Coherent school improvement: Integrating outcomes-based assessment and trauma-informed practice

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Improving Schools Pub Date : 2020-09-09 DOI:10.1177/1365480220953640
C. A. Reierson, Stephen R. Becker
{"title":"Coherent school improvement: Integrating outcomes-based assessment and trauma-informed practice","authors":"C. A. Reierson, Stephen R. Becker","doi":"10.1177/1365480220953640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This literature review tests a framework for coherent implementation of school improvement initiatives. Often in education, initiatives are introduced as disparate, isolated approaches towards improved student learning. As a result, teachers, school-based administration and school districts frequently change their focus, contributing to fragmentation, stagnation and initiative fatigue. Robinson et al. offer ‘five domains of organizational activity’ as key areas of focus for coherent school improvement. We investigate application of Robinson et al.’s five domains to two seemingly disparate school improvement initiatives: outcomes-based assessment (OBA) and trauma-informed practice (TIP) as both represent significant areas of focus in our context. We construct our literature review around the central question: Can two divergent aspects of school improvement: outcomes-based assessment and trauma-informed practice, be aligned through Robinson et al.’s five domains, to coherently support their integration in schools? We found that Robinson et al.’s five domains were a useful tool for alignment of these diverse initiatives and were able to extrapolate beyond application to OBA and TIP, to other school improvement initiatives. Coherence benefits administration, teachers, and most importantly, promotes student achievement. When all elements of school improvement are part of a cohesive whole, all members the school community are better able to understand their role in driving student achievement.","PeriodicalId":45995,"journal":{"name":"Improving Schools","volume":"24 1","pages":"124 - 136"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1365480220953640","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Improving Schools","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480220953640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This literature review tests a framework for coherent implementation of school improvement initiatives. Often in education, initiatives are introduced as disparate, isolated approaches towards improved student learning. As a result, teachers, school-based administration and school districts frequently change their focus, contributing to fragmentation, stagnation and initiative fatigue. Robinson et al. offer ‘five domains of organizational activity’ as key areas of focus for coherent school improvement. We investigate application of Robinson et al.’s five domains to two seemingly disparate school improvement initiatives: outcomes-based assessment (OBA) and trauma-informed practice (TIP) as both represent significant areas of focus in our context. We construct our literature review around the central question: Can two divergent aspects of school improvement: outcomes-based assessment and trauma-informed practice, be aligned through Robinson et al.’s five domains, to coherently support their integration in schools? We found that Robinson et al.’s five domains were a useful tool for alignment of these diverse initiatives and were able to extrapolate beyond application to OBA and TIP, to other school improvement initiatives. Coherence benefits administration, teachers, and most importantly, promotes student achievement. When all elements of school improvement are part of a cohesive whole, all members the school community are better able to understand their role in driving student achievement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
连贯的学校改进:整合基于结果的评估和创伤知情的实践
本文献综述测试了连贯实施学校改进倡议的框架。在教育中,倡议往往是作为不同的、孤立的方法来提高学生的学习。因此,教师、校本管理和学区经常改变他们的重点,造成分裂、停滞和主动性疲劳。Robinson等人提出了“组织活动的五个领域”,作为连贯学校改进的重点领域。我们调查了Robinson等人的五个领域在两个看似不同的学校改进计划中的应用:基于结果的评估(OBA)和创伤知情实践(TIP),因为这两个领域在我们的背景下都代表了重要的关注领域。我们围绕中心问题构建了我们的文献综述:学校改进的两个不同方面:基于结果的评估和创伤知情的实践,能否通过罗宾逊等人的五个领域协调一致,以连贯地支持他们在学校的整合?我们发现Robinson等人的五个领域是一个有用的工具,可以将这些不同的倡议结合起来,并能够推断出OBA和TIP以外的应用,以及其他学校改进倡议。连贯性有利于管理,教师,最重要的是,促进学生的成绩。当学校改善的所有要素成为一个有凝聚力的整体的一部分时,学校社区的所有成员都能更好地理解他们在推动学生成就方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Improving Schools
Improving Schools EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Improving Schools is for all those engaged in school development, whether improving schools in difficulty or making successful schools even better. The journal includes contributions from across the world with an increasingly international readership including teachers, heads, academics, education authority staff, inspectors and consultants. Improving Schools has created a forum for the exchange of ideas and experiences. Major national policies and initiatives have been evaluated, to share good practice and to highlight problems. The journal also reports on visits to successful schools in diverse contexts, and includes book reviews on a wide range of developmental issues.
期刊最新文献
Integrating pro-environmental behaviors into school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports for creating green schools Teachers’ digital pedagogies and experiences in virtual classrooms Translating sophisticated data analytic strategies regarding school attendance and absenteeism into targeted educational policy Editorial Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1