Application of controlled-release urea increases maize N uptake, environmental benefits and economic returns via optimizing temporal and spatial distributions of soil mineral N

IF 5.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Pedosphere Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pedsph.2023.09.001
Mingxue SUN , Juan LI , Lili ZHANG , Xiaomeng SU , Ning LIU , Xiaori HAN , Songjiang WU , Zhentao SUN , Xiangdong YANG
{"title":"Application of controlled-release urea increases maize N uptake, environmental benefits and economic returns via optimizing temporal and spatial distributions of soil mineral N","authors":"Mingxue SUN ,&nbsp;Juan LI ,&nbsp;Lili ZHANG ,&nbsp;Xiaomeng SU ,&nbsp;Ning LIU ,&nbsp;Xiaori HAN ,&nbsp;Songjiang WU ,&nbsp;Zhentao SUN ,&nbsp;Xiangdong YANG","doi":"10.1016/j.pedsph.2023.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The creation of controlled-release urea (CRU) is a potent substitute for conventional fertilizers in order to preserve the availability of nitrogen (N) in soil, prevent environmental pollution, and move toward green agriculture. The main objectives of this study were to assess the impacts of CRU's full application on maize production and to clarify the connection between the nutrient release pattern of CRU and maize nutrient uptake. In order to learn more about the effects of CRU application on maize yields, N uptake, mineral N (N<sub>min</sub>) dynamics, N balance in soil-crop systems, and economic returns, a series of field experiments were carried out in 2018–2020 in Dalian City, Liaoning Province, China. There were 4 different treatments in the experiments: no N fertilizer input (control, CK); application of common urea at 210 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> (U), the ideal fertilization management level for the study site; application of polyurethane-coated urea at the same N input rate as U (PCU); and application of PCU at a 20% reduction in N input rate (0.8PCU). Our findings showed that using CRU (<em>i.e</em>., PCU and 0.8PCU) may considerably increase maize N absorption, maintain maize yields, and increase N use efficiency (NUE) compared to U. The grain yield showed considerable positive correlations with total N uptake in leaf in U and 0.8PCU, but negative correlations with that in PCU, indicating that PCU caused excessive maize absorption while 0.8PCU could achieve a better yield response to N supply. Besides, PCU was able to maintain N fertilizer in the soil profile 0–20 cm away from the fertilization point, and higher N<sub>min</sub> content was observed in the 0–20 cm soil layer at various growth stages, particularly at the middle and late growing stages, optimizing the temporal and spatial distributions of N<sub>min</sub>. Additionally, compared to that in U, the apparent N loss rate in PCU was reduced by 36.2%, and applying CRU (PCU and 0.8PCU) increased net profit by 8.5% to 15.2% with less labor and fertilization frequency. It was concluded that using CRU could be an effective N fertilizer management strategy to sustain maize production, improve NUE, and increase economic returns while minimizing environmental risks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49709,"journal":{"name":"Pedosphere","volume":"34 1","pages":"Pages 222-235"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1002016023000991/pdfft?md5=ca1bbf8c751a21843bab499e4aa2581a&pid=1-s2.0-S1002016023000991-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedosphere","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1002016023000991","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The creation of controlled-release urea (CRU) is a potent substitute for conventional fertilizers in order to preserve the availability of nitrogen (N) in soil, prevent environmental pollution, and move toward green agriculture. The main objectives of this study were to assess the impacts of CRU's full application on maize production and to clarify the connection between the nutrient