Reevaluating religious understandings of reconciliation: a study in Bosnia and Herzegovina

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Peacebuilding Pub Date : 2022-02-21 DOI:10.1080/21647259.2022.2040228
Stipe Odak
{"title":"Reevaluating religious understandings of reconciliation: a study in Bosnia and Herzegovina","authors":"Stipe Odak","doi":"10.1080/21647259.2022.2040228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Religious discourse on reconciliation significantly influenced many past and present peacebuilding efforts. However, the concept of reconciliation is also often criticized on two main counts: 1) for promoting unrealistic visions of harmony among former enemies, and 2) for pressuring victims to grant forgiveness and leave the past behind. In this paper, I suggest a re-evaluation of these claims in light of theoretical sources and interviews with religious leaders from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Theological understandings of reconciliation are inherently pluralistic. Religious leaders are inspired by prospects of reconciled humanity at the end of time, but they are also wary of too hasty reconciliation-projects, especially when reconciliation might harm other values, such as truth and justice. Proper understanding of religious traditions is thus essential for honest and realistic collaboration on peacebuilding projects between secular and religious actors.","PeriodicalId":45555,"journal":{"name":"Peacebuilding","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peacebuilding","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2022.2040228","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Religious discourse on reconciliation significantly influenced many past and present peacebuilding efforts. However, the concept of reconciliation is also often criticized on two main counts: 1) for promoting unrealistic visions of harmony among former enemies, and 2) for pressuring victims to grant forgiveness and leave the past behind. In this paper, I suggest a re-evaluation of these claims in light of theoretical sources and interviews with religious leaders from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Theological understandings of reconciliation are inherently pluralistic. Religious leaders are inspired by prospects of reconciled humanity at the end of time, but they are also wary of too hasty reconciliation-projects, especially when reconciliation might harm other values, such as truth and justice. Proper understanding of religious traditions is thus essential for honest and realistic collaboration on peacebuilding projects between secular and religious actors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新评估宗教对和解的理解:波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那研究
关于和解的宗教言论对过去和现在的许多建设和平努力产生了重大影响。然而,和解的概念也经常受到两个主要方面的批评:1)在以前的敌人之间宣扬不切实际的和谐愿景,2)向受害者施压,要求他们宽恕并抛弃过去。在本文中,我建议根据理论来源和对波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那宗教领袖的采访,重新评估这些说法。对和解的神学理解本质上是多元的。宗教领袖受到人类最终和解前景的鼓舞,但他们也对过于草率的和解项目持谨慎态度,尤其是当和解可能损害其他价值观,如真相和正义时。因此,正确理解宗教传统对于世俗和宗教行为者在建设和平项目上进行诚实和现实的合作至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Peacebuilding
Peacebuilding Multiple-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Rethinking peace and violence from the favelas Peacebuilding, peacekeeping, and the ‘balance of bureaucratic power’ in Kofi Annan’s Secretariat: a micro-history of two United Nations departments Methodology of the excluded: conspiracy as discourse in the eastern DRC Dialogue for peace: the production of knowledge and norms between international practices and local ownership in Ukraine The fragmentation of the security-development nexus: the UK government’s approach to security and development 2015-2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1