Speculative Aetiology in Namwali Serpell’s The Old Drift: Towards a Decolonial Critique of History and Human

IF 0.2 N/A HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Gothic Studies Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.3366/gothic.2022.0140
Rebekah Cumpsty
{"title":"Speculative Aetiology in Namwali Serpell’s The Old Drift: Towards a Decolonial Critique of History and Human","authors":"Rebekah Cumpsty","doi":"10.3366/gothic.2022.0140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Namwali Serpell’s The Old Drift (2019) yokes together human, technological and ecological shifts in a sinister speculative register. While it seemingly corresponds to the posthuman Gothic, this framing is insufficient to describe gothic presentations of the postcolony where people are treated as inhuman surplus. Posthumanist approaches risk reinscribing the dehumanizing discourses that sustain coloniality as a social and environmental organization. The novel presents a two-fold decolonial critique. First, it irreverently rehearses Eurocentric Zambian history and the gothic tropes that enlivened it, only to decentre this account for a decolonial aetiology voiced by a mosquito hive mind. Second, given that history is a story of how the ‘human’ came to be, the figures of biological excess unsettle the colonial category ‘human.’ These interwoven strands of decolonial critique unseat colonial evolutionary teleology in favour of a plural, multispecies aetiology, best read through a decolonial ecoGothic lens that exposes coloniality as both an ecological and social project.","PeriodicalId":42443,"journal":{"name":"Gothic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gothic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/gothic.2022.0140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Namwali Serpell’s The Old Drift (2019) yokes together human, technological and ecological shifts in a sinister speculative register. While it seemingly corresponds to the posthuman Gothic, this framing is insufficient to describe gothic presentations of the postcolony where people are treated as inhuman surplus. Posthumanist approaches risk reinscribing the dehumanizing discourses that sustain coloniality as a social and environmental organization. The novel presents a two-fold decolonial critique. First, it irreverently rehearses Eurocentric Zambian history and the gothic tropes that enlivened it, only to decentre this account for a decolonial aetiology voiced by a mosquito hive mind. Second, given that history is a story of how the ‘human’ came to be, the figures of biological excess unsettle the colonial category ‘human.’ These interwoven strands of decolonial critique unseat colonial evolutionary teleology in favour of a plural, multispecies aetiology, best read through a decolonial ecoGothic lens that exposes coloniality as both an ecological and social project.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纳姆瓦利·斯贝尔的《旧的漂流:走向对历史和人类的非殖民化批判》中的思辨病因学
Namwali Serpell的《旧漂移》(2019)将人类、技术和生态的转变结合在一起,形成了一个险恶的投机记录。虽然它似乎与后人类哥特式相对应,但这种框架不足以描述后殖民时期的哥特式表现,在那里人们被视为不人道的剩余。后人文主义的方法有可能重新塑造维持殖民主义作为一个社会和环境组织的非人性化话语。这部小说提出了双重的非殖民化批判。首先,它不敬地排练了以欧洲为中心的赞比亚历史,以及使其充满活力的哥特式比喻,结果却将这一解释转移到了蚊子蜂窝思维所表达的非殖民化病因。其次,鉴于历史是一个关于“人类”如何形成的故事,生物过剩的数字让殖民地的“人类”类别感到不安这些交织在一起的非殖民化批判推翻了殖民进化目的论,转而支持多元、多物种的病因,最好通过非殖民化生态哥特式的视角来解读,将殖民主义暴露为一个生态和社会项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gothic Studies
Gothic Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Gothic Association considers the field of Gothic studies from the eighteenth century to the present day. Gothic Studies opens a forum for dialogue and cultural criticism, and provides a specialist journal for scholars working in a field which is today taught or researched in academic institutions around the globe. The journal invites contributions from scholars working within any period of the Gothic; interdisciplinary scholarship is especially welcome, as are studies of works across the range of media, beyond the written word.
期刊最新文献
‘A Melmoth? a cosmopolitan? a patriot?’: Melmoth the Wanderer's Russian Epigones ‘Endless circumlocutions’: Speaking To and Away from the Point Before and After Melmoth the Wanderer Melmoth Irreconcilable? Supersessionism and Jewish and Christian Responses to the Wandering Jew Legend From Melmoth to Maqroll: The Wanderer in Latin America Melmoth and the Irish Gothic Tradition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1