Accounting for snowpack and time-varying lags in statistical models of stream temperature

IF 3.1 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Hydrology X Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hydroa.2022.100136
Jared E. Siegel , Aimee H. Fullerton , Chris E. Jordan
{"title":"Accounting for snowpack and time-varying lags in statistical models of stream temperature","authors":"Jared E. Siegel ,&nbsp;Aimee H. Fullerton ,&nbsp;Chris E. Jordan","doi":"10.1016/j.hydroa.2022.100136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Water temperature plays a primary role in driving ecological processes in streams due to its direct impact on biogeochemical cycles and the physiological processes of stream fauna, such as growth, development, and the timing of life history events. Streams influenced by snowpack melt are generally cooler in the summer and demonstrate less sensitivity to climate variability in what is commonly referred to as “climate buffering”. Despite the substantial influence of snowpack on stream temperature and expected changes in snowpack accumulation and melt timing with climate change, methods for representing snowpack in statistical models for stream temperature have not been well explored. In this investigation, we quantified the extent of stream temperature buffering in free-flowing streams across a geographically diverse region in the Pacific Northwest USA. We demonstrated that statistical models of daily mean stream temperature can be improved by explicitly accounting for temporal variability in a small number of climate covariates believed to be mechanistically related to stream temperature. Our novel statistical approach included as predictors combinations and interactions between the following variables: (1) air temperature, (2) lagged air temperature (where the lag duration varied according to its relationship with flow on a given day at that site), (3) flow, (4) snowpack in the upstream catchment, and (5) day of year. We found that sites with substantial snow influence were associated with increased air temperature buffering during the warm season and longer air temperature lags (&gt;30 days during spring high flows and ∼ 10 days during late summer low flows) compared to sites where precipitation predominantly fell as rain (&lt;6 days year-round). By accounting for snowpack and temporal variation in lagged heat transfer processes, our models were able to accurately predict seasonal patterns and interannual variability in stream temperature in validation data from years not used in model fits using publicly available data sources (average RMPSE ∼ 0.80).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology X","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100136"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589915522000189/pdfft?md5=6191c4f21df33066d0810794bef28f74&pid=1-s2.0-S2589915522000189-main.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589915522000189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Water temperature plays a primary role in driving ecological processes in streams due to its direct impact on biogeochemical cycles and the physiological processes of stream fauna, such as growth, development, and the timing of life history events. Streams influenced by snowpack melt are generally cooler in the summer and demonstrate less sensitivity to climate variability in what is commonly referred to as “climate buffering”. Despite the substantial influence of snowpack on stream temperature and expected changes in snowpack accumulation and melt timing with climate change, methods for representing snowpack in statistical models for stream temperature have not been well explored. In this investigation, we quantified the extent of stream temperature buffering in free-flowing streams across a geographically diverse region in the Pacific Northwest USA. We demonstrated that statistical models of daily mean stream temperature can be improved by explicitly accounting for temporal variability in a small number of climate covariates believed to be mechanistically related to stream temperature. Our novel statistical approach included as predictors combinations and interactions between the following variables: (1) air temperature, (2) lagged air temperature (where the lag duration varied according to its relationship with flow on a given day at that site), (3) flow, (4) snowpack in the upstream catchment, and (5) day of year. We found that sites with substantial snow influence were associated with increased air temperature buffering during the warm season and longer air temperature lags (>30 days during spring high flows and ∼ 10 days during late summer low flows) compared to sites where precipitation predominantly fell as rain (<6 days year-round). By accounting for snowpack and temporal variation in lagged heat transfer processes, our models were able to accurately predict seasonal patterns and interannual variability in stream temperature in validation data from years not used in model fits using publicly available data sources (average RMPSE ∼ 0.80).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑河流温度统计模型中的积雪和时变滞后
水温对河流生物地球化学循环和河流动物的生理过程(如生长、发育和生活史事件的时间)具有直接影响,因此在驱动河流生态过程中起着主要作用。受积雪融化影响的河流在夏季通常较冷,对通常称为“气候缓冲”的气候变化的敏感性较低。尽管积雪对河流温度有实质性的影响,以及积雪积累和融化时间随气候变化的预期变化,但在河流温度统计模型中表示积雪的方法尚未得到很好的探索。在这项调查中,我们量化了在美国西北太平洋地区地理多样性地区自由流动的溪流中溪流温度缓冲的程度。我们证明,通过明确考虑被认为与河流温度机械相关的少数气候协变量的时间变异性,可以改进日平均河流温度的统计模型。我们的新统计方法包括以下变量之间的组合和相互作用的预测因子:(1)气温,(2)滞后气温(滞后时间根据该地点某一天的流量关系而变化),(3)流量,(4)上游集水区的积雪,以及(5)一年中的哪一天。我们发现,与降水主要为雨的地点(全年6天)相比,有大量降雪影响的地点在暖季气温缓冲增加,气温滞后时间更长(春季高流量为30天,夏末低流量为10天)。通过考虑滞后传热过程中的积雪和时间变化,我们的模型能够在使用公开数据源的模型拟合中未使用的年份的验证数据中准确预测季节模式和河流温度的年际变化(平均RMPSE ~ 0.80)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology X
Journal of Hydrology X Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
20
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Revisiting model complexity: Space-time correction of high dimensional variable sets in climate model simulations Effects of model complexity on karst catchment runoff modeling for flood warning systems Quantifying the economic value of a national hydrometric network for households Private sensors and crowdsourced rainfall data: Accuracy and potential for modelling pluvial flooding in urban areas of Oslo, Norway A combined data assimilation and deep learning approach for continuous spatio-temporal SWE reconstruction from sparse ground tracks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1