Performance measurement of complex project: framework and means supporting management of project-based organizations

Eryk Glodzinski
{"title":"Performance measurement of complex project: framework and means supporting management of project-based organizations","authors":"Eryk Glodzinski","doi":"10.12821/ijispm070202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Performance management and measurement enable to improve strategy implementation and increase organizational competitiveness. The literature review and desk research confirm that the design of a performance system is an issue because of the redefinition of project environment conditions and complexity of 4P. The system should be continuously developed during exploitation. Main objectives of the paper are to propose a framework of project performance measurement and a set of measures that could be applied in project-based organizations. The assessment proposal is the result of a literature review and qualitative empirical studies, interviews, and participatory observations. The framework considers performance assessment of the project and its context, including benefits occurring outside the project – on the program, project portfolio, and project-based organization levels – but being the result of project execution. The framework incorporates in project performance assessment the simultaneous and supplementary utilization of quantitative and qualitative measures, financial and non-financial measures that describe various fields of evaluation: finance, production, procurement, product quality, social, marketing of a product, legal, natural environment, client, and other stakeholders’ satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":43984,"journal":{"name":"IJISPM-International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJISPM-International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm070202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Performance management and measurement enable to improve strategy implementation and increase organizational competitiveness. The literature review and desk research confirm that the design of a performance system is an issue because of the redefinition of project environment conditions and complexity of 4P. The system should be continuously developed during exploitation. Main objectives of the paper are to propose a framework of project performance measurement and a set of measures that could be applied in project-based organizations. The assessment proposal is the result of a literature review and qualitative empirical studies, interviews, and participatory observations. The framework considers performance assessment of the project and its context, including benefits occurring outside the project – on the program, project portfolio, and project-based organization levels – but being the result of project execution. The framework incorporates in project performance assessment the simultaneous and supplementary utilization of quantitative and qualitative measures, financial and non-financial measures that describe various fields of evaluation: finance, production, procurement, product quality, social, marketing of a product, legal, natural environment, client, and other stakeholders’ satisfaction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复杂项目的绩效衡量:支持项目组织管理的框架和手段
绩效管理和衡量能够改善战略实施,提高组织竞争力。文献综述和案头研究证实,由于项目环境条件的重新定义和4P的复杂性,绩效体系的设计是一个问题。在开发过程中,系统应不断发展。本文的主要目的是提出一个项目绩效衡量框架和一套可应用于项目型组织的措施。评估建议是文献综述和定性实证研究、访谈和参与性观察的结果。该框架考虑了项目及其环境的绩效评估,包括发生在项目之外的利益——在计划、项目组合和基于项目的组织层面上——但作为项目执行的结果。该框架在项目绩效评估中结合了定量和定性措施、财务和非财务措施的同时和补充利用,这些措施描述了评估的各个领域:财务、生产、采购、产品质量、产品的社会、营销、法律、自然环境、客户和其他利益相关者的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
99
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Digitalization of revenue mobilization in an emerging economy: the new Institutional Theory perspective Software developers reasoning behind adoption and use of software development methods – a systematic literature review The characteristics of successful military IT projects: a cross-country empirical study An agile portfolio management model for the insurance sector: the APMI model Towards a framework for developing visual analytics in supply chain environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1