Writing the Erasure of Emotions in Dystopian Young Adult Fiction: Reading Lois Lowry’s The Giver and Lauren Oliver’s Delirium

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Narrative Works-Issues Investigations & Interventions Pub Date : 2019-07-11 DOI:10.7202/1062099AR
Rocío G. Davis
{"title":"Writing the Erasure of Emotions in Dystopian Young Adult Fiction: Reading Lois Lowry’s The Giver and Lauren Oliver’s Delirium","authors":"Rocío G. Davis","doi":"10.7202/1062099AR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Young Adult (YA) dystopian fiction blends the traditional developmental narrative with a heightened concern with issues regarding the individual against society, often in the context of a post-apocalyptic world. In this article, I examine the way Lois Lowry’s The Giver (1993) and Lauren Oliver’s Delirium (2011) focus on the state’s regulation over or removal of their people’s emotions and decisions in the context of the representation of future societies. If we consider the place of emotions in YA literature in general, with its interest in adolescents’ interaction with their families, each other, their school, or other communities, we can accept the validity of emotions as a prism through which to examine the text’s didactic and social purposes. Specifically, by deploying a discourse that emphasizes the dangerous consequences of unbridled emotions in earlier historical times, dystopian texts ask us to think about the political potential of feelings as catalysts for social change.","PeriodicalId":41935,"journal":{"name":"Narrative Works-Issues Investigations & Interventions","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Narrative Works-Issues Investigations & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1062099AR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Young Adult (YA) dystopian fiction blends the traditional developmental narrative with a heightened concern with issues regarding the individual against society, often in the context of a post-apocalyptic world. In this article, I examine the way Lois Lowry’s The Giver (1993) and Lauren Oliver’s Delirium (2011) focus on the state’s regulation over or removal of their people’s emotions and decisions in the context of the representation of future societies. If we consider the place of emotions in YA literature in general, with its interest in adolescents’ interaction with their families, each other, their school, or other communities, we can accept the validity of emotions as a prism through which to examine the text’s didactic and social purposes. Specifically, by deploying a discourse that emphasizes the dangerous consequences of unbridled emotions in earlier historical times, dystopian texts ask us to think about the political potential of feelings as catalysts for social change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在反乌托邦青年小说中书写情感的抹去:读洛伊丝·劳瑞的《给予者》和劳伦·奥利弗的《谵妄》
青少年(YA)反乌托邦小说将传统的发展叙事与高度关注个人与社会的问题结合在一起,通常发生在后世界末日的背景下。在本文中,我考察了Lois Lowry的《给予者》(the Giver, 1993)和Lauren Oliver的《谵妄》(Delirium, 2011)在描述未来社会的背景下,关注国家对人民情绪和决定的监管或移除的方式。如果我们从总体上考虑情感在青少年文学中的地位,以及青少年与家人、彼此、学校或其他社区的互动,我们就可以接受情感作为棱镜的有效性,通过它来检查文本的教学和社会目的。具体来说,通过部署一种强调早期历史时期无节制情绪的危险后果的话语,反乌托邦文本要求我们思考情感作为社会变革催化剂的政治潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Seduction, Sharing Stories, and Borderlinking in Co-Constructed Narratives Ethnopoetics and Narrative Analysis On Reflexivity: Tribute to Catherine Kohler Riessman Looking Back, Looking Forward Play and Possibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1