Community School Model: Is It an Alternative for School Closures in Rural Territories?

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY Eastern European Countryside Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.12775/eec.2019.007
Inese Šūpule
{"title":"Community School Model: Is It an Alternative for School Closures in Rural Territories?","authors":"Inese Šūpule","doi":"10.12775/eec.2019.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the light of rural depopulation and a decreasing number of schoolchildren, municipalities with rural territories face a question regarding whether to close small rural schools or seek alternatives for school operation. The analysis of a quantitative survey of rural municipalities and rural schools is focused on these main questions: what are the extended functions of rural schools with pupils less than 100, and whether the community school model in rural municipalities may be considered as an alternative to school closures in the context of depopulation of rural territories. The results of quantitative surveys are supplemented and explained by the data of 58 in-depth interviews with different stakeholders, living or working in rural areas. The main findings show that rural schools and municipalities positively evaluate the approach of community schools with extended functions, and partly it is an adaptation strategy for the diminishing number of pupils. However, extended functions and the community school model do not serve as an important argument for keeping a school open, but as a means for attracting pupils from neighbouring municipalities, and is a form of competition between municipalities. The article is prepared with funding from the EEA/Norwegian Financial Mechanism 2009–2014 under Project Contract n° NFI/R/2014/014.","PeriodicalId":42882,"journal":{"name":"Eastern European Countryside","volume":"25 1","pages":"171 - 194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eastern European Countryside","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/eec.2019.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract In the light of rural depopulation and a decreasing number of schoolchildren, municipalities with rural territories face a question regarding whether to close small rural schools or seek alternatives for school operation. The analysis of a quantitative survey of rural municipalities and rural schools is focused on these main questions: what are the extended functions of rural schools with pupils less than 100, and whether the community school model in rural municipalities may be considered as an alternative to school closures in the context of depopulation of rural territories. The results of quantitative surveys are supplemented and explained by the data of 58 in-depth interviews with different stakeholders, living or working in rural areas. The main findings show that rural schools and municipalities positively evaluate the approach of community schools with extended functions, and partly it is an adaptation strategy for the diminishing number of pupils. However, extended functions and the community school model do not serve as an important argument for keeping a school open, but as a means for attracting pupils from neighbouring municipalities, and is a form of competition between municipalities. The article is prepared with funding from the EEA/Norwegian Financial Mechanism 2009–2014 under Project Contract n° NFI/R/2014/014.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区学校模式:它是农村地区关闭学校的替代方案吗?
摘要鉴于农村人口减少和学童人数减少,拥有农村地区的市镇面临着一个问题,即是关闭小型农村学校,还是寻求学校运营的替代方案。对农村市镇和农村学校的定量调查的分析侧重于以下主要问题:学生人数少于100人的农村学校的扩展功能是什么,以及在农村地区人口减少的情况下,农村市镇的社区学校模式是否可以被视为关闭学校的替代方案。对生活或工作在农村地区的不同利益攸关方进行的58次深入访谈的数据补充和解释了定量调查的结果。主要调查结果表明,农村学校和市政当局积极评价具有扩展功能的社区学校的做法,部分原因是这是一种适应学生人数减少的策略。然而,扩展功能和社区学校模式并不是保持学校开放的重要论据,而是吸引邻近城市学生的一种手段,也是城市之间的一种竞争形式。本文由2009–2014年欧洲经济区/挪威金融机制根据NFI/R/2014/014号项目合同提供资金编制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The importance of local community attitudes for sustainable tourism in protected areas: The case of Tikvara Nature Park, Serbia The rural linguistic landscape of Banat Gentrified countryside and non-gentrified countryside: Spatial dimension of the rural gentrification process The impact of the age structure of active population on agricultural activity rate: The case study of the Timok Krajina region Tourism-based development opportunities for rural areas. Example of an underdeveloped region (Siklós district)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1