Taking turns: lesbian couples’ decision of (first) birth mother in Sweden

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Family Studies Pub Date : 2022-07-14 DOI:10.1080/13229400.2022.2098806
Madeleine Eriksson Kirsch, Marie Evertsson
{"title":"Taking turns: lesbian couples’ decision of (first) birth mother in Sweden","authors":"Madeleine Eriksson Kirsch, Marie Evertsson","doi":"10.1080/13229400.2022.2098806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article presents an analysis of how lesbian couples in Sweden negotiate birth motherhood in a context where equality is thought to be achieved by being and doing the same [Gullestad, M. (2002). Invisible fences: Egalitarianism, nationalism and racism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 8(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00098]. We do so by studying narratives of how 20 couples arrived at the decision of who will be the (first) birth mother, a decision unique to a small group of parents with theoretical implications for motherhood norms, kinship and within-couple decision-making extending beyond the couples themselves. Most couples interviewed planned to have two children and take turns carrying, a plan that to some extent solves the challenge of equality and sameness. Genetic links were downplayed and instead, the embodied and often desired experience of pregnancy was foregrounded. In deciding who would be the (first) birth mother, the couples’ reasoning centred on age and desire, both presented as harmless and ‘natural’ determinants that defused a potentially disruptive decision.","PeriodicalId":46462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Studies","volume":"29 1","pages":"1865 - 1883"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2022.2098806","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article presents an analysis of how lesbian couples in Sweden negotiate birth motherhood in a context where equality is thought to be achieved by being and doing the same [Gullestad, M. (2002). Invisible fences: Egalitarianism, nationalism and racism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 8(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00098]. We do so by studying narratives of how 20 couples arrived at the decision of who will be the (first) birth mother, a decision unique to a small group of parents with theoretical implications for motherhood norms, kinship and within-couple decision-making extending beyond the couples themselves. Most couples interviewed planned to have two children and take turns carrying, a plan that to some extent solves the challenge of equality and sameness. Genetic links were downplayed and instead, the embodied and often desired experience of pregnancy was foregrounded. In deciding who would be the (first) birth mother, the couples’ reasoning centred on age and desire, both presented as harmless and ‘natural’ determinants that defused a potentially disruptive decision.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轮流:瑞典女同性恋夫妇决定(第一)生母
这篇文章分析了瑞典的女同性恋伴侣如何在平等被认为是通过做同样的事情来实现的背景下协商生育母亲[Gullestad, M.(2002)]。看不见的栅栏:平等主义、民族主义和种族主义。皇家人类学研究所学报,8(1),45-63。https://doi.org/10.1111/1467 - 9655.00098)。我们通过研究20对夫妇如何决定谁将成为(第一个)生母的叙述来做到这一点,这是一小群父母所特有的决定,对母性规范、亲属关系和夫妻内部决策的理论影响超出了夫妇本身。大多数受访夫妇计划生两个孩子,轮流生育,这一计划在一定程度上解决了平等和同一性的挑战。基因联系被淡化了,相反,怀孕的具体化和经常渴望的经历被强调了。在决定谁将成为(第一个)生母时,夫妇们的推理集中在年龄和欲望上,这两个因素都被认为是无害的、“自然的”决定因素,化解了一个潜在的破坏性决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Family Studies
Journal of Family Studies FAMILY STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Family Studies is a peer reviewed international journal under the Editorship of Adjunct Professor Lawrie Moloney, School of Public Health, LaTrobe University; Australian Institute of Family Studies; and co-director of Children in Focus. The focus of the Journal of Family Studies is on the wellbeing of children in families in the process of change.
期刊最新文献
Cisgender men’s narratives about their desires to be pregnant: re/constructing reproduction, gender, and their entanglement Good normative parenting: towards a non-teleological and relational ideal African single mothers and their children in Canada: transnational experiences and sources of support Composition of Ukrainian households under forced migration and its impact on livelihood opportunities at early stage of stay in Krakow Introduction to a special issue in memoriam Michael Rush: the politics of fatherhood around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1