A hitchhikers' guide to the terminology of accreditation processes for health professionals and institutions.

MedEdPublish (2016) Pub Date : 2023-02-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.12688/mep.19566.1
Nuno Sousa, Andre Santa-Cruz, Antonio Melo, Camila Sousa, Fernanda Marques, Hugo Leite-Almeida, Lucimara Souza, Marco Marangoni, Marcia Raia, Maurilio Santos, Nuno Goncalves, Pedro Morgado, Pedro Souza, Rita Matos Sousa, Sara Gomes, Wilfredo Santos, Beatriz Araújo, Eliana Amaral, Vitor Pereira, Peter Scoles
{"title":"A hitchhikers' guide to the terminology of accreditation processes for health professionals and institutions.","authors":"Nuno Sousa, Andre Santa-Cruz, Antonio Melo, Camila Sousa, Fernanda Marques, Hugo Leite-Almeida, Lucimara Souza, Marco Marangoni, Marcia Raia, Maurilio Santos, Nuno Goncalves, Pedro Morgado, Pedro Souza, Rita Matos Sousa, Sara Gomes, Wilfredo Santos, Beatriz Araújo, Eliana Amaral, Vitor Pereira, Peter Scoles","doi":"10.12688/mep.19566.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accreditation processes for health care professions are designed to ensure that individuals and programs in these fields meet established standards of quality and effectiveness. The accelerating pace of globalization in the health care professions has increased the need for a shared understanding of the vocabulary of evaluation, assessment, and accreditation. The psychometric principles of valid and reliable assessment are commonly accepted, but the terminology is confusing. We believe that all stakeholders - evaluators, faculty, students but also the community - will benefit from a shared language and common set of definitions. We recognize that not all readers will agree with the definitions we propose, but we hope that this guide will help to ensure clarity, consistency, transparency, and fairness, and that it will promote through the stimulation of a debate greater collaboration across national and international boundaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":" ","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10652034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19566.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accreditation processes for health care professions are designed to ensure that individuals and programs in these fields meet established standards of quality and effectiveness. The accelerating pace of globalization in the health care professions has increased the need for a shared understanding of the vocabulary of evaluation, assessment, and accreditation. The psychometric principles of valid and reliable assessment are commonly accepted, but the terminology is confusing. We believe that all stakeholders - evaluators, faculty, students but also the community - will benefit from a shared language and common set of definitions. We recognize that not all readers will agree with the definitions we propose, but we hope that this guide will help to ensure clarity, consistency, transparency, and fairness, and that it will promote through the stimulation of a debate greater collaboration across national and international boundaries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生专业人员和机构认证过程术语指南
卫生保健专业的认证程序旨在确保这些领域的个人和项目符合既定的质量和有效性标准。医疗保健行业全球化步伐的加快增加了对评价、评估和认证词汇的共同理解的需要。心理测量学的有效和可靠的评估原则是普遍接受的,但术语是混乱的。我们相信所有的利益相关者——评估人员、教师、学生以及社区——都将受益于共享的语言和一套共同的定义。我们认识到,并非所有读者都会同意我们提出的定义,但我们希望本指南将有助于确保清晰、一致、透明和公平,并通过激发辩论来促进跨国家和国际边界的更大合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊最新文献
Medical students' knowledge on palliative care - a survey of teaching in Finland. Developing a clinician-friendly rubric for assessing history-taking skills in medical undergraduates speaking English as a foreign language. A retrospective feedback analysis of objective structured clinical examination performance of undergraduate medical students. Guidelines for Integrating actionable A-SMART Learning Outcomes into the Backward Design Process. Practical tips for teaching medicine in the metaverse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1