Individual insurance products: is there a real choice for Russians?

Q2 Social Sciences Naselenie i ekonomika Pub Date : 2023-03-27 DOI:10.3897/popecon.7.e86059
S. Shchelokova, V. Vertogradov
{"title":"Individual insurance products: is there a real choice for Russians?","authors":"S. Shchelokova, V. Vertogradov","doi":"10.3897/popecon.7.e86059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the level of competition of insurance product offerings in the following four markets using the Russian market as an example: (1) life insurance, (2) accident and disease insurance, (3) voluntary health insurance and (4) pension insurance. The purpose of the study is to assess competitive dynamics in the insurance product markets during the period under review. Relevant data of the Expert Rating Agency for 2018-2021 were used as the study basis. The study methodology is based on the assessment of the competitive situation using the SV matrix, which is based on HTSV (level of differentiation within the dominant group) and CRSV (cumulative market share of the dominant group). The study shows that the Russian insurance market in 2018-2021 was quite diverse in terms of dominance. Most individual insurance products belong to the B4 quadrant of the SV matrix (a natural oligopoly), yet, the situation with the dominant group regarding types of insurance under study is significantly different, since the number of dominant players varies from 2 to 10, considerably affecting a real consumer choice, however, among the markets under study, there is none with low concentration or without a dominant group or dominant leader. In the VHI market, the choice is quite large, while the presence of a big dominant group of eight companies suggests formation of the two-tier companies. The top echelon sets quality standards and dominates by price, while other companies can compete with the leaders due to niche offerings and price factors. The pension insurance market is an example of a significantly reduced consumer choice: in 2018, it is in the RO quadrant with a relatively “weak” dominant group, while by 2021, a hardly differentiated oligopoly of 5 companies has been formed, controlling 95% of the market. Emerging players with the market and institutional opportunities similar to SOGAZ make significant changes in the market structure, as in the case of personal insurance market, wherein SOGAZ has absorbed the largest player, transferring the market from an oligopoly of seven companies to the actual dominance of the one.","PeriodicalId":33779,"journal":{"name":"Naselenie i ekonomika","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naselenie i ekonomika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.7.e86059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article analyzes the level of competition of insurance product offerings in the following four markets using the Russian market as an example: (1) life insurance, (2) accident and disease insurance, (3) voluntary health insurance and (4) pension insurance. The purpose of the study is to assess competitive dynamics in the insurance product markets during the period under review. Relevant data of the Expert Rating Agency for 2018-2021 were used as the study basis. The study methodology is based on the assessment of the competitive situation using the SV matrix, which is based on HTSV (level of differentiation within the dominant group) and CRSV (cumulative market share of the dominant group). The study shows that the Russian insurance market in 2018-2021 was quite diverse in terms of dominance. Most individual insurance products belong to the B4 quadrant of the SV matrix (a natural oligopoly), yet, the situation with the dominant group regarding types of insurance under study is significantly different, since the number of dominant players varies from 2 to 10, considerably affecting a real consumer choice, however, among the markets under study, there is none with low concentration or without a dominant group or dominant leader. In the VHI market, the choice is quite large, while the presence of a big dominant group of eight companies suggests formation of the two-tier companies. The top echelon sets quality standards and dominates by price, while other companies can compete with the leaders due to niche offerings and price factors. The pension insurance market is an example of a significantly reduced consumer choice: in 2018, it is in the RO quadrant with a relatively “weak” dominant group, while by 2021, a hardly differentiated oligopoly of 5 companies has been formed, controlling 95% of the market. Emerging players with the market and institutional opportunities similar to SOGAZ make significant changes in the market structure, as in the case of personal insurance market, wherein SOGAZ has absorbed the largest player, transferring the market from an oligopoly of seven companies to the actual dominance of the one.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个人保险产品:俄罗斯人真的有选择吗?
本文以俄罗斯市场为例,分析了以下四个市场保险产品的竞争水平:(1)人寿保险、(2)意外和疾病保险、(3)自愿健康保险和(4)养老保险。本研究的目的是评估审查期间保险产品市场的竞争动态。以专家评级机构2018-2021年的相关数据为研究依据。研究方法基于SV矩阵对竞争形势的评估,该矩阵基于HTSV(主导群体内的差异化水平)和CRSV(主导人群的累计市场份额)。研究表明,2018-2021年俄罗斯保险市场的主导地位相当多样化。大多数个人保险产品属于SV矩阵的B4象限(自然寡头垄断),然而,在所研究的保险类型方面,主导群体的情况有很大不同,因为主导参与者的数量从2到10不等,这在很大程度上影响了真正的消费者选择,没有一个集中度低,或者没有一个占主导地位的群体或主导地位的领导者。在VHI市场,选择余地相当大,而由八家公司组成的大型主导集团的存在表明形成了两层公司。顶级公司制定质量标准并以价格为主导,而其他公司由于利基产品和价格因素可以与领导者竞争。养老保险市场是消费者选择显著减少的一个例子:2018年,它处于RO象限,拥有相对“弱势”的主导群体,而到2021年,已经形成了一个由5家公司组成的几乎没有差异的寡头垄断,控制了95%的市场。拥有类似SOGAZ的市场和机构机会的新兴参与者对市场结构进行了重大改变,如个人保险市场,SOGAZ吸收了最大的参与者,将市场从七家公司的寡头垄断转移到一家公司的实际主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Naselenie i ekonomika
Naselenie i ekonomika Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Geoinformation analysis russian health system: modeling, visualization, analysis Sustainable development, ESG and the “price” of health Household time allocation in Russia: economic or sociocultural model? Cultural Changes in Russia during the Coronavirus Crisis Involved fatherhood in Russia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1