Revisiting the effects of natural resources on income inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa

Désiré Avom, Nesta Ntsame Ovono, Emmanuel Ongo Nkoa
{"title":"Revisiting the effects of natural resources on income inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa","authors":"Désiré Avom, Nesta Ntsame Ovono, Emmanuel Ongo Nkoa","doi":"10.1108/ijdi-02-2022-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to analyze the effects of natural resource rents on income inequality.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study uses a panel quantile regression (QR) approach for 42 Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries over the period 1998–2018.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results show that natural resource rents have a negative and statistically significant effect on income inequality. Regarding the types of resources, the results show that coal rents increase inequality, while forestry and oil rents reduce income inequality. The results also show that the effects of mining and gas rents vary along the income inequality distribution. Finally, the results reveal a negative and significant effect of natural resource rents on income inequality in all sub-regions except Southern Africa.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe results suggest that the SSA Governments should intensify the implementation of income redistribution policies such as family allowances to poor families with multiple children and public sector job creation. SSA policymakers should also increase access to electricity, and internet, and allocate a portion of oil revenues to create an intergenerational sovereign wealth fund.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nFirst, few studies have analyzed the effects of various types of natural resource rents on income inequality. To this end, this study used the QR method to examine the impact of natural resource rents on inequality, by laying emphasis on various types of natural resources. This study takes into account the likely heterogeneity across countries that may exist when considering a sample such as SSA countries, by examining the effects in the different sub-regions that make up this part of Africa (Central Africa, West Africa, Southern Africa and East Africa).\n","PeriodicalId":37830,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Development Issues","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Development Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijdi-02-2022-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to analyze the effects of natural resource rents on income inequality. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a panel quantile regression (QR) approach for 42 Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries over the period 1998–2018. Findings The results show that natural resource rents have a negative and statistically significant effect on income inequality. Regarding the types of resources, the results show that coal rents increase inequality, while forestry and oil rents reduce income inequality. The results also show that the effects of mining and gas rents vary along the income inequality distribution. Finally, the results reveal a negative and significant effect of natural resource rents on income inequality in all sub-regions except Southern Africa. Practical implications The results suggest that the SSA Governments should intensify the implementation of income redistribution policies such as family allowances to poor families with multiple children and public sector job creation. SSA policymakers should also increase access to electricity, and internet, and allocate a portion of oil revenues to create an intergenerational sovereign wealth fund. Originality/value First, few studies have analyzed the effects of various types of natural resource rents on income inequality. To this end, this study used the QR method to examine the impact of natural resource rents on inequality, by laying emphasis on various types of natural resources. This study takes into account the likely heterogeneity across countries that may exist when considering a sample such as SSA countries, by examining the effects in the different sub-regions that make up this part of Africa (Central Africa, West Africa, Southern Africa and East Africa).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视撒哈拉以南非洲自然资源对收入不平等的影响
目的本研究旨在分析自然资源租金对收入不平等的影响。设计/方法/方法本研究在1998-2018年期间对42个撒哈拉以南非洲国家(SSA)使用了小组分位数回归(QR)方法。研究结果表明,自然资源租金对收入不平等具有显著的负向影响。从资源类型来看,煤炭租金增加了收入不平等,而林业和石油租金减少了收入不平等。结果还表明,采矿和天然气租金的影响沿收入不平等分布而变化。最后,研究结果显示,在除南部非洲以外的所有次区域,自然资源租金对收入不平等都有显著的负影响。实践启示:研究结果表明,SSA政府应加强实施收入再分配政策,如向贫困多子女家庭提供家庭补贴和创造公共部门就业机会。SSA的政策制定者还应该增加电力和互联网的使用,并拨出一部分石油收入,创建一个代际主权财富基金。首先,很少有研究分析不同类型的自然资源租金对收入不平等的影响。为此,本研究采用QR法考察自然资源租金对不平等的影响,重点关注各类自然资源。本研究通过检查构成非洲这一部分的不同分区域(中非、西非、南部非洲和东非)的影响,考虑到在考虑SSA国家等样本时可能存在的国家之间可能存在的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Development Issues
International Journal of Development Issues Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Development Issues (IJDI) publishes scholarly research on important development issues, with a particular focus on development dynamism and a leaning towards inter-disciplinary research. IJDI welcomes papers that are empirically oriented but such work should have solid methodological foundations based on realism and pragmatism rather than on idealism. Critical analysis of development issues from both the heteredox viewpoint and the neo-liberalist viewpoint, in orthodox tradition, are equally encouraged. The journal publishes authoritative, intelligent articles and research of direct relevance to those investigating and/or working within areas closely associated with development processes. Special consideration is given to research papers that consider development issues from either a socio-economic, political, historical or sociological, anthropological, ecological and technological standpoint.
期刊最新文献
Accurate targeting in social assistance programs in Southern Madagascar Impact of government expenditure on unemployment in Asian countries: does institutional quality matter? Estimating vulnerability to income and multidimensional poverty: a new methodological approach Natural resource rent's effect on Ethiopian inequality and manufacturing's moderating role: evidence from dynamic simulated ARDL model Trade, gender equality and institutional quality: Evidence from the gravitational approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1