Remote sociophonetic data collection: Vowels and nasalization from self-recordings on personal devices

IF 2.8 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language and Linguistics Compass Pub Date : 2021-08-02 DOI:10.1111/lnc3.12435
Valerie Freeman, Paul De Decker
{"title":"Remote sociophonetic data collection: Vowels and nasalization from self-recordings on personal devices","authors":"Valerie Freeman,&nbsp;Paul De Decker","doi":"10.1111/lnc3.12435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>When the COVID-19 pandemic halted in-person data collection, many linguists adopted modern technologies to replace traditional methods, including speaker-led options in which participants record themselves using their own personal computers or smartphones and then email or upload the sound files to online storage sites for researchers to retrieve later. This study evaluated the suitability of such ‘home-made’ recordings for phonetic analysis of vowel space configurations, mergers, and nasalization by comparing simultaneous recordings from several popular personal devices (Macbook, PC laptop, iPad, iPhone and Android smartphone) to those taken from professional equipment (H4n field recorder, Focusrite with Audio Technica 2021 microphone). All personal devices conveyed vowel arrangements and nasalization patterns relatively faithfully (especially laptops), but absolute measurements varied, particularly for the female speaker and in the 750–1500 Hz range, which affected the locations (F1 × F2) of low and back vowels and reduced nasalization measurements (A1−P0) for the female's pre-nasal vowels. Based on these results, we assess the validity of remote recording using these consumer devices and offer recommendations for best practices for collecting high fidelity acoustic phonetic data from a distance.</p>","PeriodicalId":47472,"journal":{"name":"Language and Linguistics Compass","volume":"15 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/lnc3.12435","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Linguistics Compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lnc3.12435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

When the COVID-19 pandemic halted in-person data collection, many linguists adopted modern technologies to replace traditional methods, including speaker-led options in which participants record themselves using their own personal computers or smartphones and then email or upload the sound files to online storage sites for researchers to retrieve later. This study evaluated the suitability of such ‘home-made’ recordings for phonetic analysis of vowel space configurations, mergers, and nasalization by comparing simultaneous recordings from several popular personal devices (Macbook, PC laptop, iPad, iPhone and Android smartphone) to those taken from professional equipment (H4n field recorder, Focusrite with Audio Technica 2021 microphone). All personal devices conveyed vowel arrangements and nasalization patterns relatively faithfully (especially laptops), but absolute measurements varied, particularly for the female speaker and in the 750–1500 Hz range, which affected the locations (F1 × F2) of low and back vowels and reduced nasalization measurements (A1−P0) for the female's pre-nasal vowels. Based on these results, we assess the validity of remote recording using these consumer devices and offer recommendations for best practices for collecting high fidelity acoustic phonetic data from a distance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程社会语音学数据收集:个人设备上自录的元音和鼻音
当COVID-19大流行停止亲自收集数据时,许多语言学家采用现代技术来取代传统方法,包括以扬声器为主导的选项,参与者使用自己的个人电脑或智能手机录制自己的声音,然后通过电子邮件发送或上传声音文件到在线存储网站,供研究人员日后检索。本研究通过比较几种流行的个人设备(Macbook, PC笔记本电脑,iPad, iPhone和Android智能手机)和专业设备(H4n现场录音机,Focusrite with Audio Technica 2021麦克风)同时录制的录音,评估了这种“自制”录音对元音空间配置,合并和鼻音分析的适用性。所有个人设备(尤其是笔记本电脑)都相对忠实地传达了元音排列和鼻音模式,但绝对测量值各不相同,特别是对于女性说话者,在750-1500 Hz范围内,这影响了低元音和后元音的位置(F1 × F2),并降低了女性前鼻元音的鼻音测量值(A1−P0)。基于这些结果,我们评估了使用这些消费设备远程记录的有效性,并提供了从远处收集高保真声学语音数据的最佳实践建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Language and Linguistics Compass
Language and Linguistics Compass LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Unique in its range, Language and Linguistics Compass is an online-only journal publishing original, peer-reviewed surveys of current research from across the entire discipline. Language and Linguistics Compass publishes state-of-the-art reviews, supported by a comprehensive bibliography and accessible to an international readership. Language and Linguistics Compass is aimed at senior undergraduates, postgraduates and academics, and will provide a unique reference tool for researching essays, preparing lectures, writing a research proposal, or just keeping up with new developments in a specific area of interest.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Truthmaker Semantics and Natural Language Semantics The Semantics and Expression of Apprehensional Modality The Roles of Neural Networks in Language Acquisition Challenges and Strategies for Acquiring Adjectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1