Lists, Vignettes, Enumerations: Contemporary Life Writing and the Gesture of Refusal toward Narrative

IF 0.8 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE POETICS TODAY Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1215/03335372-9642665
A. Rüggemeier
{"title":"Lists, Vignettes, Enumerations: Contemporary Life Writing and the Gesture of Refusal toward Narrative","authors":"A. Rüggemeier","doi":"10.1215/03335372-9642665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Focusing on Maggie Nelson's Bluets (2009) and Han Kang's The White Book (2016), this contribution explores how contemporary life writers critically engage with the causally and temporally bound form of narrative through the use of story-critical forms such as lists, vignettes, and meditations. While scholars of narrative agree that we witness a new dominance of the generic conventions of traditional autobiography—especially its trope of redemption and conversion narratives—among storytellers on digital platforms as well as in advertisement, marketing and political campaigns, the literary genre of autobiography, this article argues, starts to reinvent itself. The life writers Nelson and Kang turn toward the essayistic rather than the affirmative, the enumerative rather than the narrative, and the unity of form rather than the linear and causal cohesion of storytelling. Bluets and The White Book show their authors as deeply involved in imagining alternative acts of literary representation that exceed the scripts and protocols that are usually activated and called up through the story-ing of the self. As Nelson and Kang explore the story-critical affordances of fragmentary literary forms and test the limits of experientiality (sensu Fludernik), they highlight the opaqueness of life and ask for non-subsumptive readings (sensu Meretoja).","PeriodicalId":46669,"journal":{"name":"POETICS TODAY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POETICS TODAY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-9642665","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Focusing on Maggie Nelson's Bluets (2009) and Han Kang's The White Book (2016), this contribution explores how contemporary life writers critically engage with the causally and temporally bound form of narrative through the use of story-critical forms such as lists, vignettes, and meditations. While scholars of narrative agree that we witness a new dominance of the generic conventions of traditional autobiography—especially its trope of redemption and conversion narratives—among storytellers on digital platforms as well as in advertisement, marketing and political campaigns, the literary genre of autobiography, this article argues, starts to reinvent itself. The life writers Nelson and Kang turn toward the essayistic rather than the affirmative, the enumerative rather than the narrative, and the unity of form rather than the linear and causal cohesion of storytelling. Bluets and The White Book show their authors as deeply involved in imagining alternative acts of literary representation that exceed the scripts and protocols that are usually activated and called up through the story-ing of the self. As Nelson and Kang explore the story-critical affordances of fragmentary literary forms and test the limits of experientiality (sensu Fludernik), they highlight the opaqueness of life and ask for non-subsumptive readings (sensu Meretoja).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
列表、警戒线、列举:当代生活写作与拒绝叙事的姿态
这篇文章聚焦于玛吉·纳尔逊的《蓝》(2009)和韩抗的《白书》(2016),探讨了当代生活作家如何通过使用列表、小插曲和冥想等故事批评形式,批判性地参与因果和时间约束的叙事形式。尽管叙事学者们一致认为,我们见证了传统自传的通用惯例——尤其是其救赎和转换叙事的比喻——在数字平台以及广告、营销和政治活动中的故事讲述者中占据了新的主导地位,但本文认为,自传的文学流派开始重塑自己。生活作家Nelson和Kang转向散文主义而非肯定主义,枚举主义而非叙事,形式的统一而非故事的线性和因果衔接。Bluets和The White Book表明,他们的作者深度参与了对文学表现的替代行为的想象,这些行为超出了通常通过自我故事激活和调用的脚本和协议。当Nelson和Kang探索零碎文学形式的故事批判可供性,并测试经验的局限性(sense Fludernik)时,他们强调了生活的不透明性,并要求非包容性的阅读(sense Meretoja)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
POETICS TODAY
POETICS TODAY LITERATURE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: International Journal for Theory and Analysis of Literature and Communication Poetics Today brings together scholars from throughout the world who are concerned with developing systematic approaches to the study of literature (e.g., semiotics and narratology) and with applying such approaches to the interpretation of literary works. Poetics Today presents a remarkable diversity of methodologies and examines a wide range of literary and critical topics. Several thematic review sections or special issues are published in each volume, and each issue contains a book review section, with article-length review essays.
期刊最新文献
Visual Hybrids and Nonconceptual Aesthetic Perception Visual Metaphors: On the Linguistic Structure of Hybrid Creatures in Art L'idée de la littérature. De l'art pour l'art aux écritures d'intervention Hybridity and the Unifying Space of Painting: Larry Abramson in Conversation with Theolonius Marx Magical Monsters: Hybrids and Witchcraft in Early Modern Art
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1