Beyond ‘what works’: implementing sex offender treatment programs in the ‘real world’

IF 1.1 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Journal of Offender Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2022-03-16 DOI:10.1080/10509674.2022.2045529
Susan Rayment-McHugh, E. Belton, Nadine McKillop, Larissa S. Christensen, T. Prenzler, L. Hine
{"title":"Beyond ‘what works’: implementing sex offender treatment programs in the ‘real world’","authors":"Susan Rayment-McHugh, E. Belton, Nadine McKillop, Larissa S. Christensen, T. Prenzler, L. Hine","doi":"10.1080/10509674.2022.2045529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Extending the ‘what works’ tradition in correctional research, realist evaluation approaches champion the need to understand the nuances of program implementation and effectiveness, asking “what works, for whom, in what circumstances, in what respects, and how?”. This highlights the importance of understanding how programs work in ‘real world’ settings, and not simply whether or not they produce a positive outcome overall. Informed by this approach, the current study employed focus groups and interviews with corrective services programs staff in Australia, to explore factors that impact program success and key program implementation considerations. Findings reveal system-, program-, and individual- level factors that appear to impact program success, largely by constraining program delivery. Identified implementation considerations included program design and delivery, and staffing and resources. By examining the nuances of program delivery, this study provides a better understanding of the ‘real-world’ operation of custodial sex offender treatment programs, and adds important context to reported outcome studies.","PeriodicalId":46878,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Offender Rehabilitation","volume":"61 1","pages":"148 - 167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Offender Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2022.2045529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Extending the ‘what works’ tradition in correctional research, realist evaluation approaches champion the need to understand the nuances of program implementation and effectiveness, asking “what works, for whom, in what circumstances, in what respects, and how?”. This highlights the importance of understanding how programs work in ‘real world’ settings, and not simply whether or not they produce a positive outcome overall. Informed by this approach, the current study employed focus groups and interviews with corrective services programs staff in Australia, to explore factors that impact program success and key program implementation considerations. Findings reveal system-, program-, and individual- level factors that appear to impact program success, largely by constraining program delivery. Identified implementation considerations included program design and delivery, and staffing and resources. By examining the nuances of program delivery, this study provides a better understanding of the ‘real-world’ operation of custodial sex offender treatment programs, and adds important context to reported outcome studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越“有效”:在“现实世界”中实施性犯罪者治疗计划
现实主义评估方法延续了惩教研究中“什么有效”的传统,强调需要理解项目实施和有效性的细微差别,提出“什么有效,对谁有效,在什么情况下有效,在什么方面有效,以及如何有效?”这凸显了理解项目在“现实世界”环境中如何运作的重要性,而不仅仅是它们是否产生了总体上积极的结果。根据这种方法,目前的研究采用了焦点小组和对澳大利亚矫正服务项目工作人员的访谈,以探索影响项目成功的因素和项目实施的关键考虑因素。研究结果揭示了系统、项目和个人层面的因素似乎影响了项目的成功,主要是通过限制项目的交付。确定的实施考虑包括程序设计和交付,以及人员配备和资源。通过检查项目实施的细微差别,本研究提供了对“现实世界”性犯罪者监禁治疗项目运作的更好理解,并为报告的结果研究增加了重要的背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Journal of Offender Rehabilitation is a multidisciplinary journal of innovation in research, services and programs in criminal justice and corrections. The journal is an essential professional resource for practitioners, educators and researchers who work with individuals involved in the criminal justice system and study the dynamics of rehabilitation and individual and system change. Original research using qualitative or quantitative methodology, theoretical discussions, evaluations of program outcomes, and state of the science reviews will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Working in partnership to reduce re-offending and improve prison leavers' lives: a process evaluation of a prison leaver pilot project. The effect of drug treatment court on recidivism: a comparison with traditional court intervention Forgiveness and rehabilitation of Portuguese incarcerated individuals: what do they think about forgiveness? Paradoxes of experiencing time and functioning in Prison – longitudinal studies and their implications for psychological interventions Religiosity, family integration and social capital as predictors of post-incarceration reintegration of ex- prisoners in Punjab, Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1