标对决策单元效率的影响。此外,与BSC的每个方面相关的指标被表示为输入/输出,以确定性能。根据2021年获得的信息,该模型已在15家不同的水泥厂实施。结果表明,客户视角对整个组织的绩效影响最大,在组织中发挥着至关重要的领导作用。在追随者中,受领导者战略影响的内部流程视角(客户视角)排名第一,成长、学习和财务视角分别排名第二、第三和第四。这项研究促进了管理决策,以优化资源分配,从而提高组织的绩效和盈利能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research
Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ECECSR is a refereed journal dedicated to publication of original articles in the fields of economic mathematical modeling, operations research, microeconomics, macroeconomics, mathematical programming, statistical analysis, game theory, artificial intelligence, and other topics from theoretical development to research on applied economic problems. Published by the Academy of Economic Studies in Bucharest, it is the leading journal in the field of economic modeling from Romania.
期刊最新文献
Venture Capital and ESG Performance: Hindrance or Help Factors Influencing the Perception of Academic Researchers on Ethics in Marketing Research and Its Impact on Open Science Acceptance Causes and Consequences of Shadow Economy and its Impact on Economic Development What Factors Influence the Incremental Capital Output Ratio in 8 ASEAN Countries? The Impact of Digitalisation and Sustainability on Inclusiveness: Inclusive Growth Determinants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1