Gibson and Time: The Temporal Framework of Direct Perception

IF 1.8 3区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Ecological Psychology Pub Date : 2023-02-02 DOI:10.1080/10407413.2023.2170234

S. E. Robbins

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The serious import of Gibson’s statement warning that physics “abstractions” of space and time “are not appropriate to psychology,” has not been understood. Underlying the space and time of physics is a largely unexamined metaphysic, what can be termed the “classic” (or spatial) metaphysic. This metaphysic is what Gibson implicitly rejected. His concept of direct perception, and necessarily then, direct memory, rely on, in fact, require, an alternative metaphysic of space and time for their understandability – what can be termed a “temporal metaphysic,” a framework which was explicitly developed by Bergson in Matter and Memory.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

吉布森与时间：直接感知的时间框架

吉布森警告物理学对空间和时间的“抽象”“不适合心理学”，这句话的严重意义尚未被理解。物理学的空间和时间是一个基本上未经检验的形而上学，可以被称为“经典”（或空间）形而上学。吉布森含蓄地拒绝了这种形而上学。事实上，他的直接感知概念，以及必然的直接记忆，依赖于一种可理解的空间和时间的替代形而上学——可以称之为“时间形而上学”，这是柏格森在《物质与记忆》中明确提出的框架。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Ecological Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

10.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： This unique journal publishes original articles that contribute to the understanding of psychological and behavioral processes as they occur within the ecological constraints of animal-environment systems. It focuses on problems of perception, action, cognition, communication, learning, development, and evolution in all species, to the extent that those problems derive from a consideration of whole animal-environment systems, rather than animals or their environments in isolation from each other. Significant contributions may come from such diverse fields as human experimental psychology, developmental/social psychology, animal behavior, human factors, fine arts, communication, computer science, philosophy, physical education and therapy, speech and hearing, and vision research.