"Burnout syndrome" in anesthesiologists and remedial measures- A narrative review.

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-07 DOI:10.4103/joacp.joacp_322_22
Mridul M Panditrao, Minnu M Panditrao
{"title":"\"Burnout syndrome\" in anesthesiologists and remedial measures- A narrative review.","authors":"Mridul M Panditrao, Minnu M Panditrao","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_322_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anesthesiology, as an occupation, has its own unique sets of challenges, problems, issues, and circumstances, all leading to \"occupational stress,\" which by now should be unequivocally accepted as a well-established fact. It is futile to continue pursuing research questions like, if there \"really\" is stress existing among practicing anesthesiologists/trainees, by conducting questionnaire-based surveys and doing meta-analyses. A significantly high incidence of existence of occupational stress in anesthesiologists is an undisputable and practical reality, which, when longstanding, gets culminated into \"burnout syndrome\" with its disastrous outcomes. Rather than pursuing the often-trodden path of finding the incidence, sources, and other superficial issues, an in-depth study of available literary evidence in relation to burnout has been carried out. Objectifying it as a \"syndrome,\" its etiopathogenesis, pathophysiology inclusive of the prevalent theories of its causality, typology, and progression into various stages of/continuum of the process as an evolving clinical entity have been described. The preventive measures and \"coping strategies\" have been discussed at length in the end. It is the fervent hope and the desire of the authors that this discourse will sensitize all anesthesiologists, especially the younger and upcoming future generation, and help them avoid becoming a prey to this dreadful entity!</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11196043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_322_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anesthesiology, as an occupation, has its own unique sets of challenges, problems, issues, and circumstances, all leading to "occupational stress," which by now should be unequivocally accepted as a well-established fact. It is futile to continue pursuing research questions like, if there "really" is stress existing among practicing anesthesiologists/trainees, by conducting questionnaire-based surveys and doing meta-analyses. A significantly high incidence of existence of occupational stress in anesthesiologists is an undisputable and practical reality, which, when longstanding, gets culminated into "burnout syndrome" with its disastrous outcomes. Rather than pursuing the often-trodden path of finding the incidence, sources, and other superficial issues, an in-depth study of available literary evidence in relation to burnout has been carried out. Objectifying it as a "syndrome," its etiopathogenesis, pathophysiology inclusive of the prevalent theories of its causality, typology, and progression into various stages of/continuum of the process as an evolving clinical entity have been described. The preventive measures and "coping strategies" have been discussed at length in the end. It is the fervent hope and the desire of the authors that this discourse will sensitize all anesthesiologists, especially the younger and upcoming future generation, and help them avoid becoming a prey to this dreadful entity!

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻醉师的“职业倦怠综合征”及其补救措施-述评
麻醉学作为一种职业,有其独特的挑战、问题、问题和环境,所有这些都会导致“职业压力”,到目前为止,这应该是一个明确的公认事实。继续进行问卷调查和荟萃分析等研究问题是徒劳的,例如,执业麻醉师/受训者是否“真的”存在压力。麻醉师职业压力的高发率是一个无可争议的现实,如果长期存在,最终会导致“职业倦怠综合症”,并带来灾难性的后果。与寻找倦怠的发生率、来源和其他表面问题的常见途径不同,本文对现有的与倦怠有关的文献证据进行了深入研究。将其客观化为一种“综合征”,其发病机制,病理生理学包括其因果关系,类型和作为一个不断发展的临床实体的过程的各个阶段/连续体的进展的流行理论已经被描述。最后详细讨论了预防措施和“应对策略”。这是作者的热切希望和愿望,这篇文章将敏感所有麻醉师,特别是年轻的和即将到来的下一代,并帮助他们避免成为这个可怕的实体的猎物!
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the application of double-modified nasopharyngeal airways versus the use of low-flow nasal cannula during pediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A prospective, randomized, noninferiority, controlled trial. Effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia versus desflurane anesthesia on natural killer cell cytotoxicity after hepatocellular carcinoma resection. A double-blinded randomized control trial to compare the duration of analgesia using morphine, clonidine, or dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to ropivacaine in caudal anesthesia in children undergoing infraumbilical surgeries. Target-controlled infusion - Past, present, and future. Assessment of preparedness for emergency cesarean section by utilizing a checklist before and after an educational intervention: A quality improvement study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1