Preventive Effects of an EPA Preparation on Restenosis after Carotid Artery Stenting

JNET Pub Date : 2018-07-12 DOI:10.5797/JNET.OA.2018-0032
T. Ohashi, Y. Arai, Daichi Kato, S. Aoyagi, Hirofumi Okada, Tomoya Yokoyama, Megumi Ichikawa, Kenta Nagai, H. Namatame, A. Saida, T. Hashimoto, M. Kono
{"title":"Preventive Effects of an EPA Preparation on Restenosis after Carotid Artery Stenting","authors":"T. Ohashi, Y. Arai, Daichi Kato, S. Aoyagi, Hirofumi Okada, Tomoya Yokoyama, Megumi Ichikawa, Kenta Nagai, H. Namatame, A. Saida, T. Hashimoto, M. Kono","doi":"10.5797/JNET.OA.2018-0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the preventive effects of an eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) medication on restenosis after carotid artery stenting (CAS). Methods: Of 134 patients (144 episodes) who underwent CAS in our hospital or affiliated institutions between November 2005 and September 2017, the subjects were 123 who could be followed-up for ≥30 days after procedure by carotid ultrasonography with a mean age of 73.3 years (range: 55–90 years). Males accounted for 106 (86.2%) of the patients, 61 lesions (49.6%) were symptomatic. We retrospectively compared the incidence of restenosis between the two groups: EPA-treated group (n = 43) and non-EPA-treated group (n = 80). In addition, the serum levels of fatty acid compositions had been analyzed in 97 of the 123 patients, and the relationship of the EPA/arachidonic acid (AA) ratio with perioperative ischemic complications or restenosis was examined. Results: There was no restenosis in any of the 43 EPA-treated patients, whereas it occurred in 8 (10%) of the 80 patients in the non-EPA-treated group, and the incidence of restenosis in EPA-treated group was significantly lower (p = 0.043) than that of non-EPA-treated group. In addition, the incidences of restenosis and perioperative ischemic complications were slightly higher in patients with a low EPA/AA ratio. Conclusion: Although restenosis was more frequent in patients with a low EPA/AA ratio, the administration of an EPA medication may prevent restenosis in all patients who underwent CAS.","PeriodicalId":34768,"journal":{"name":"JNET","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNET","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5797/JNET.OA.2018-0032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the preventive effects of an eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) medication on restenosis after carotid artery stenting (CAS). Methods: Of 134 patients (144 episodes) who underwent CAS in our hospital or affiliated institutions between November 2005 and September 2017, the subjects were 123 who could be followed-up for ≥30 days after procedure by carotid ultrasonography with a mean age of 73.3 years (range: 55–90 years). Males accounted for 106 (86.2%) of the patients, 61 lesions (49.6%) were symptomatic. We retrospectively compared the incidence of restenosis between the two groups: EPA-treated group (n = 43) and non-EPA-treated group (n = 80). In addition, the serum levels of fatty acid compositions had been analyzed in 97 of the 123 patients, and the relationship of the EPA/arachidonic acid (AA) ratio with perioperative ischemic complications or restenosis was examined. Results: There was no restenosis in any of the 43 EPA-treated patients, whereas it occurred in 8 (10%) of the 80 patients in the non-EPA-treated group, and the incidence of restenosis in EPA-treated group was significantly lower (p = 0.043) than that of non-EPA-treated group. In addition, the incidences of restenosis and perioperative ischemic complications were slightly higher in patients with a low EPA/AA ratio. Conclusion: Although restenosis was more frequent in patients with a low EPA/AA ratio, the administration of an EPA medication may prevent restenosis in all patients who underwent CAS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EPA制剂对颈动脉支架置入后再狭窄的预防作用
目的:探讨二十碳五烯酸(EPA)药物对颈动脉支架植入术后再狭窄的预防作用。方法:2005年11月至2017年9月在我院或附属机构行CAS的134例(144次)患者中,123例患者术后颈动脉超声随访≥30天,平均年龄73.3岁(55-90岁)。男性106例(86.2%),有症状病变61例(49.6%)。我们回顾性比较两组再狭窄的发生率:epa治疗组(n = 43)和非epa治疗组(n = 80)。此外,分析了123例患者中97例的血清脂肪酸组成水平,并探讨了EPA/花生四烯酸(AA)比值与围手术期缺血性并发症或再狭窄的关系。结果:43例经epa治疗的患者无一例再狭窄发生,而80例未经epa治疗的患者中有8例(10%)再狭窄发生,且经epa治疗的患者再狭窄发生率显著低于未经epa治疗的患者(p = 0.043)。此外,EPA/AA比值较低的患者再狭窄和围手术期缺血性并发症的发生率略高。结论:虽然再狭窄在低EPA/AA比的患者中更为常见,但给予EPA药物可以预防所有接受CAS的患者再狭窄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: JNET Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy is the official journal of the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy (JSNET). The JNET publishes peer-reviewed original research related to neuroendovascular therapy, including clinical studies, state-of-the-art technology, education, and basic sciences.
期刊最新文献
Basilar Artery Occlusion Caused by Extracranial Vertebral Artery Dissection on Its Entry into the Transverse Foramen of the C6 Vertebra: Case Report. Mechanical Thrombectomy and Parent Artery Occlusion for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Due to Vertebral Fracture and Artery Dissection: A Case Report. Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization of Ruptured Aneurysms in the Acute Stage: Advantages and Disadvantages. Treatment Outcomes of 94 Cases of Pipeline Embolization Device in a Single Center: Predictive Factors of Incomplete Aneurysm Occlusion. Endovascular Treatment of Anterior Cranial Fossa Dural Arteriovenous Fistula
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1