How legitimate are the environmental sustainability claims of luxury conglomerates?

IF 3.2 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management Pub Date : 2021-02-23 DOI:10.1108/JFMM-09-2020-0214
Victoria K. Wells, Navdeep Athwal, Esterina Nervino, M. Carrigan
{"title":"How legitimate are the environmental sustainability claims of luxury conglomerates?","authors":"Victoria K. Wells, Navdeep Athwal, Esterina Nervino, M. Carrigan","doi":"10.1108/JFMM-09-2020-0214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeBy responding to scholarly calls, this study examines the environmental reports of LVMH and Kering. The study extends legitimacy theory to ascertain the credibility of the aforementioned luxury conglomerates' commitment to environmental sustainability.Design/methodology/approachA corpus-assisted discourse analysis centred upon the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines is used to examine the environmental disclosures of LVMH and Kering.FindingsThe findings show inconsistencies due to the lack of brand-level reporting and reporting quality falls short of comparable sustainability reporting within each conglomerate and with one another. Selective and unbalanced reporting along with symbolic management undermines the legitimacy of sustainability efforts by LVMH and Kering.Originality/valueDespite the increased attention paid to sustainable luxury, few studies critically analyse how luxury brands formally report on sustainability.","PeriodicalId":47726,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-09-2020-0214","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

PurposeBy responding to scholarly calls, this study examines the environmental reports of LVMH and Kering. The study extends legitimacy theory to ascertain the credibility of the aforementioned luxury conglomerates' commitment to environmental sustainability.Design/methodology/approachA corpus-assisted discourse analysis centred upon the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines is used to examine the environmental disclosures of LVMH and Kering.FindingsThe findings show inconsistencies due to the lack of brand-level reporting and reporting quality falls short of comparable sustainability reporting within each conglomerate and with one another. Selective and unbalanced reporting along with symbolic management undermines the legitimacy of sustainability efforts by LVMH and Kering.Originality/valueDespite the increased attention paid to sustainable luxury, few studies critically analyse how luxury brands formally report on sustainability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奢侈企业集团的环境可持续性主张有多合法?
通过回应学术呼吁,本研究考察了LVMH和开云集团的环境报告。该研究扩展了合法性理论,以确定上述奢侈品集团对环境可持续性承诺的可信度。设计/方法/方法以全球报告倡议组织(GRI)指南为中心的语料库辅助话语分析用于检查LVMH和开云的环境披露。研究结果发现,由于缺乏品牌层面的报告,报告质量在每个集团内部和彼此之间缺乏可比较的可持续发展报告,因此存在不一致性。选择性和不平衡的报告,加上象征性的管理,削弱了路威酩轩和开云集团可持续发展努力的合法性。独创性/价值尽管人们越来越关注可持续奢侈品,但很少有研究批判性地分析奢侈品牌如何正式报告可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
8.60%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: ■Apparel innovation ■Brand loyalty ■Consumer decisions and shopping behaviour ■Manufacturing systems ■Market positioning ■Merchandising ■Perceptions in the marketplace ■Piracy issues ■Pricing structures ■Product image ■Quality and performance measurement ■The importance of socio-economic factors In the ever-changing world of the fashion industry, it is imperative that senior managers and academics in the field are kept abreast of the latest trends and developments. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management ensures that readers heighten their understanding of issues affecting their industry through the latest thinking and current best practice.
期刊最新文献
When and how it is good for fashion to look typical: visual prototypicality affecting product valuation and brand preference Café or art exhibition? Which experience is more effective in luxury fashion flagships? Retail therapy? The role of positive body image in women’s clothing experiences and preferences for in-store shopping environments Scaling circular business models: strategic paths of second-hand fashion retail Fast fashion consumption as a female competition strategy: implications for sustainable consumption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1