Phylogenetic relationships and divergence dating of Mantodea using mitochondrial phylogenomics

IF 4.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY Systematic Entomology Pub Date : 2023-05-11 DOI:10.1111/syen.12596
Yue Ma, Le-Ping Zhang, Yi-Jie Lin, Dan-Na Yu, Kenneth B. Storey, Jia-Yong Zhang
{"title":"Phylogenetic relationships and divergence dating of Mantodea using mitochondrial phylogenomics","authors":"Yue Ma,&nbsp;Le-Ping Zhang,&nbsp;Yi-Jie Lin,&nbsp;Dan-Na Yu,&nbsp;Kenneth B. Storey,&nbsp;Jia-Yong Zhang","doi":"10.1111/syen.12596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mantodea is a predatory insect group, its members occupying a diverse array of widely distributed habitats. Praying mantis species utilize hunting strategies including remarkable mimicry and unique camouflage for hiding from natural enemies while catching their prey. The emergence of a “cyclopean ear” in mantises is thought to be a morphological innovation of the group, and an “arms race” with echolocating bats is one of the hypotheses put forward to account for the emergence of the mantis ear from a coevolutionary perspective. However, this hypothesis has not been rigorously tested because of a lack of robust higher-level phylogeny and a detailed chronogram of Mantodea. Previous phylogenetic studies found an incongruence between traditional classification and molecular phylogenetics due to the convergent evolution of various ecomorphic strategies of the lineage. Here, we performed a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of Mantodea based on data from 61 mitogenomes. Our analyses showed that the monophyly of Acanthopidae, Haaniidae, Nanomantidae, Miomantidae and Mantidea was supported. The newly updated Gonypetidae were paraphyletic, whereas Eremiaphilidae, Deroplatyidae and Toxoderidae were polyphyletic. Our molecular dating analyses inferred that Spinomantodea originated at ca. 149 Ma (Late Jurassic), whereas the origin of hearing mantises (Cernomantodea) was inferred as Early Cretaceous (119 Ma, 95% CI: 110–129 Ma). The molecular dating results indicated that the hearing organ in mantises did not arise in response to bat predation. Our study provides a robust framework for further evolutionary comparative studies of mantises.</p>","PeriodicalId":22126,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Entomology","volume":"48 4","pages":"644-657"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/syen.12596","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Mantodea is a predatory insect group, its members occupying a diverse array of widely distributed habitats. Praying mantis species utilize hunting strategies including remarkable mimicry and unique camouflage for hiding from natural enemies while catching their prey. The emergence of a “cyclopean ear” in mantises is thought to be a morphological innovation of the group, and an “arms race” with echolocating bats is one of the hypotheses put forward to account for the emergence of the mantis ear from a coevolutionary perspective. However, this hypothesis has not been rigorously tested because of a lack of robust higher-level phylogeny and a detailed chronogram of Mantodea. Previous phylogenetic studies found an incongruence between traditional classification and molecular phylogenetics due to the convergent evolution of various ecomorphic strategies of the lineage. Here, we performed a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of Mantodea based on data from 61 mitogenomes. Our analyses showed that the monophyly of Acanthopidae, Haaniidae, Nanomantidae, Miomantidae and Mantidea was supported. The newly updated Gonypetidae were paraphyletic, whereas Eremiaphilidae, Deroplatyidae and Toxoderidae were polyphyletic. Our molecular dating analyses inferred that Spinomantodea originated at ca. 149 Ma (Late Jurassic), whereas the origin of hearing mantises (Cernomantodea) was inferred as Early Cretaceous (119 Ma, 95% CI: 110–129 Ma). The molecular dating results indicated that the hearing organ in mantises did not arise in response to bat predation. Our study provides a robust framework for further evolutionary comparative studies of mantises.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用线粒体系统基因组学研究Mantodea的系统发育关系和分化年代
蝠鲼是一种捕食性昆虫,其成员占据着广泛分布的各种栖息地。螳螂利用狩猎策略,包括非凡的模仿和独特的伪装,在捕捉猎物时躲避天敌。螳螂“独耳”的出现被认为是该群体的形态学创新,而与回声定位蝙蝠的“军备竞赛”是从共同进化的角度提出的解释螳螂耳朵出现的假设之一。然而,由于缺乏强有力的更高水平的系统发育学和曼托达目的详细时间图,这一假设尚未得到严格检验。先前的系统发育研究发现,由于谱系的各种生态形态策略的趋同进化,传统分类与分子系统发育学之间存在不一致。在这里,我们根据61个有丝分裂基因组的数据对Mantoda进行了全面的系统发育分析。我们的分析表明,棘蛛科、哈蛛科、纳蛛科、中蛛科和蝠鲼科的单系性得到了支持。新更新的Gonypetidae是副系的,而Eremiaphilidae、Deroplatyidae和Toxoderidae是多系的。我们的分子定年分析推断Spinomatodea起源于约149年 Ma(晚侏罗纪),而听螳螂(Cernomantodea)的起源被推断为早白垩纪(119 马,95%置信区间:110–129 马)。分子测年结果表明,螳螂的听觉器官并不是对蝙蝠捕食的反应。我们的研究为进一步的螳螂进化比较研究提供了一个强有力的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Entomology
Systematic Entomology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Entomology publishes original papers on insect systematics, phylogenetics and integrative taxonomy, with a preference for general interest papers of broad biological, evolutionary or zoogeographical relevance.
期刊最新文献
Resolving the intergeneric phylogeny of the large carrion beetles (Staphylinidae: Silphinae: Silphini) Region‐specific diversification dynamics and biogeographic history of one of the most diverse families of insects Issue Information Phylogeny and historical biogeography of the southern African lacewing genus Afroptera (Neuroptera: Nemopteridae: Nemopterinae) Evolving perspectives in Hymenoptera systematics: Bridging fossils and genomes across time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1