Palliation of malignant dysphagia: stent or radiotherapy?

L. Koggel, M. A. Lantinga, P. Siersema
{"title":"Palliation of malignant dysphagia: stent or radiotherapy?","authors":"L. Koggel, M. A. Lantinga, P. Siersema","doi":"10.21037/AOE-2020-MTEC-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Palliation of dysphagia forms the cornerstone in treating incurable esophageal cancer. The ultimate goal is to provide rapid and sustained relief of dysphagia. Optimal management is however a challenge as a single modality providing both rapid and sustained relief is not readily available. The two most commonly used modalities for palliative treatment of dysphagia include esophageal stent placement and radiotherapy. Treatment choice primarily depends on life-expectancy and dysphagia severity. Radiotherapy is preferred in those with a life-expectancy of more than three months as it is superior to stent placement with regard to effect duration. Regarding the former, short cycle external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is currently preferred over single-dose brachytherapy (BT) because of better clinical outcomes, lower toxicity and easier application. In contrast, if life-expectancy is less than three months, immediate relief of dysphagia is important and self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement is the preferred treatment. Although combining these two treatment modalities seems promising, evidence to support this is lacking. Placement of an irradiation stent has been suggested for patients with a reasonable life-expectancy, although placement requires a specifically-designed unit and experienced personnel. The research agenda should focus on further improving radiotherapy techniques, stent design, and effectiveness of combination therapy aiming to provide rapid and sustained dysphagia relief while maintaining quality of life.","PeriodicalId":72217,"journal":{"name":"Annals of esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/AOE-2020-MTEC-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Palliation of dysphagia forms the cornerstone in treating incurable esophageal cancer. The ultimate goal is to provide rapid and sustained relief of dysphagia. Optimal management is however a challenge as a single modality providing both rapid and sustained relief is not readily available. The two most commonly used modalities for palliative treatment of dysphagia include esophageal stent placement and radiotherapy. Treatment choice primarily depends on life-expectancy and dysphagia severity. Radiotherapy is preferred in those with a life-expectancy of more than three months as it is superior to stent placement with regard to effect duration. Regarding the former, short cycle external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is currently preferred over single-dose brachytherapy (BT) because of better clinical outcomes, lower toxicity and easier application. In contrast, if life-expectancy is less than three months, immediate relief of dysphagia is important and self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement is the preferred treatment. Although combining these two treatment modalities seems promising, evidence to support this is lacking. Placement of an irradiation stent has been suggested for patients with a reasonable life-expectancy, although placement requires a specifically-designed unit and experienced personnel. The research agenda should focus on further improving radiotherapy techniques, stent design, and effectiveness of combination therapy aiming to provide rapid and sustained dysphagia relief while maintaining quality of life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缓解恶性吞咽困难:支架还是放疗?
缓解吞咽困难是治疗无法治愈的食管癌的基石。最终目标是提供快速和持续的缓解吞咽困难。然而,最佳管理是一项挑战,因为提供快速和持续救济的单一方式并不容易获得。两种最常用的姑息性治疗吞咽困难的方式包括食管支架置入和放疗。治疗选择主要取决于预期寿命和吞咽困难的严重程度。对于那些预期寿命超过3个月的患者,放疗是首选,因为就效果持续时间而言,放疗优于支架置入术。对于前者,短周期外束放疗(EBRT)由于临床效果更好、毒性更低、应用更容易,目前比单剂量近距离放疗(BT)更受青睐。相反,如果预期寿命小于3个月,立即缓解吞咽困难是重要的,可自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)放置是首选的治疗方法。虽然结合这两种治疗方式似乎很有希望,但缺乏支持这一观点的证据。建议对预期寿命合理的患者放置辐照支架,尽管放置支架需要专门设计的单元和经验丰富的人员。研究议程应侧重于进一步改进放疗技术、支架设计和联合治疗的有效性,旨在提供快速和持续的吞咽困难缓解,同时保持生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differential impact of post-neoadjuvant stage on overall survival for surgically treated oesophageal cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation: a retrospective cohort study Endoluminal vacuum therapy using a fenestrated surgical drain for management of anastomotic leak following esophagectomy Hot potato causing full-thickness esophageal burn and perforation: a case report The sequel of age and frailty on the pathophysiology and treatment of surgical esophageal diseases Post-operative gastroesophageal reflux disease after one anastomosis gastric bypass, a narrative review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1