Corn yield as affected by row pattern, plant density, and irrigation system

IF 1 Q3 AGRONOMY Journal of Crop Improvement Pub Date : 2021-10-12 DOI:10.1080/15427528.2021.1980754
R. Sorensen, M. Lamb, C. Butts
{"title":"Corn yield as affected by row pattern, plant density, and irrigation system","authors":"R. Sorensen, M. Lamb, C. Butts","doi":"10.1080/15427528.2021.1980754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Row crops normally grown in Southeast USA are cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), corn (Zea mays L.), and peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) with a focus on the higher economic value for peanut. Peanut is typically planted using a twin-row pattern and purchasing a twin-row planter may not be cost effective unless used with other rotational crops. The objectives were to compare corn yield when planted in twin-rows, with two plant densities, at multiple locations, and irrigated with drip or sprinkler system. Corn was planted in single and twin-row patterns at 7.9 seeds/m (normal; 86,100 seeds/ha) and 4.9 seeds/m (half-normal; 53,600 seeds/ha) at multiple locations and cropping seasons. Irrigation systems consisted of subsurface drip (SSDI), shallow subsurface drip (S3DI) and overhead sprinkler. Single and twin-row with normal seeding rate had same yield across years, locations, or irrigation system 88% of the time. With drip irrigation only, twin-row half-normal seeding rate had the same yield as the single-row normal seeding rate 75% of the time and when factoring in seed savings had an economic benefit of $56/ha. The single-row half-normal seeding rate always had lower yield compared with other treatments. The S3DI irrigation system had greater yield than SSDI for both row patterns and seeding rates. Therefore, a twin-row planter purchased for peanut may be used to plant corn without yield reduction using normal seeding rates under either drip or sprinkler irrigation systems.","PeriodicalId":15468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crop Improvement","volume":"36 1","pages":"526 - 538"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crop Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2021.1980754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Row crops normally grown in Southeast USA are cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), corn (Zea mays L.), and peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) with a focus on the higher economic value for peanut. Peanut is typically planted using a twin-row pattern and purchasing a twin-row planter may not be cost effective unless used with other rotational crops. The objectives were to compare corn yield when planted in twin-rows, with two plant densities, at multiple locations, and irrigated with drip or sprinkler system. Corn was planted in single and twin-row patterns at 7.9 seeds/m (normal; 86,100 seeds/ha) and 4.9 seeds/m (half-normal; 53,600 seeds/ha) at multiple locations and cropping seasons. Irrigation systems consisted of subsurface drip (SSDI), shallow subsurface drip (S3DI) and overhead sprinkler. Single and twin-row with normal seeding rate had same yield across years, locations, or irrigation system 88% of the time. With drip irrigation only, twin-row half-normal seeding rate had the same yield as the single-row normal seeding rate 75% of the time and when factoring in seed savings had an economic benefit of $56/ha. The single-row half-normal seeding rate always had lower yield compared with other treatments. The S3DI irrigation system had greater yield than SSDI for both row patterns and seeding rates. Therefore, a twin-row planter purchased for peanut may be used to plant corn without yield reduction using normal seeding rates under either drip or sprinkler irrigation systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玉米产量受行距、种植密度和灌溉系统的影响
摘要美国东南部通常种植的行作物有棉花(Gossypium hirsutum L.)、玉米(Zea mays L.)和花生(Arachis hypogea L.),重点是花生具有较高的经济价值。花生通常采用双排模式种植,除非与其他轮作作物一起使用,否则购买双排播种机可能不划算。目的是比较玉米在多个位置种植成两排、两种植物密度以及用滴灌或洒水系统灌溉时的产量。玉米在多个地点和种植季节以7.9种子/m(正常;86100种子/公顷)和4.9种子/m(半正常;53600种子/ha)的单行和双列模式种植。灌溉系统由地下滴灌(SSDI)、浅地下滴灌(S3DI)和高架洒水喷头组成。正常播种率的单列和双列在88%的时间内,在年份、地点或灌溉系统中具有相同的产量。在仅采用滴灌的情况下,双列半正常播种率在75%的时间内与单列正常播种率具有相同的产量,并且考虑到种子节约,经济效益为56美元/公顷。与其他处理相比,单行半正常播种率的产量总是较低。S3DI灌溉系统在行型和播种率方面都比SSDI灌溉系统产量高。因此,为花生购买的双列播种机可以在滴灌或喷灌系统下使用正常播种率种植玉米,而不会减产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology (JCSB) is a peer-reviewed international journal published four times a year. JCSB publishes novel and advanced original research articles on topics related to the production science of field crops and resource plants, including cropping systems, sustainable agriculture, environmental change, post-harvest management, biodiversity, crop improvement, and recent advances in physiology and molecular biology. Also covered are related subjects in a wide range of sciences such as the ecological and physiological aspects of crop production and genetic, breeding, and biotechnological approaches for crop improvement.
期刊最新文献
Potato disease prediction using machine learning, image processing and IoT – a systematic literature survey Determining morphological and biochemical indices to select for smut-resistant sugarcane varieties Characterization and morphological diversity of sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum ) genotypes based on descriptor traits Time to treat the climate and nature crisis as one indivisible global health emergency Successful fertility restoration in male-sterile barnase line by optimal expression of barstar gene for hybrid-rice seed production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1