Statistical learning and big data applications

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-02 DOI:10.1515/labmed-2023-0037
H. Witte, T. Blatter, Priyanka Nagabhushana, David Schär, James Ackermann, J. Cadamuro, A. Leichtle
{"title":"Statistical learning and big data applications","authors":"H. Witte, T. Blatter, Priyanka Nagabhushana, David Schär, James Ackermann, J. Cadamuro, A. Leichtle","doi":"10.1515/labmed-2023-0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The amount of data generated in the field of laboratory medicine has grown to an extent that conventional laboratory information systems (LISs) are struggling to manage and analyze this complex, entangled information (“Big Data”). Statistical learning, a generalized framework from machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) is predestined for processing “Big Data” and holds the potential to revolutionize the field of laboratory medicine. Personalized medicine may in particular benefit from AI-based systems, especially when coupled with readily available wearables and smartphones which can collect health data from individual patients and offer new, cost-effective access routes to healthcare for patients worldwide. The amount of personal data collected, however, also raises concerns about patient-privacy and calls for clear ethical guidelines for “Big Data” research, including rigorous quality checks of data and algorithms to eliminate underlying bias and enable transparency. Likewise, novel federated privacy-preserving data processing approaches may reduce the need for centralized data storage. Generative AI-systems including large language models such as ChatGPT currently enter the stage to reshape clinical research, clinical decision-support systems, and healthcare delivery. In our opinion, AI-based systems have a tremendous potential to transform laboratory medicine, however, their opportunities should be weighed against the risks carefully. Despite all enthusiasm, we advocate for stringent added-value assessments, just as for any new drug or treatment. Human experts should carefully validate AI-based systems, including patient-privacy protection, to ensure quality, transparency, and public acceptance. In this opinion paper, data prerequisites, recent developments, chances, and limitations of statistical learning approaches are highlighted.","PeriodicalId":55986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2023-0037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The amount of data generated in the field of laboratory medicine has grown to an extent that conventional laboratory information systems (LISs) are struggling to manage and analyze this complex, entangled information (“Big Data”). Statistical learning, a generalized framework from machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) is predestined for processing “Big Data” and holds the potential to revolutionize the field of laboratory medicine. Personalized medicine may in particular benefit from AI-based systems, especially when coupled with readily available wearables and smartphones which can collect health data from individual patients and offer new, cost-effective access routes to healthcare for patients worldwide. The amount of personal data collected, however, also raises concerns about patient-privacy and calls for clear ethical guidelines for “Big Data” research, including rigorous quality checks of data and algorithms to eliminate underlying bias and enable transparency. Likewise, novel federated privacy-preserving data processing approaches may reduce the need for centralized data storage. Generative AI-systems including large language models such as ChatGPT currently enter the stage to reshape clinical research, clinical decision-support systems, and healthcare delivery. In our opinion, AI-based systems have a tremendous potential to transform laboratory medicine, however, their opportunities should be weighed against the risks carefully. Despite all enthusiasm, we advocate for stringent added-value assessments, just as for any new drug or treatment. Human experts should carefully validate AI-based systems, including patient-privacy protection, to ensure quality, transparency, and public acceptance. In this opinion paper, data prerequisites, recent developments, chances, and limitations of statistical learning approaches are highlighted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
统计学习和大数据应用
在检验医学领域产生的数据量已经增长到一定程度,传统的实验室信息系统(LISs)正在努力管理和分析这些复杂,纠缠的信息(“大数据”)。统计学习是机器学习(ML)和人工智能(AI)的一个广义框架,注定要处理“大数据”,并有可能彻底改变实验室医学领域。个性化医疗可能特别受益于基于人工智能的系统,特别是当与现成的可穿戴设备和智能手机相结合时,这些设备和智能手机可以收集个体患者的健康数据,并为全球患者提供新的、具有成本效益的医疗保健途径。然而,收集的大量个人数据也引发了对患者隐私的担忧,并呼吁为“大数据”研究制定明确的道德准则,包括对数据和算法进行严格的质量检查,以消除潜在的偏见,实现透明度。同样,新的联邦隐私保护数据处理方法可以减少对集中数据存储的需求。包括ChatGPT等大型语言模型在内的生成式人工智能系统目前正进入重塑临床研究、临床决策支持系统和医疗保健服务的阶段。在我们看来,基于人工智能的系统具有改变实验室医学的巨大潜力,然而,它们的机会应该与风险进行仔细权衡。尽管热情高涨,我们还是主张严格的附加价值评估,就像对待任何新药或治疗一样。人类专家应仔细验证基于人工智能的系统,包括患者隐私保护,以确保质量、透明度和公众接受度。在这篇意见论文中,数据的先决条件,最近的发展,机会,和统计学习方法的局限性突出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Laboratory Medicine Mathematics-Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Laboratory Medicine (JLM) is a bi-monthly published journal that reports on the latest developments in laboratory medicine. Particular focus is placed on the diagnostic aspects of the clinical laboratory, although technical, regulatory, and educational topics are equally covered. The Journal specializes in the publication of high-standard, competent and timely review articles on clinical, methodological and pathogenic aspects of modern laboratory diagnostics. These reviews are critically reviewed by expert reviewers and JLM’s Associate Editors who are specialists in the various subdisciplines of laboratory medicine. In addition, JLM publishes original research articles, case reports, point/counterpoint articles and letters to the editor, all of which are peer reviewed by at least two experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the stability of uncentrifuged serum and plasma analytes at various post-collection intervals How Gaussian mixture modelling can help to verify reference intervals from laboratory data with a high proportion of pathological values Using machine learning techniques for exploration and classification of laboratory data Automated sex and age partitioning for the estimation of reference intervals using a regression tree model Serum LDH and its isoenzymes (LDH2 and LDH5) associated with predictive value for refractory mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1