‘The Way of the Rain’: Towards a conceptual framework for the retrospective examination of historical American and Australian ‘rain follows the plow/plough’ messages

S. Swanberg
{"title":"‘The Way of the Rain’: Towards a conceptual framework for the retrospective examination of historical American and Australian ‘rain follows the plow/plough’ messages","authors":"S. Swanberg","doi":"10.22459/ireh.05.02.2019.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"History establishes that even before the advent of modern media, erroneous climate messages were disseminated to the public. A folk belief captured by the phrase ‘rain follows the plow’ (RFTP) is a prime example of such misinformation. This belief, popular in the late nineteenth century, maintained that cultivation of arid lands in the United States beyond the 100th meridian west would boost precipitation, creating a climate more favourable for farming. Encouraged by this narrative, homesteaders cultivated arid lands west of the meridian. Rain did not follow the plough and many farms in the Great Plains failed. RFTP was also invoked in South Australia in support of agricultural settlement north of Goyder’s Line, a geographical boundary delineating the limits of reliable rainfall in the colony. This article revisits the origins of the doctrine and places RFTP messaging in its historical context by examining articles and poetry published in American and Australian settlement-era newspapers. The results of two newspaper database surveys reveal that a number of historical RFTP stories and an environmental poem with religious overtones appeared first in US newspapers and were later republished in newspapers throughout Australia. One of the surveys also reveals that, from 1876 to 1898, reports of parliamentary discussions or debates referencing the slogan were published in South Australia. The dissemination of inaccurate climate information in settlement-era America and Australia is discussed in relation to a proposed conceptual framework based upon contemporary theories of science communication that might provide a basis for the analysis of historical science","PeriodicalId":34502,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Environmental History","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Environmental History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/ireh.05.02.2019.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

History establishes that even before the advent of modern media, erroneous climate messages were disseminated to the public. A folk belief captured by the phrase ‘rain follows the plow’ (RFTP) is a prime example of such misinformation. This belief, popular in the late nineteenth century, maintained that cultivation of arid lands in the United States beyond the 100th meridian west would boost precipitation, creating a climate more favourable for farming. Encouraged by this narrative, homesteaders cultivated arid lands west of the meridian. Rain did not follow the plough and many farms in the Great Plains failed. RFTP was also invoked in South Australia in support of agricultural settlement north of Goyder’s Line, a geographical boundary delineating the limits of reliable rainfall in the colony. This article revisits the origins of the doctrine and places RFTP messaging in its historical context by examining articles and poetry published in American and Australian settlement-era newspapers. The results of two newspaper database surveys reveal that a number of historical RFTP stories and an environmental poem with religious overtones appeared first in US newspapers and were later republished in newspapers throughout Australia. One of the surveys also reveals that, from 1876 to 1898, reports of parliamentary discussions or debates referencing the slogan were published in South Australia. The dissemination of inaccurate climate information in settlement-era America and Australia is discussed in relation to a proposed conceptual framework based upon contemporary theories of science communication that might provide a basis for the analysis of historical science
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“雨的方式”:建立一个概念框架,对美国和澳大利亚历史上的“雨跟犁走”信息进行回顾性研究
历史证明,即使在现代媒体出现之前,错误的气候信息就已经向公众传播。“雨随犁下”(RFTP)这句话所捕捉到的民间信仰就是这种错误信息的一个典型例子。这种在19世纪末流行的观点认为,在美国西部100子午线以外的干旱地区耕种将增加降水,创造更利于农业的气候。在这种叙述的鼓励下,自耕农耕种了子午线以西的干旱土地。雨没下,大平原上的许多农场都倒闭了。南澳大利亚州也援引RFTP来支持Goyder’s Line以北的农业定居点,Goyder‘s Line是一个地理边界,划定了殖民地可靠降雨的范围。本文通过研究美国和澳大利亚定居时代报纸上发表的文章和诗歌,重新审视了该学说的起源,并将RFTP信息置于其历史背景下。两项报纸数据库调查的结果显示,一些历史性的RFTP故事和一首带有宗教色彩的环境诗首先出现在美国报纸上,后来在澳大利亚各地的报纸上重新发布。其中一项调查还显示,从1876年到1898年,南澳大利亚州发布了引用该口号的议会讨论或辩论报告。根据当代科学传播理论提出的概念框架,讨论了定居时代美国和澳大利亚传播不准确的气候信息的问题,该框架可能为历史科学的分析提供基础
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Review of Environmental History
International Review of Environmental History Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Australia’s Pacific Maralinga: Nauru’s War of Rehabilitation in nuclear perspective Oil from penguins: Mentalities of extraction in the Southern Ocean World, 1889–1919 Toxic coloniality and the legacies of resource extraction in Africa Histories and legacies of extraction and toxicity: An introduction ‘Stealing fire from heaven’: Odette du Puigaudeau and French nuclear colonialism in the Algerian Sahara
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1