The prehistoric entrepreneur: rethinking the definition

IF 0.9 Q4 MANAGEMENT Journal of Management History Pub Date : 2022-06-21 DOI:10.1108/jmh-11-2021-0058
D. Lidow
{"title":"The prehistoric entrepreneur: rethinking the definition","authors":"D. Lidow","doi":"10.1108/jmh-11-2021-0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to derive a time and place invariant definition of entrepreneurship necessary for the identification of prehistoric entrepreneurial behavior.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe definition was derived by correlating a diverse set of archeological artifacts that could correspond to entrepreneurial activity with established anthropological and historical evidence of ancient entrepreneurial activity. The definition was formulated as a compact operational definition to ensure it could produce yes or no answers to whether specific archeological, anthropological or historical records could be associated with entrepreneurial activity.\n\n\nFindings\nThis effort produced a unique time and place independent definition of entrepreneur that enables the identification of prehistoric entrepreneurial activity and heretofore unrealized structure of entrepreneurial activity. Specifically, entrepreneurship as defined herein predates social hierarchy, political economy, markets and pricing mechanisms. Modern definitions often inconsistently limit the scope of entrepreneurial behavior.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis analysis was performed based upon specific, not exhaustive, sets of archeological, anthropological and historical records. Unexamined records or new discoveries could yield examples of entrepreneurial activity that transcend this definition.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis definition challenges how we think about, measure and model entrepreneurial impact today and opens new avenues of inquiry to understanding the social and economic impacts of entrepreneurial behavior.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nA time and place invariant operational definition of entrepreneurship that could precisely identify entrepreneurial activity in the archeological record has not existed before. The definition enables the author to identify entrepreneurial activity among hunter-gatherers and in other locations not previously identified.\n","PeriodicalId":45819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management History","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmh-11-2021-0058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to derive a time and place invariant definition of entrepreneurship necessary for the identification of prehistoric entrepreneurial behavior. Design/methodology/approach The definition was derived by correlating a diverse set of archeological artifacts that could correspond to entrepreneurial activity with established anthropological and historical evidence of ancient entrepreneurial activity. The definition was formulated as a compact operational definition to ensure it could produce yes or no answers to whether specific archeological, anthropological or historical records could be associated with entrepreneurial activity. Findings This effort produced a unique time and place independent definition of entrepreneur that enables the identification of prehistoric entrepreneurial activity and heretofore unrealized structure of entrepreneurial activity. Specifically, entrepreneurship as defined herein predates social hierarchy, political economy, markets and pricing mechanisms. Modern definitions often inconsistently limit the scope of entrepreneurial behavior. Research limitations/implications This analysis was performed based upon specific, not exhaustive, sets of archeological, anthropological and historical records. Unexamined records or new discoveries could yield examples of entrepreneurial activity that transcend this definition. Practical implications This definition challenges how we think about, measure and model entrepreneurial impact today and opens new avenues of inquiry to understanding the social and economic impacts of entrepreneurial behavior. Originality/value A time and place invariant operational definition of entrepreneurship that could precisely identify entrepreneurial activity in the archeological record has not existed before. The definition enables the author to identify entrepreneurial activity among hunter-gatherers and in other locations not previously identified.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
史前企业家:重新思考企业家的定义
目的本文旨在推导一个时间和地点不变的创业定义,这是识别史前创业行为所必需的。设计/方法论/方法该定义是通过将一组不同的考古文物与古代创业活动的人类学和历史证据相关联而得出的,这些文物可能与创业活动相对应。该定义被制定为一个紧凑的操作定义,以确保它能够对特定的考古、人类学或历史记录是否与创业活动有关做出肯定或否定的回答。发现这一努力产生了一个独特的时间和地点独立的企业家定义,使人们能够识别史前创业活动和迄今为止未实现的创业活动结构。具体而言,本文定义的创业早于社会等级制度、政治经济、市场和定价机制。现代定义往往不一致地限制了创业行为的范围。研究局限性/含义该分析基于具体而非详尽的考古、人类学和历史记录。未经审查的记录或新发现可能会产生超越这一定义的创业活动的例子。实际含义这一定义挑战了我们今天对创业影响的思考、衡量和建模方式,并为理解创业行为的社会和经济影响开辟了新的研究途径。独创性/价值一种时间和地点不变的创业操作定义,可以准确地识别考古记录中的创业活动,这在以前是不存在的。该定义使作者能够识别狩猎采集者和其他先前未识别的地点的创业活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the intellectual nexus between Peirce’s synechism and Goldratt’s theory of constraints: insights for management and organization studies Back to roots! The singular introduction of statutory auditing in France, Germany and Great Britain (1844–1935) Rooting firm responsibility in social-ecological systems through ancient Nahua thought: rethinking the logic model in the global reporting initiative The troubled establishment of the Tourist Hotel Corporation of New Zealand Boundary spanning activities and resource orchestration as microfoundations of dynamic capability: a systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1