Bowtie Analysis as a prospective risk assessment technique in primary healthcare

R. Mcleod, P. Bowie
{"title":"Bowtie Analysis as a prospective risk assessment technique in primary healthcare","authors":"R. Mcleod, P. Bowie","doi":"10.1080/14773996.2018.1466460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Despite repeated calls for the use of proactive assessment of serious significant events in primary healthcare, GP teams in the UK rarely apply the kind of formal methods of prospective risk assessment that are commonly used in high-hazard industries. NHS Education for Scotland (NES) conducted an exploratory workshop to assess the potential value of Bowtie Analysis (BTA) as a means of proactively identifying and assessing the controls relied on to protect against the risk of a potential primary care ‘never event’. It was concluded that BTA could provide a straightforward approach to engage frontline care practitioners and managers in proactively assessing risk. However, concerns remain about the level of training, support and resources that would be required for the healthcare community to be capable of conducting BTA to an adequate quality standard without having to rely on external facilitators.","PeriodicalId":43946,"journal":{"name":"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14773996.2018.1466460","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2018.1466460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Abstract Despite repeated calls for the use of proactive assessment of serious significant events in primary healthcare, GP teams in the UK rarely apply the kind of formal methods of prospective risk assessment that are commonly used in high-hazard industries. NHS Education for Scotland (NES) conducted an exploratory workshop to assess the potential value of Bowtie Analysis (BTA) as a means of proactively identifying and assessing the controls relied on to protect against the risk of a potential primary care ‘never event’. It was concluded that BTA could provide a straightforward approach to engage frontline care practitioners and managers in proactively assessing risk. However, concerns remain about the level of training, support and resources that would be required for the healthcare community to be capable of conducting BTA to an adequate quality standard without having to rely on external facilitators.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bowtie分析作为初级保健的前瞻性风险评估技术
尽管一再呼吁使用的严重重大事件的前瞻性评估在初级卫生保健,全科医生团队在英国很少应用的前瞻性风险评估的一种正式的方法,通常用于高危险行业。苏格兰NHS教育(NES)进行了一次探索性研讨会,以评估鲍蒂分析(BTA)作为一种主动识别和评估所依赖的控制手段的潜在价值,以防止潜在的初级保健“从未发生过的事件”的风险。结论是,BTA可以提供一种直接的方法,让一线医护人员和管理人员积极评估风险。然而,对于医疗保健社区能够在不依赖外部辅助人员的情况下以适当的质量标准开展BTA所需的培训、支持和资源水平,人们仍然感到担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Policy and Practice in Health and Safety
Policy and Practice in Health and Safety PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Safety risk factors in two different types of routine outsourced work: a systematic literature review Multimodal virtual environments: an opportunity to improve fire safety training? Road traffic collisions leading to human casualties in Riyadh: a retrospective study Addressing essential skills gaps among participants in an OHS training program: a pilot study Farewell from the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1