From Trustworthy Data to Trustworthy IoT

IF 2 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems Pub Date : 2020-12-30 DOI:10.1145/3418686
C. Ardagna, Rasool Asal, E. Damiani, Nabil El Ioini, Mehdi Elahi, C. Pahl
{"title":"From Trustworthy Data to Trustworthy IoT","authors":"C. Ardagna, Rasool Asal, E. Damiani, Nabil El Ioini, Mehdi Elahi, C. Pahl","doi":"10.1145/3418686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Internet of Things (IoT) is composed of physical devices, communication networks, and services provided by edge systems and over-the-top applications. IoT connects billions of devices that collect data from the physical environment, which are pre-processed at the edge and then forwarded to processing services at the core of the infrastructure, on top of which cloud-based applications are built and provided to mobile end users. IoT comes with important advantages in terms of applications and added value for its users, making their world smarter and simpler. These advantages, however, are mitigated by the difficulty of guaranteeing IoT trustworthiness, which is still in its infancy. IoT trustworthiness is a must especially in critical domains (e.g., health, transportation) where humans become new components of an IoT system and their life is put at risk by system malfunctioning or breaches. In this article, we put forward the idea that trust in IoT can be boosted if and only if its automation and adaptation processes are based on trustworthy data. We therefore depart from a scenario that considers the quality of a single decision as the main goal of an IoT system and consider the trustworthiness of collected data as a fundamental requirement at the basis of a trustworthy IoT environment. We therefore define a methodology for data collection that filters untrusted data out according to trust rules evaluating the status of the devices collecting data and the collected data themselves. Our approach is based on blockchain and smart contracts and collects data whose trustworthiness and integrity are proven over time. The methodology balances trustworthiness and privacy and is experimentally evaluated in real-world and simulated scenarios using Hyperledger fabric blockchain.","PeriodicalId":7055,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems","volume":"5 1","pages":"1 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1145/3418686","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3418686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) is composed of physical devices, communication networks, and services provided by edge systems and over-the-top applications. IoT connects billions of devices that collect data from the physical environment, which are pre-processed at the edge and then forwarded to processing services at the core of the infrastructure, on top of which cloud-based applications are built and provided to mobile end users. IoT comes with important advantages in terms of applications and added value for its users, making their world smarter and simpler. These advantages, however, are mitigated by the difficulty of guaranteeing IoT trustworthiness, which is still in its infancy. IoT trustworthiness is a must especially in critical domains (e.g., health, transportation) where humans become new components of an IoT system and their life is put at risk by system malfunctioning or breaches. In this article, we put forward the idea that trust in IoT can be boosted if and only if its automation and adaptation processes are based on trustworthy data. We therefore depart from a scenario that considers the quality of a single decision as the main goal of an IoT system and consider the trustworthiness of collected data as a fundamental requirement at the basis of a trustworthy IoT environment. We therefore define a methodology for data collection that filters untrusted data out according to trust rules evaluating the status of the devices collecting data and the collected data themselves. Our approach is based on blockchain and smart contracts and collects data whose trustworthiness and integrity are proven over time. The methodology balances trustworthiness and privacy and is experimentally evaluated in real-world and simulated scenarios using Hyperledger fabric blockchain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从值得信赖的数据到值得信赖的物联网
物联网(Internet of Things, IoT)是由物理设备、通信网络以及边缘系统和顶级应用提供的服务组成的。物联网连接了数十亿个设备,这些设备从物理环境中收集数据,这些数据在边缘进行预处理,然后转发到基础设施核心的处理服务,在此基础上构建基于云的应用程序并提供给移动终端用户。物联网在应用和用户附加值方面具有重要优势,使他们的世界更智能、更简单。然而,这些优势因保证物联网可信度的困难而减弱,物联网仍处于起步阶段。物联网的可信度是必须的,特别是在关键领域(例如,健康,运输),在这些领域,人类成为物联网系统的新组成部分,他们的生命因系统故障或漏洞而面临风险。在本文中,我们提出了这样一种观点,即当且仅当物联网的自动化和适应过程基于可信数据时,才能提高对物联网的信任。因此,我们脱离了将单个决策的质量视为物联网系统主要目标的场景,并将收集数据的可信度视为可信赖物联网环境基础上的基本要求。因此,我们定义了一种数据收集方法,根据评估收集数据的设备和收集的数据本身的状态的信任规则过滤掉不受信任的数据。我们的方法是基于区块链和智能合约,并收集数据,这些数据的可信度和完整性随着时间的推移而得到证明。该方法平衡了可信度和隐私性,并使用Hyperledger fabric区块链在真实世界和模拟场景中进行了实验评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems
ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
On Cyber-Physical Fault Resilience in Data Communication: A Case From A LoRaWAN Network Systems Design DistressNet-NG: A Resilient Data Storage and Sharing Framework for Mobile Edge Computing in Cyber-Physical Systems A Blockchain Architecture to Increase the Resilience of Industrial Control Systems from the Effects of a Ransomware Attack: A Proposal and Initial Results A Combinatorial Optimization Analysis Method for Detecting Malicious Industrial Internet Attack Behaviors Statistical Verification using Surrogate Models and Conformal Inference and a Comparison with Risk-aware Verification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1