release pattern of CRU and maize nutrient uptake. In order to learn more about the effects of CRU application on maize yields, N uptake, mineral N (Nmin) dynamics, N balance in soil-crop systems, and economic returns, a series of field experiments were carried out in 2018–2020 in Dalian City, Liaoning Province, China. There were 4 different treatments in the experiments: no N fertilizer input (control, CK); application of common urea at 210 kg ha-1 (U), the ideal fertilization management level for the study site; application of polyurethane-coated urea at the same N input rate as U (PCU); and application of PCU at a 20% reduction in N input rate (0.8PCU). Our findings showed that using CRU (i.e., PCU and 0.8PCU) may considerably increase maize N absorption, maintain maize yields, and increase N use efficiency (NUE) compared to U. The grain yield showed considerable positive correlations with total N uptake in leaf in U and 0.8PCU, but negative correlations with that in PCU, indicating that PCU caused excessive maize absorption while 0.8PCU could achieve a better yield response to N supply. Besides, PCU was able to maintain N fertilizer in the soil profile 0–20 cm away from the fertilization point, and higher Nmin content was observed in the 0–20 cm soil layer at various growth stages, particularly at the middle and late growing stages, optimizing the temporal and spatial distributions of Nmin. Additionally, compared to that in U, the apparent N loss rate in PCU was reduced by 36.2%, and applying CRU (PCU and 0.8PCU) increased net profit by 8.5% to 15.2% with less labor and fertilization frequency. It was concluded that using CRU could be an effective N fertilizer management strategy to sustain maize production, improve NUE, and increase economic returns while minimizing environmental risks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
控释尿素通过优化土壤矿质氮时空分布,提高玉米吸氮量、环境效益和经济效益
控释尿素(CRU)是传统肥料的有效替代品,可有效保护土壤中的氮(N),防止环境污染,实现绿色农业。本研究的主要目的是评估全面施用控释尿素对玉米产量的影响,并阐明控释尿素养分释放模式与玉米养分吸收之间的联系。为了进一步了解CRU施用对玉米产量、氮吸收、矿质氮(Nmin)动态、土壤-作物系统中的氮平衡以及经济收益的影响,2018-2020年在中国辽宁省大连市开展了一系列田间试验。实验中共有 4 种不同的处理:不施氮肥(对照,CK);施用普通尿素,施用量为 210 kg ha-1(U),这是研究地点的理想施肥管理水平;施用聚氨酯包膜尿素,施用量与 U 相同(PCU);施用 PCU,施用量减少 20%(0.8PCU)。我们的研究结果表明,与尿素相比,使用 CRU(即 PCU 和 0.8PCU)可显著提高玉米对氮的吸收、维持玉米产量并提高氮的利用效率(NUE)。尿素和 0.8PCU 的谷物产量与叶片对氮的总吸收量呈显著正相关,但与 PCU 呈负相关,这表明 PCU 会导致玉米过度吸收氮,而 0.8PCU 则可实现更好的产量对氮供应的响应。此外,PCU 能够将氮肥保持在距施肥点 0-20 cm 的土壤剖面中,在不同生长阶段,尤其是中后期,0-20 cm 土层中的 Nmin 含量较高,优化了 Nmin 的时空分布。此外,与 U 相比,PCU 的表观氮损失率降低了 36.2%,施用 CRU(PCU 和 0.8PCU)在减少劳动力和施肥次数的情况下,净利润增加了 8.5% 至 15.2%。结论是,使用 CRU 是一种有效的氮肥管理策略,可维持玉米生产,提高氮利用效率,增加经济收益,同时将环境风险降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pedosphere
Pedosphere 环境科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
1.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
5.0 months
期刊介绍: PEDOSPHERE—a peer-reviewed international journal published bimonthly in English—welcomes submissions from scientists around the world under a broad scope of topics relevant to timely, high quality original research findings, especially up-to-date achievements and advances in the entire field of soil science studies dealing with environmental science, ecology, agriculture, bioscience, geoscience, forestry, etc. It publishes mainly original research articles as well as some reviews, mini reviews, short communications and special issues.
期刊最新文献
Wheat morphological and biochemical responses to copper oxide nanoparticles in two soils Evaluating the necessity of autumn irrigation on salinized soil by considering changes in soil physicochemical properties Combining conservation tillage with nitrogen fertilization promotes maize straw decomposition by regulating soil microbial community and enzyme activities Global and regional soil organic carbon estimates: Magnitudes and uncertainties Cadmium found in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) kernels mainly originates from root uptake rather than shell absorption from soil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1