UKOSS update

IF 1.2 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Obstetrician & Gynaecologist Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1111/tog.12821
Marian Knight
{"title":"UKOSS update","authors":"Marian Knight","doi":"10.1111/tog.12821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The proportion of caesarean sections performed in the second stage of labour is rising. Complications of second stage caesarean births are known to be greater for both mother and baby, which may in part be due to deep engagement of the baby’s head in the pelvis, so-called ‘impacted fetal head’. Many different disimpaction techniques have been described. The objective of this study was to use the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS) to determine the incidence of, and complication rates from, impacted fetal head at full dilatation caesarean birth in the UK and record what techniques were used. 3,518 second stage caesarean births were reported from 152 of 194 UK obstetric units (82%) between 1st March and 31st August 2019. The surgeon used a disimpaction technique or reported ‘difficulty’ in 564 (16%) of these. The most common disimpaction techniques used were manual elevation of the head by an assistant through the vagina (n = 235) and a fetal ‘pillow’ (n = 176). Fifteen babies (3%) died or sustained severe injury. Four babies died (two directly attributable to the impacted fetal head). Thirty-four women (6%) required level 2 or level 3 critical care. This study shows that impacted fetal head is common and can result in significant maternal and neonatal complications. Although difficulty with delivery of the fetal head and the use of disimpaction techniques during second stage caesarean sections are common there is no consensus as to the best method to achieve delivery and in what order.","PeriodicalId":51862,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrician & Gynaecologist","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrician & Gynaecologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tog.12821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The proportion of caesarean sections performed in the second stage of labour is rising. Complications of second stage caesarean births are known to be greater for both mother and baby, which may in part be due to deep engagement of the baby’s head in the pelvis, so-called ‘impacted fetal head’. Many different disimpaction techniques have been described. The objective of this study was to use the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS) to determine the incidence of, and complication rates from, impacted fetal head at full dilatation caesarean birth in the UK and record what techniques were used. 3,518 second stage caesarean births were reported from 152 of 194 UK obstetric units (82%) between 1st March and 31st August 2019. The surgeon used a disimpaction technique or reported ‘difficulty’ in 564 (16%) of these. The most common disimpaction techniques used were manual elevation of the head by an assistant through the vagina (n = 235) and a fetal ‘pillow’ (n = 176). Fifteen babies (3%) died or sustained severe injury. Four babies died (two directly attributable to the impacted fetal head). Thirty-four women (6%) required level 2 or level 3 critical care. This study shows that impacted fetal head is common and can result in significant maternal and neonatal complications. Although difficulty with delivery of the fetal head and the use of disimpaction techniques during second stage caesarean sections are common there is no consensus as to the best method to achieve delivery and in what order.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
UKOSS更新
在分娩的第二阶段进行剖腹产的比例正在上升。众所周知,第二阶段剖腹产的并发症对母亲和婴儿来说都更严重,这在一定程度上可能是由于婴儿的头部与骨盆深度接合,即所谓的“受影响胎儿头部”。已经描述了许多不同的脱嵌技术。本研究的目的是使用英国产科监测系统(UKOSS)来确定英国全扩张剖腹产时胎儿头部受影响的发生率和并发症发生率,并记录所使用的技术。2019年3月1日至8月31日期间,英国194个产科病房中的152个(82%)报告了3518例第二阶段剖腹产。在564例(16%)患者中,外科医生使用了嵌塞术或报告了“困难”。最常见的嵌塞技术是由助手通过阴道手动抬高头部(n=235)和胎儿“枕头”(n=176)。15名婴儿(3%)死亡或受重伤。四名婴儿死亡(其中两名直接归因于胎儿头部受到撞击)。34名妇女(6%)需要2级或3级重症监护。这项研究表明,受影响的胎儿头部是常见的,并可能导致重大的孕产妇和新生儿并发症。尽管在第二阶段剖腹产中,胎儿头部分娩和使用嵌塞技术的困难很常见,但对于实现分娩的最佳方法和顺序,还没有达成共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetrician & Gynaecologist
Obstetrician & Gynaecologist OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
自引率
7.10%
发文量
66
期刊最新文献
A focus on progestogens in hormone replacement therapy Re: Advanced abdominal pregnancy: challenges, update and review current management What's new in guidance: Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (FSRH) update What I've learnt… with Prof James Drife CPD questions for volume 25 issue 4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1