Chasing Rights in Delhi: Social Movements and the National Food Security Act

Nandini P. Nayak
{"title":"Chasing Rights in Delhi: Social Movements and the National Food Security Act","authors":"Nandini P. Nayak","doi":"10.4000/SAMAJ.6306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 2000s, “rights-based approaches” to development acquired prominence in national level social policy in India. From 2005 to 2013, the Indian parliament passed several laws that effectively created new legal “rights.” This included a national legislation on the “right to work” under the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) enacted in 2005 and a National Food Security Act (NFSA) on the “right to food” enacted in 2013. In text, rights created under these legislations expanded the idea of citizenship by defining justiciable claims that could be made against the state. The enactment of these legislations drew on a history of collective action and litigation centered on constitutional law and created the possibility of a new, progressive politics. Yet this positive expansion of citizenship rights has in recent years encountered a backlash and a de facto reigning in of rights. Part of this erosion of rights has been due to the Aadhaar based digital technologies using biometrics that were introduced as a key tool of implementation of social protection programs implemented under laws such as the NREGA and NFSA. Despite the present context of Aadhaar based erosion of citizenship rights, and the specter of coded and precarious citizenship, this paper argues that challenges to implementation of social policy need to be viewed in perspective. The role of social movements has been fundamental to the emergence of the aforementioned policies and legislations. Moving forward, the role of civil society actors in demanding probity in implementation of social policy, and in the reclaiming of citizenship, is critical for ensuring that new rights legislations retain their progressive potential.","PeriodicalId":36326,"journal":{"name":"South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/SAMAJ.6306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the 2000s, “rights-based approaches” to development acquired prominence in national level social policy in India. From 2005 to 2013, the Indian parliament passed several laws that effectively created new legal “rights.” This included a national legislation on the “right to work” under the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) enacted in 2005 and a National Food Security Act (NFSA) on the “right to food” enacted in 2013. In text, rights created under these legislations expanded the idea of citizenship by defining justiciable claims that could be made against the state. The enactment of these legislations drew on a history of collective action and litigation centered on constitutional law and created the possibility of a new, progressive politics. Yet this positive expansion of citizenship rights has in recent years encountered a backlash and a de facto reigning in of rights. Part of this erosion of rights has been due to the Aadhaar based digital technologies using biometrics that were introduced as a key tool of implementation of social protection programs implemented under laws such as the NREGA and NFSA. Despite the present context of Aadhaar based erosion of citizenship rights, and the specter of coded and precarious citizenship, this paper argues that challenges to implementation of social policy need to be viewed in perspective. The role of social movements has been fundamental to the emergence of the aforementioned policies and legislations. Moving forward, the role of civil society actors in demanding probity in implementation of social policy, and in the reclaiming of citizenship, is critical for ensuring that new rights legislations retain their progressive potential.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在德里追逐权利:社会运动和国家粮食安全法
在2000年代,“基于权利的发展方法”在印度国家层面的社会政策中占有突出地位。从2005年到2013年,印度议会通过了几项法律,有效地创造了新的法律“权利”。这包括2005年颁布的《全国农村就业保障法》(NREGA)下关于“工作权”的国家立法,以及2013年颁布的《国家粮食安全法》(NFSA)关于“食物权”的国家立法。在文本中,这些立法所创造的权利通过定义可以对国家提出的可诉性要求,扩展了公民身份的概念。这些立法的制定借鉴了以宪法为中心的集体行动和诉讼的历史,并创造了一种新的进步政治的可能性。然而,近年来,公民权利的这种积极扩张遭遇了反弹,并在事实上控制了权利。这种权利受到侵蚀的部分原因是基于Aadhaar的使用生物识别技术的数字技术,这些技术被引入作为实施根据NREGA和NFSA等法律实施的社会保护计划的关键工具。尽管目前的背景是基于Aadhaar的公民权利的侵蚀,以及编码和不稳定的公民身份的幽灵,但本文认为,需要正确看待社会政策实施的挑战。社会运动的作用是上述政策和立法产生的根本原因。今后,民间社会行动者在执行社会政策时要求廉正,以及在恢复公民权方面发挥作用,对于确保新的权利立法保持其进步潜力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal
South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Harihar Bhattacharyya. Federalism in Asia: India, Pakistan, Malaysia, Nepal and Myanmar AAP, Apps and WhatsApp Durba Mitra. Indian Sex Life: Sexuality and the Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought Transcending Binaries through Self-empowerment and Personal Development Digitalization of Solid Waste Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1