{"title":"Void of Ethics No More: The Gospel of Mark and New Testament Ethics","authors":"John-Patrick O'Connor","doi":"10.1177/1476993X221077506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following article offers an overview of studies on the ethics of Mark in the last four decades. A longstanding tradition in biblical studies has been to render the second Evangelist void or nearly void of all ethical interest. Such disparaging conclusions in regard to the apparently ethically vacuous Gospel are representative in the comment by James Leslie Houlden: ‘For [Mark], as for John, it appears that facing and settling moral problems, in the everyday sense, was not a primary concern’ (Houlden, J.L. 1973 Ethics and the New Testament [Harmondsworth: Penguin]: 45). Scholarship on the Gospel of Mark has since turned a corner: a foray of studies has overturned the conclusion by James Houlden and countless others. The following article offers a summary of ethically sensitive studies of the Gospel of Mark with suggestions for further inquiry.","PeriodicalId":43066,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Biblical Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"165 - 185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Biblical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1476993X221077506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The following article offers an overview of studies on the ethics of Mark in the last four decades. A longstanding tradition in biblical studies has been to render the second Evangelist void or nearly void of all ethical interest. Such disparaging conclusions in regard to the apparently ethically vacuous Gospel are representative in the comment by James Leslie Houlden: ‘For [Mark], as for John, it appears that facing and settling moral problems, in the everyday sense, was not a primary concern’ (Houlden, J.L. 1973 Ethics and the New Testament [Harmondsworth: Penguin]: 45). Scholarship on the Gospel of Mark has since turned a corner: a foray of studies has overturned the conclusion by James Houlden and countless others. The following article offers a summary of ethically sensitive studies of the Gospel of Mark with suggestions for further inquiry.
下面的文章概述了近四十年来关于马克伦理学的研究。在圣经研究中,一个长期的传统一直是使第二福音传教士无效或几乎无效的所有伦理利益。这种贬低福音的结论在詹姆斯·莱斯利·霍尔登(James Leslie Houlden)的评论中很有代表性:“对于[马克],对于约翰来说,在日常意义上,面对和解决道德问题似乎不是主要关注的问题”(霍尔登,J.L. 1973 Ethics and the New Testament [Harmondsworth: Penguin]: 45)。此后,关于马可福音的学术研究出现了转折:一系列研究推翻了詹姆斯·霍尔登(James Houlden)和无数其他人的结论。下面的文章提供了对马可福音的伦理敏感研究的总结,并提出了进一步研究的建议。