"I knew it was a problem before, but did I really?": Engaging teachers in data use for equity.

IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Educational Change Pub Date : 2023-01-18 DOI:10.1007/s10833-022-09477-z
Stephanie L Dodman, Elizabeth K DeMulder, Jenice L View, Stacia M Stribling, Rebecca Brusseau
{"title":"\"I knew it was a problem before, but did I really?\": Engaging teachers in data use for equity.","authors":"Stephanie L Dodman, Elizabeth K DeMulder, Jenice L View, Stacia M Stribling, Rebecca Brusseau","doi":"10.1007/s10833-022-09477-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In current contexts of education, educators are tasked with using data, most often without any critical preparation to do so. In this way, data are presented as objective measures of student progress and participation in school without consideration of the systemic and structural influences on that progress and participation. This article reports on a proposed framework for preparing educators to engage in critical data-driven decision making as an engine of disrupting classroom and school-based systemic inequity through data use. We argue that if educators are to use data in ways that acknowledge the inequities of schooling and act in ways to trigger change, we must prepare them to engage with data differently. The framework we describe, <i>data use for equity</i>, integrates data and equity literacies in this service. We use case study to report on the outcomes of a professional development project guided by this conceptual framework of data use for equity. Participants engaged in professional development that utilized a School and Classroom Equity Audit as a triggering data event and explicitly attended to the relationship of culture and education. Findings demonstrated that professional development in data use for equity enhanced participants' sense of agency, perceptions of equity and data, and perceived multicultural capacities. Findings also demonstrated that while participants made progress in strengthening their data and equity literacies on almost all indicators through the yearlong professional development, developing data use for equity must be an ongoing effort.</p>","PeriodicalId":47376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Change","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9845823/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Change","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-022-09477-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In current contexts of education, educators are tasked with using data, most often without any critical preparation to do so. In this way, data are presented as objective measures of student progress and participation in school without consideration of the systemic and structural influences on that progress and participation. This article reports on a proposed framework for preparing educators to engage in critical data-driven decision making as an engine of disrupting classroom and school-based systemic inequity through data use. We argue that if educators are to use data in ways that acknowledge the inequities of schooling and act in ways to trigger change, we must prepare them to engage with data differently. The framework we describe, data use for equity, integrates data and equity literacies in this service. We use case study to report on the outcomes of a professional development project guided by this conceptual framework of data use for equity. Participants engaged in professional development that utilized a School and Classroom Equity Audit as a triggering data event and explicitly attended to the relationship of culture and education. Findings demonstrated that professional development in data use for equity enhanced participants' sense of agency, perceptions of equity and data, and perceived multicultural capacities. Findings also demonstrated that while participants made progress in strengthening their data and equity literacies on almost all indicators through the yearlong professional development, developing data use for equity must be an ongoing effort.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我以前就知道这是个问题,但我真的知道吗?:让教师参与数据的公平使用
在当前的教育背景下,教育工作者的任务是使用数据,但往往没有做任何关键的准备工作。在这种情况下,数据被作为衡量学生进步和参与学校活动的客观标准,而没有考虑到影响学生进步和参与的系统性和结构性因素。本文报告了一个建议框架,该框架旨在帮助教育工作者做好准备,参与以数据为导向的关键决策,通过数据的使用来打破课堂和学校的系统性不平等。我们认为,如果教育工作者要以承认学校教育不平等的方式使用数据,并以引发变革的方式采取行动,我们就必须培养他们以不同的方式使用数据。我们所描述的 "公平数据使用 "框架将数据和公平素养整合到这项服务中。我们通过案例研究,报告了在这一公平数据使用概念框架指导下开展的专业发展项目的成果。参与者参与的专业发展利用学校和课堂公平审计作为触发数据事件,并明确关注文化与教育的关系。研究结果表明,公平数据使用方面的专业发展提高了参与者的主体意识、对公平和数据的认识,以及对多元文化能力的认识。研究结果还表明,虽然通过为期一年的专业发展,参与者在几乎所有指标上都在加强其数据和公平素养方面取得了进展,但公平数据使用的发展必须是一项持续的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Educational Change
Journal of Educational Change EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Journal of Educational Change is an international, professionally refereed, state-of-the-art scholarly journal, reflecting the most important ideas and evidence of educational change. The journal brings together some of the most influential thinkers and writers as well as emerging scholars on educational change. It deals with issues like educational innovation, reform and restructuring, school improvement and effectiveness, culture-building, inspection, school-review, and change management. It examines why some people resist change and what their resistance means. It looks at how men and women, older teachers and younger teachers, students, parents and others experience change differently. It looks at the positive aspects of change but does not hesitate to raise uncomfortable questions about many aspects of educational change either. It looks critically and controversially at the social, economic, cultural and political forces that are driving educational change. The Journal of Educational Change welcomes and supports contributions from a range of disciplines, including history, psychology, political science, sociology, anthropology, philosophy and administrative and organizational theory, and from a broad spectrum of methodologies including quantitative and qualitative approaches, documentary study, action research and conceptual development. School leaders, system administrators, teacher leaders, consultants, facilitators, educational researchers, staff developers and change agents of all kinds will find this journal an indispensable resource for guiding them to both classic and cutting-edge understandings of educational change. No other journal provides such comprehensive coverage of the field of educational change.
期刊最新文献
A mixed methods study of education researchers’ knowledge mobilization approaches “Embracing the essence of student voice…then doing something with the data”: One district’s critical use of evidence External facilitators’ practical work for school improvement: de-professionalising or developing improvement capacity? How teachers’ student voice practices affect student engagement and achievement: exploring choice, receptivity, and responsiveness to student voice as moderators Challenges in sustaining professional learning communities focused on equity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1