The Growing Demand in Europe for Reconstructive Clitoral Surgery after Female Genital Cutting: A Looping Effect of the Dominant Discourse?

Abstract

When activism to combat «female circumcision» gained momentum in the 1980s, a discursive gap was created that persists until today. On the one hand, campaigners, activists, governments and some scholars promoted a discourse that focused on these practices as mutilations; on the other hand, not all scholars were willing to adopt the new term (FGM, «female genital mutilation») or to drop the perspective that these practices must be described within their wider contexts, with the full variations in different settings. Starting from this gap, this article discusses «reconstructive clitoral surgery», or «clitoris repair», as a cultural phenomenon growing out of the first discursive stream. Using Ian Hacking’s concepts «interactive kinds» and «looping effect», I argue that the increasing demand for reconstructive clitoral surgery in European countries needs to be understood in relation to the dominant anti-FGM discourse. While many interdisciplinary teams around Europe strive toward providing a holistic and respectful care for women requesting the surgery, I contend that the ubiquitous anti-FGM discourse has negative effects for both circumcised women who opt for surgery and those who do not.