Adaptation of autism spectrum screening questionnaire (ASSQ) for use in Georgian school settings

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Mental Health Pub Date : 2022-10-21 DOI:10.1108/jpmh-03-2022-0028
M. Zirakashvili, M. Gabunia, N. Mebonia, T. Mikiashvili, G. Lomidze, S. Bishop, B. Leventhal, Y. Kim
{"title":"Adaptation of autism spectrum screening questionnaire (ASSQ) for use in Georgian school settings","authors":"M. Zirakashvili, M. Gabunia, N. Mebonia, T. Mikiashvili, G. Lomidze, S. Bishop, B. Leventhal, Y. Kim","doi":"10.1108/jpmh-03-2022-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nEven though 95% of children with neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD), live in low- and middle-income countries, there is a dearth of studies from these countries, including the Republic of Georgia. Several ASD screening tools are available, but few are validated for use in Georgian or other smaller countries. This study aims to adapt and validate the autism spectrum screening questionnaire (ASSQ) for use in Georgia.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe ASSQ was administered for all third-grade students in 402 schools in the five main Georgian cities, n = 27,336. Prior to use, the 27-item ASSQ was translated, back-translated and adapted for use in Georgia. A total of 16,556 students (approximately 61%) were assessed by a parent and/or teacher. Optimal cutoff scores were estimated. Randomly chosen children who screened positive (n = 173) and negative (n = 127) were offered comprehensive assessment using standardized diagnostic procedures.\n\n\nFindings\nData from 15,510 parents- and 13,517 teachers-administered ASSQ revealed statistically significant differences in median and cutoff scores between parents and teachers: 7 versus 4 and 9 versus 6, respectively. Cutoff score = 14, on either parent or teacher ASSQ, had sensitivity of 0.94, indicating that it can be used in school settings.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe Georgian adaptation of the ASSQ creates opportunity for further ASD research, while also providing a valid screening tool for clinicians. Data from Georgia will add to the growing understanding of the broader ASD phenotype.\n","PeriodicalId":45601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Mental Health","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmh-03-2022-0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose Even though 95% of children with neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD), live in low- and middle-income countries, there is a dearth of studies from these countries, including the Republic of Georgia. Several ASD screening tools are available, but few are validated for use in Georgian or other smaller countries. This study aims to adapt and validate the autism spectrum screening questionnaire (ASSQ) for use in Georgia. Design/methodology/approach The ASSQ was administered for all third-grade students in 402 schools in the five main Georgian cities, n = 27,336. Prior to use, the 27-item ASSQ was translated, back-translated and adapted for use in Georgia. A total of 16,556 students (approximately 61%) were assessed by a parent and/or teacher. Optimal cutoff scores were estimated. Randomly chosen children who screened positive (n = 173) and negative (n = 127) were offered comprehensive assessment using standardized diagnostic procedures. Findings Data from 15,510 parents- and 13,517 teachers-administered ASSQ revealed statistically significant differences in median and cutoff scores between parents and teachers: 7 versus 4 and 9 versus 6, respectively. Cutoff score = 14, on either parent or teacher ASSQ, had sensitivity of 0.94, indicating that it can be used in school settings. Originality/value The Georgian adaptation of the ASSQ creates opportunity for further ASD research, while also providing a valid screening tool for clinicians. Data from Georgia will add to the growing understanding of the broader ASD phenotype.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自闭症谱系筛查问卷(ASSQ)在格鲁吉亚学校环境中的应用
尽管95%患有神经发育障碍(包括自闭症谱系障碍)的儿童生活在低收入和中等收入国家,但这些国家(包括格鲁吉亚共和国)缺乏相关研究。有几种ASD筛查工具可用,但很少有在格鲁吉亚或其他较小的国家得到验证。本研究的目的是适应和验证自闭症谱系筛查问卷(ASSQ)在格鲁吉亚的使用。设计/方法/方法对格鲁吉亚五个主要城市402所学校的所有三年级学生进行了ASSQ, n = 27,336。在使用之前,27项ASSQ被翻译,反翻译和改编以供格鲁吉亚使用。共有16,556名学生(约61%)接受了家长和/或老师的评估。估计最佳分数线。随机选择筛查阳性(n = 173)和阴性(n = 127)的儿童,采用标准化诊断程序进行综合评估。来自15,510名家长和13,517名教师的ASSQ数据显示,父母和教师之间的中位数和分数线在统计上存在显著差异:分别为7比4和9比6。截断分数= 14,无论是家长还是教师的ASSQ,敏感性为0.94,表明它可以在学校设置中使用。格鲁吉亚对asq的改编为进一步的ASD研究创造了机会,同时也为临床医生提供了有效的筛查工具。来自格鲁吉亚的数据将增加对更广泛的ASD表型的日益增长的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Mental Health
Journal of Public Mental Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Overcoming challenges of embedding child and youth mental health research in community NHS services Psychological wellbeing and avoidance strategies as moderators between excessive social media use and academic performance among Indian college students Pain and associated functional impairment in the Danish general population: the role of mental well-being Impact of nature on the mental health and well-being of the ICU survivors: an interpretative phenomenological analysis Public mental health and wellbeing interventions delivered by allied health professionals (AHPs): mapping the evidence and identification of gaps. A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1